Using multiple high-count electrode arrays in human median and ulnar nerves to restore sensorimotor function after previous transradial amputation of the hand

Peripheral nerve interfaces that can record from and stimulate large numbers of different nerve fibers selectively and independently may help restore intuitive and effective motor and sensory function after hand amputation. To this end, and extending previous work in two subjects, two 100-electrode Utah Slanted Electrode Arrays (USEAs) were implanted for four weeks in the residual ulnar and median nerves of a 50-year-old male whose left, dominant hand had been amputated 21 years previously. Subsequent experiments involved 1) recording from USEAs for real-time control of a virtual prosthetic hand; 2) stimulation to evoke somatosensory percepts; and 3) closed-loop sensorimotor control. Overall, partial motor control and sensation were achieved using USEAs. 1) Isolated action potentials recorded from nerve motor fibers, although sparse at these distal implant sites, were activated during fictive movements of the phantom hand. Unlike in our previous two subjects, electromyographic (EMG) activity contributed to most online recordings and decodes, but was reduced in offline analyses using common average referencing. Online and offline Kalman-filter decodes of thresholded neural or EMG spikes independently controlled different digits of the virtual hand with one or two degrees of freedom. 2) Microstimulation through individual electrodes of the two USEAs evoked up to 106 different percepts, covering much of the phantom hand. The subject discriminated among five perceived stimulus locations, and between two somatosensory submodalities at a single location. 3) USEA-evoked percepts, mimicking contact with either a near or distal virtual target, were used to terminate movements of the virtual hand controlled with USEA recordings comprised wholly or mostly of EMG. These results further indicate that USEAs can help restore sensory and motor function after hand loss.

[1]  Dominique M. Durand,et al.  Chronic measurement of the stimulation selectivity of the flat interface nerve electrode , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  Stuart D. Harshbarger,et al.  Revolutionizing Prosthetics : Systems Engineering Challenges and Opportunities , 2011 .

[3]  Robert D. Lipschutz,et al.  The use of targeted muscle reinnervation for improved myoelectric prosthesis control in a bilateral shoulder disarticulation amputee , 2004, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[4]  G.S. Dhillon,et al.  Direct neural sensory feedback and control of a prosthetic arm , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[5]  Reid R. Harrison,et al.  Recording sensory and motor information from peripheral nerves with Utah Slanted Electrode Arrays , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[6]  Luca Citi,et al.  Restoring Natural Sensory Feedback in Real-Time Bidirectional Hand Prostheses , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[7]  R. Stein,et al.  Selective stimulation of cat sciatic nerve using an array of varying-length microelectrodes. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  Michael J. Black,et al.  Neural control of cursor trajectory and click by a human with tetraplegia 1000 days after implant of an intracortical microelectrode array , 2011 .

[9]  K. Horch,et al.  Residual function in peripheral nerve stumps of amputees: implications for neural control of artificial limbs. , 2004, The Journal of hand surgery.

[10]  Kathryn Ziegler-Graham,et al.  Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.