Beyond Simple Configurations: The Dual Involvement of Divisional and Corporate Headquarters in Subsidiary Innovation Activities in Multibusiness Firms

[1]  T. Kostova,et al.  Understanding Agency Problems in Headquarters-Subsidiary Relationships in Multinational Corporations: A Contextualized Model , 2018 .

[2]  M. Baaij,et al.  Disaggregating the Corporate Headquarters: Investor Reactions to Inversion Announcements by US Firms , 2017 .

[3]  P. Kappen,et al.  Reconceptualising Hierarchies: The Disaggregation and Dispersion of Headquarters in Multinational Corporations , 2017 .

[4]  Brian C. Pinkham,et al.  MNE Headquarters Disaggregation: The Formation Antecedents of Regional Management Centers , 2017 .

[5]  Henrik Dellestrand,et al.  Beyond Simple Configurations: The Dual Involvement of Divisional and Corporate Headquarters in Subsidiary Innovation Activities in Multibusiness Firms , 2017, Management International Review.

[6]  Tina C. Ambos,et al.  Rethinking the role of the centre in the multidivisional firm: A retrospective , 2017 .

[7]  T. Noordewier,et al.  Overstating and Understating Interaction Results in International Business Research , 2016 .

[8]  Björn Ambos,et al.  How does Geographic Distance Impact the Relevance of HQ Knowledge?: The Mediating Role of Shared Context , 2016 .

[9]  Gérard Roland,et al.  Markets and Hierarchies , 2016 .

[10]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  How Do Firms Manage Strategic Dualities? A Process Perspective , 2016 .

[11]  A. McDonnell,et al.  Why are Some Subsidiaries of Multinationals the Source of Novel Practices While Others are Not? National, Corporate and Functional Influences , 2015 .

[12]  Tom J. M. Mom,et al.  Why Do Multinational Corporations Relocate Core Parts of Their Corporate Headquarters Abroad , 2015 .

[13]  U. Zander,et al.  International Strategy and Knowledge Creation: The Advantage of Foreignness and Liability of Concentration , 2014 .

[14]  Gloria Cuevas Rodríguez,et al.  Internal and External Social Capital for Radical Product Innovation: Do They Always Work Well Together? , 2014 .

[15]  Marc Baaij,et al.  The role of headquarters–subsidiary geographic distance in strategic decisions by spatially disaggregated headquarters , 2013 .

[16]  William G. Egelhoff,et al.  Designing Matrix Structures to Fit MNC Strategy , 2013 .

[17]  William G. Egelhoff,et al.  Designing Matrix Structures to Fit MNC Strategy: Designing Matrix Structures to Fit MNC Strategy , 2013 .

[18]  William G. Egelhoff,et al.  An empirical evaluation of conflict in MNC matrix structure firms , 2013 .

[19]  Björn Ambos,et al.  Parenting Advantage in the MNC: An Embeddedness Perspective on the Value Added by Headquarters , 2013 .

[20]  N. Foss,et al.  MNC Organizational Form and Subsidiary Motivation Problems: Controlling Intervention Hazards in the Network MNC , 2012 .

[21]  Eva A. Alfoldi,et al.  Coordination at the Edge of the Empire: The Delegation of Headquarters Functions through Regional Management Mandates , 2012 .

[22]  Jan Johanson,et al.  Overcoming the Liability of Outsidership—The Challenge of HQ of the Global Firm , 2012 .

[23]  Henrik Dellestrand,et al.  The effects of spatial and contextual factors on headquarters resource allocation to MNE subsidiaries , 2012 .

[24]  Henrik Dellestrand,et al.  Headquarters Allocation of Resources to Innovation Transfer Projects within the Multinational Enterprise , 2011 .

[25]  Francesco Ciabuschi,et al.  Internal Embeddedness, Headquarters Involvement, and Innovation Importance in Multinational Enterprises , 2011 .

[26]  M. Forsgren,et al.  Rationality vs ignorance: The role of MNE headquarters in subsidiaries’ innovation processes , 2011 .

