The unusual suspects: The impact of non-transport technologies on social practices and travel demand

Despite cases in which travel is undertaken purely for its own sake, travel is usually considered to be derived from a need or desire to participate in a wide range of activities – accessing people, goods, services and opportunities. People‟s schedules of activities in turn are derived from social practices (and the patterning of land use that affects where and when activities can take place). Travel demand, in part, is shaped directly and indirectly through the emergence of various kinds of technologies. Until now, discussion of emerging technologies in the transport literature has focussed on the impact of: (i) transport technologies (designed to assist traffic management and the movement of people through the transport system); and (ii) information and communication technologies (ICTs, that enable a substitution for or reorganisation of travel in time and space). This paper introduces a third type of technologies labelled „non-transport technologies‟ reflecting technologies that shape social practices causing indirect impacts on travel demand. The invention of refrigeration, for example, enabled storing food for longer periods both in shops and in homes. This facilitated weekly rather than daily shopping and was allied to economies of scale for retailers in the form of out of town supermarkets. The paper briefly outlines the interpretation of travel demand within transport studies and then goes on to examine some selected examples of past, present and future non-transport technologies exposing the possible indirect influences they can have on travel demand. This exposes that travel demand is not so much derived as embedded within networks of objects and social practices. The paper concludes with discussion of how non-transport technologies may or may not be embraced in transport debates and the policy framework. In particular there is contemplation surrounding the question of how social practices, facilitated by nontransport technologies, might adapt in a setting where travel demand becomes more restricted.

[1]  Donald MacKenzie,et al.  The social shaping of technology : how the refrigerator got its hum , 1985 .

[2]  J. Dargay,et al.  Volatility of car ownership, commutingmode and time in the UK , 2007 .

[3]  J. Urry,et al.  Travel time use in the information age , 2005 .

[4]  A. Davies,et al.  More Work for Mother: The Ironies of Household Technology from the Open Hearth to the Microwave , 1985 .

[5]  D. Metz.  The Myth of Travel Time Saving , 2008 .

[6]  Mark A. Fox,et al.  Concert Tour Success in North America: An Examination of the Top 100 Tours from 1997 to 2005 , 2007 .

[7]  Robyn Dowling,et al.  Cultures of mothering and car use in suburban Sydney: a preliminary investigation , 2000 .

[8]  Jillian Anable,et al.  Smarter choices ?changing the way we travel. Case study reports , 2004 .

[9]  John Urry,et al.  After the Car , 2009 .

[10]  Colin L. Campbell,et al.  The shopping experience , 1997 .

[11]  T. Pinch,et al.  The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other , 1984 .

[12]  A. Krueger.  The Economics of Real Superstars: The Market for Rock Concerts in the Material World , 2005, Journal of Labor Economics.

[13]  Glenn Lyons,et al.  Automobility in transition?: A socio-technical analysis of sustainable transport , 2012 .

[14]  P. Goodwin.  Transformation of transport policy in Great Britain , 1999 .

[15]  P Goodwin.  Conjectures on the dynamic functional transformation of intelligent infrastructure , 2006 .

[16]  Glenn Lyons,et al.  Introducing multitasking to the study of travel and ICT: Examining its extent and assessing its potential importance , 2007 .

[17]  Rudi Volti,et al.  America Calling: A Social History of the Telephone to 1940 , 1992 .

[18]  W. Brian Arthur,et al.  The Nature of Technology: What it Is and How it Evolves , 2009 .

[19]  M. Dijst,et al.  Shopping online and/or in-store? A structural equation model of the relationships between e-shopping and in-store shopping , 2007 .

[20]  David Banister,et al.  Influencing Mobility Outside Transport Policy , 2001 .

[21]  M. Bailey.  More Power to the Pill: The Impact of Contraceptive Freedom on Women's Life Cycle Labor Supply , 2006 .

[22]  e-Comms Team.  The King Review of low-carbon cars Part II: recommendations for action , 2008 .

[23]  G. A. Giannopoulos,et al.  The application of information and communication technologies in transport , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[24]  Alan T. Sorensen,et al.  Supply Responses to Digital Distribution: Recorded Music and Live Performances , 2012 .

[25]  Jillian Anable,et al.  Smarter choices - changing the way we travel , 2004 .

[26]  K. Small,et al.  Fuel Efficiency and Motor Vehicle Travel: The Declining Rebound Effect , 2007, Controlling Automobile Air Pollution.

[27]  John W. Sutherland,et al.  A Life-cycle Comparison of Clothes Washing Alternatives , 2007 .

[28]  Trevor Pinch,et al.  How users matter : The co-construction of users and technologies , 2003 .

[29]  N. Wrigley,et al.  Understanding Store Development Programmes in Post-Property-Crisis UK Food Retailing , 1998 .

[30]  Gregory Votolato.  Transport Design: A Travel History , 2007 .

[31]  Technology fix versus behaviour change , 2011 .

[32]  Franz Prettenthaler,et al.  From ownership to service use lifestyle: the potential of car sharing , 1999 .

[33]  G. Lyons,et al.  Transport and society1 , 2004 .

[34]  Da Wood,et al.  TRUNK ROADS AND THE GENERATION OF TRAFFIC. STANDING ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON TRUNK ROAD ASSESSMENT (SACTRA) , 1994 .

[35]  E. Tenner.  Why things bite back : technology and the revenge effect , 1996 .

[36]  Glenn Lyons,et al.  The Substitution of Communications for Travel , 2008 .

[37]  Elizabeth Shove,et al.  Defrosting the Freezer: From Novelty to Convenience , 2000 .

[38]  Patrlcla,et al.  How derived is the demand for travel ? Some conceptual and measurement considerations , 2004 .

[39]  Patricia L. Mokhtarian,et al.  Telecommuting, Residential Location, and Commute-Distance Traveled: Evidence from State of California Employees , 2003 .

[40]  J. Krige.  How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technology , 2006 .

[41]  R. Kitamura.  An evaluation of activity-based travel analysis , 1988 .

[42]  F. Geels,et al.  Failed technology futures: pitfalls and lessons from a historical survey , 2000 .

[43]  Ruth Schwartz Cowan,et al.  More Work for Mother: The Ironies of Household Technology from the Open Hearth to the Microwave , 1985 .

[44]  T. Litman.  Efficient vehicles versus efficient transportation. Comparing transportation energy conservation strategies , 2005 .

[45]  R Kitamura,et al.  AN EVALUATION OF ACTIVITY-BASED TRAVEL ANALYSIS : REVIEW PAPER , 1988 .