Effects of auditory stimulus intensity on response force in simple, go/no-go, and choice RT tasks

In four experiments, increasing the intensities of both relevant and irrelevant auditory stimuli was found to increase response force (RF) in simple, go/no-go, and choice reaction time (RT) tasks. These results raise problems for models that localize the effects of auditory intensity on purely perceptual processes, indicating instead that intensity also affects motor output processes under many circumstances. In Experiment 1, simple RT, go/no-go, and choice RT tasks were compared, using the same stimuli for all tasks. Auditory stimulus intensity affected both RT and RF, and these effects were not modulated by task. In Experiments 2–4, an irrelevant auditory accessory stimulus accompanied a relevant visual stimulus, and the go/no-go and choice tasks were used. The intensity of the irrelevant auditory accessory stimulus was found to affect RT and RF, although the sizes of these effects depended somewhat on the temporal predictability of the accessory stimulus.

[1]  A. Sanders Towards a model of stress and human performance. , 1983, Acta psychologica.

[2]  H G Vaughan,et al.  The functional relation of visual evoked response and reaction time to stimulus intensity. , 1966, Vision research.

[3]  P J Keuss,et al.  Reaction time to the second of two shortly spaced auditory signals both varying in intensity. , 1972, Acta psychologica.

[4]  A. Sanders,et al.  A suppressing effect of response selection on immediate arousal in a choice reaction task. , 1978, Acta Psychologica.

[5]  P. J. Foley The foreperiod and simple reaction time. , 1959, Canadian journal of psychology.

[6]  P. Bertelson,et al.  The time-course of preparation: Confirmatory results with visual and auditory warning signals , 1969 .

[7]  J Miller,et al.  Absence of coactivation in the motor component: evidence from psychophysiological measures of target detection. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  J. Townsend,et al.  Spatio-temporal properties of elementary perception: an investigation of parallel, serial, and coactive theories , 1995 .

[9]  C. Brunia,et al.  Waiting in readiness: gating in attention and motor preparation. , 1993, Psychophysiology.

[10]  James L. McClelland,et al.  On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. , 1990, Psychological review.

[11]  D. Broadbent Perception and communication , 1958 .

[12]  C. Brunia,et al.  Effects of stimulus and task factors on achilles tendon reflexes evoked early during a preparatory period , 1982, Physiology & Behavior.

[13]  Rolf Ulrich,et al.  Time resolution of clocks: Effects on reaction time measurement—Good news for bad clocks , 1989 .

[14]  M. Nissen,et al.  Stimulus intensity and information processing , 1977 .

[15]  David A. Balota,et al.  Mental Chronometry: Beyond Reaction Time , 1991 .

[16]  C. Frith,et al.  Routes to action in reaction time tasks , 1986, Psychological research.

[17]  R A Abrams,et al.  Mental chronometry: beyond onset latencies in the lexical decision task. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  James D. Hildreth Bloch’s law and a Poisson counting model for simple reaction time to light , 1979 .

[19]  R. Ulrich,et al.  A double-response paradigm to study stimulus intensity effects upon the motor system in simple reaction time experiments , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  James T. Townsend,et al.  A trichotomy: Interactions of factors prolonging sequential and concurrent mental processes in stochastic discrete mental (PERT) networks , 1989 .

[21]  James L. McClelland On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. , 1979 .

[22]  Feliks Jaroszyk,et al.  The relationship between latency of auditory evoked potentials, simple reaction time, and stimulus intensity , 1994, Psychological research.

[23]  Donald E. Broadbent,et al.  Decision and stress , 1971 .

[24]  R. Ulrich,et al.  Does Immediate Arousal Enhance Response Force in Simple Reaction Time? , 1996, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[25]  F J Steyvers,et al.  The influence of sleep deprivation and knowledge of results on perceptual encoding. , 1987, Acta psychologica.

[26]  S. Sternberg The discovery of processing stages , 1969 .

[27]  M. W. van der Molen,et al.  Positive and negative effects of stimulus intensity in auditory reaction tasks: further studies on immediate arousal. , 1982, Acta psychologica.