[27]  Henrik Dellestrand.  Subsidiary embeddedness as a determinant of divisional headquarters involvement in innovation transfer processes , 2011 .

[28]  Általános társadalom tudományok,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 2011 .

[29]  Samuel S. Holloway,et al.  Actions Speak Louder than Modes: Antecedents and Implications of Parent Implementation Capabilities on Business Unit Performance , 2011 .

[30]  R. Narula,et al.  Multinational Enterprises and Local Contexts: The Opportunities and Challenges of Multiple Embeddedness , 2011 .

[31]  Sverre Tomassen,et al.  Distant Encounters of the Third Kind: Multinational Companies Locating Divisional Headquarters Abroad , 2011 .

[32]  B. Schlegelmilch,et al.  The MNC as an Externally Embedded Organization: An Investigation of Embeddedness Overlap in Local Subsidiary Networks , 2010 .

[33]  Tina C. Ambos,et al.  What are the consequences of initiative-taking in multinational subsidiaries? , 2010 .

[34]  Björn Ambos,et al.  How Do MNC Headquarters Add Value? , 2010 .

[35]  Tina C. Ambos,et al.  Headquarters’ Attention and Its Effect on Subsidiary Performance , 2010 .

[36]  P. Ghauri,et al.  Regional Management as a System , 2010 .

[37]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Rewiring: Cross-Business-Unit Collaborations in Multibusiness Organizations , 2010 .

[38]  J. Johanson,et al.  The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership , 2009 .

[39]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Designing Matrix Organizations that Actually Work: How IBM, Procter & Gamble and Others Design for Success , 2008 .

[40]  Mihir A. Desai.  The Decentering of the Global Firm , 2008 .

[41]  Thomas P. Kenworthy,et al.  Multidivisional vs metanational governance of the multinational enterprise , 2008 .

[42]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Weight Versus Voice: How Foreign Subsidiaries Gain Attention From Corporate Headquarters , 2008 .

[43]  A. Saka‐Helmhout.  Unravelling learning within multinational corporations , 2008 .

[44]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Weight versus Voice: How Foreign Subsidiaries Capture the Attention of Corporate Headquarters , 2007 .

[45]  Ulf R. Andersson,et al.  Balancing subsidiary influence in the federative MNC: a business network view , 2007 .

[46]  M. Nyaw,et al.  Do Multiple Parents Help or Hinder International Joint Venture Performance? The Mediating Roles of Contract Completeness and Partner Cooperation , 2007 .

[47]  J. I. Canales,et al.  Subsidiary Strategy: The Embeddedness Component , 2007 .

[48]  Corey C. Phelps,et al.  Interfirm Collaboration Networks: The Impact of Large-Scale Network Structure on Firm Innovation , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[49]  Antonio Capaldo.  Network Structure and Innovation: The Leveraging of a Dual Network as a Distinctive Relational Capability , 2006 .

[50]  Arvind Parkhe,et al.  Orchestrating Innovation Networks , 2006 .

[51]  H. Schoch,et al.  The Management of Information and Managers in Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations , 2006 .

[52]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  WHY DO SOME MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS RELOCATE THEIR HEADQUARTERS OVERSEAS , 2006 .

[53]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[54]  Joseph L. Bower,et al.  From resource allocation to strategy , 2005 .

[55]  Paul D. Bliese,et al.  Being Both Too Liberal and Too Conservative: The Perils of Treating Grouped Data as though They Were Independent , 2004 .

[56]  Christian Koch,et al.  Innovation networking between stability and political dynamics , 2004 .

[57]  C. Un,et al.  Strategies for Knowledge Creation in Firms , 2004 .

[58]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[59]  S. Scherer,et al.  Structure of the nucleon in chiral perturbation theory , 2003, hep-ph/0309234.

[60]  Jerker Denrell,et al.  Vicarious Learning, Undersampling of Failure, and the Myths of Management , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[61]  Laura Poppo,et al.  The Visible Hands of Hierarchy within the M‐Form: An Empirical Test of Corporate Parenting of Internal Product Exchanges* , 2003 .

[62]  Ulf R. Andersson,et al.  The strategic impact of external networks: Subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation , 2002 .

[63]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  CENTERS OF EXCELLENCE IN MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS , 2002 .

[64]  Andrew Campbell,et al.  Parenting in Complex Structures , 2002 .

[65]  D. Ford,et al.  How should companies interact in business networks , 2002 .

[66]  J. Barney,et al.  The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991 , 2001 .

[67]  M. Nyaw,et al.  A Dual Parent Perspective on Control and Performance in International Joint Ventures: Lessons From a Developing Economy , 2001 .

[68]  A. Rugman,et al.  Subsidiary‐specific advantages in multinational enterprises , 2001 .

[69]  M. Lindell,et al.  Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[70]  Thomas R. Eisenmann,et al.  The Entrepreneurial M-Form: Strategic Integration in Global Media Firms , 2000 .

[71]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Multinational Subsidiary Evolution: Capability and Charter Change in Foreign-Owned Subsidiary Companies , 1998 .

[72]  Andrew Campbell,et al.  Corporate strategy and parenting theory , 1998 .

[73]  W. Ocasio.  TOWARDS AN ATTENTION-BASED VIEW OF THE FIRM , 1997 .

[74]  Nicolai J. Foss,et al.  On the Rationales of Corporate Headquarters , 1997 .

[75]  J. K. Broida.  Competing for the Future: Breakthrough Strategies for Seizing Control of Your Industry and Creating the Markets of Tomorrow , 1994 .

[76]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation , 1993 .

[77]  J. Dutton,et al.  SELLING ISSUES TO TOP MANAGEMENT , 1993 .

[78]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  Cooperative Versus Competitive Structures in Related and Unrelated Diversified Firms , 1992 .

[79]  Alfred D. Chandler.  The functions of the HQ unit in the multibusiness firm , 1991 .

[80]  C. Bartlett,et al.  The Multinational Corporation as an Interorganizational Network , 1990 .

[81]  John Cantwell,et al.  Technological Innovation and Multinational Corporations , 1989 .

[82]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Resource Sharing Among Sbus: Strategic Antecedents and Administrative Implications , 1986 .

[83]  L. Vogel,et al.  Strategy and Structure , 1986 .

[84]  O. Williamson.  Organization Form, Residual Claimants, and Corporate Control , 1983, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[85]  D. Teece.  Technology Transfer by Multinational Firms: The Resource Cost of Transferring Technological Know-How , 1977 .

[86]  J. Gower,et al.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[87]  Tina C. Ambos,et al.  accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving. BOUNDARY SPANNING ACTIVITIES OF CORPORATE HQ EXECUTIVES INSIGHTS FROM A LONGITUDINAL STUDY , 2018 .

[88]  T. Kostova,et al.  Utilizing the broader agency perspective for studying headquarters–subsidiary relations in multinational companies , 2015 .

[89]  Torben Pedersen,et al.  Host-country environment and subsidiary competence: Extending the diamond network model , 2009 .

[90]  G. Reger.  Internationalisation of research and development in western European, Japanese and North American multinationals , 2002 .

[91]  K. Asakawa.  Evolving headquarters-subsidiary dynamics in international R&D: the case of Japanese multinationals , 2001 .

[92]  J. Dunning.  Multinational enterprises and the globalization of innovatory capacity , 1994 .

[93]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Competing for the Future , 1994 .

[94]  Vincent di Norcia.  Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution , 1991 .

[95]  William G. Egelhoff.  STRATEGY AND STRUCTURE IN MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS: A REVISION OF THE STOPFORD AND WELLS MODEL , 1988 .

[96]  G EgelhoffW,et al.  多国籍企業における戦略と構造 ストップフォード・ウェルズ・モデルの修正 , 1988 .

[97]  Louis T. Wells,et al.  Managing the multinational enterprise , 1972 .