[28]  Saul Sternberg,et al.  The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method , 1969 .

[29]  M Giray,et al.  Motor coactivation revealed by response force in divided and focused attention. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  A. Angel,et al.  Input-Output Relations in Simple Reaction Time Experiments , 1973, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[31]  I H Bernstein,et al.  Can we see and hear at the same time? Some recent studies of intersensory facilitation of reaction time. , 1970, Acta psychologica.

[32]  I H Bernstein,et al.  Effects of an auditory signal on visual reaction time. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[33]  J. Seal,et al.  Intensity to force translation: a new effect of stimulus-response compatibility revealed by analysis of response time and electromyographic activity of a prime mover. , 1993, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[34]  W. Levick Variation in the response latency of cat retinal ganglion cells. , 1973, Vision research.

[35]  R. Luce,et al.  Evidence from auditory simple reaction times for both change and level detectors , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[36]  Philip L. Smith Psychophysically principled models of visual simple reaction time. , 1995 .

[37]  P. Jaśkowski,et al.  Impending Electrical Shock Can Affect Response Force in a Simple Reaction Task , 1994, Perceptual and motor skills.

[38]  P C Molenaar,et al.  Steps to a formal analysis of the cognitive-energetic model of stress and human performance. , 1986, Acta psychologica.

[39]  R. Verleger,et al.  A Clock Paradigm to Study the Relationship between Expectancy and Response Force , 1993, Perceptual and motor skills.

[40]  James T. Townsend,et al.  The Stochastic Modeling of Elementary Psychological Processes , 1983 .

[41]  M. Coles Modern mind-brain reading: psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition. , 1989, Psychophysiology.

[42]  Alexa Riehle,et al.  Preparation for Action: one of the Key Functions of Motor Cortex , 2004 .

[43]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance , 2004 .

[44]  H. Philips,et al.  A Psychophysiological Investigation of Tension Headache , 1982, Headache.

[45]  C. Eriksen,et al.  An electromyographic examination of response competition , 1985 .

[46]  James T. Townsend,et al.  Toward the trichotomy method of reaction times: laying the foundation of stochastic mental networks , 1989 .

[47]  J. Deutsch,et al.  Attention: Some theoretical considerations. , 1963 .

[48]  Andries F. Sanders,et al.  The Foreperiod Effect Revisited , 1975 .

[49]  R. Ulrich,et al.  Response force is sensitive to the temporal uncertainty of response stimuli , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[50]  A. Osman,et al.  Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy. , 1990, Psychological review.

[51]  Lidewij L. van Duren,et al.  On the robustness of the additive factors stage structure in blocked and mixed choice reaction designs. , 1988, Acta psychologica.

[52]  C W Eriksen,et al.  Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[53]  J Miller,et al.  Effects of stimulus duration and intensity on simple reaction time and response force. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[54]  M. W. van der Molen,et al.  Phasic heart rate change and the U-shaped relationship between choice reaction time and auditory signal intensity. , 1980, Psychophysiology.

[55]  F. Donders On the speed of mental processes. , 1969, Acta psychologica.

[56]  F. Jaroszyk,et al.  The effect of stimulus intensity on force output in simple reaction time task in humans. , 1995, Acta neurobiologiae experimentalis.

[57]  Y Liu,et al.  Queueing network modeling of elementary mental processes. , 1996, Psychological review.

[58]  S. Hackley,et al.  Automatic alerting does not speed late motoric processes in a reaction-time task , 1998, Nature.

[59]  Cornelis H. M. Brunia,et al.  Reflexes as a tool: A window in the central nervous system , 1988 .

[60]  D L Kohfeld,et al.  Simple reaction time as a function of stimulus intensity in decibels of light and sound. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[61]  R S Nickerson,et al.  Intersensory facilitation of reaction time: energy summation or preparation enhancement? , 1973, Psychological review.

[62]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Foreperiod and simple reaction time. , 1981 .

[63]  Andries F. Sanders,et al.  S-Oh-R: Oh Stages! Oh Resources! , 1984 .