Evolving local climate adaptation strategies: incorporating influences of socio–economic stress

Socio-economic and climatic stresses affect local communities’ vulnerability to flooding. Better incorporation of socio-economic stress in local vulnerability assessments is important when planning for climate adaptation. This is rarely done due to insufficient understanding of their interaction, in both theory and practice. The omission leads to critical weaknesses in local adaptation strategies. This study analyses how socio-economic stress interact with climatic stress and shape local vulnerability to flooding, and how such stress can be more efficiently managed within local government organisations. A framework containing potential stresses was developed and applied to investigate how socio-economic stress affected exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity in two case studies, using interview and group exercise transcripts. Cases consisted of major development projects in two Swedish municipalities, Gothenburg and Lilla Edet. The cases were similarly exposed to climatic stress but differed in socio-economic context, and previous professional climate change experience. Fierce foreign competition and market structure were seen as the two most significant socio-economic stresses influencing local vulnerability to flooding through shaping the ‘local’ worldview. In falling order sensitivity, exposure, and adaptive capacity were seen to be influenced by the socio-economic stresses. Two approaches to efficiently incorporate climatic and socio-economic stress in local management are proposed: shifting the focus of vulnerability assessments towards future sensitivity of people and settlements, rather than on the current infrastructure’s sensitivity, would facilitate their use in planning and by ‘mainstreaming’ adaptation into long-term strategic planning vulnerability would be more dynamically addressed and periodically revised.

[1]  Saleemul Huq,et al.  Mainstreaming Adaptation in Development , 2004 .

[2]  Robin M. Leichenko,et al.  Environmental Change and Globalization: Double Exposures , 2008 .

[3]  Erik Glaas,et al.  New Levels of Climate Adaptation Policy: Analyzing the Institutional Interplay in the Baltic Sea Region , 2013 .

[4]  K. O’Brien,et al.  INTEGRAL ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE , 2010 .

[5]  Sofie Storbjörk,et al.  Governing Climate Adaptation in the Local Arena: Challenges of Risk Management and Planning in Sweden , 2007 .

[6]  Katharine Vincent,et al.  Uncertainty in adaptive capacity , 2005 .

[7]  T. Carter,et al.  Europe adapts to climate change: comparing national adaptation strategies , 2010 .

[8]  W. Adger,et al.  Successful adaptation to climate change across scales , 2005 .

[9]  Jan Sendzimir,et al.  Nested vulnerability:exploring cross-scale linkages and vulnerability teleconnections in Mexican and Vietnamese coffee systems , 2009 .

[10]  P. Bubeck,et al.  Changes in future flood risk due to climate and development in a Dutch polder area , 2010 .

[11]  Lars Otto Naess,et al.  Institutional adaptation to climate change: Flood responses at the municipal level in Norway , 2005 .

[12]  I. Ahmad Climate Policy Integration: Towards Operationalization , 2009 .

[13]  R. Leichenko,et al.  Winners and Losers in the Context of Global Change , 2003 .

[14]  J. R. Wilcox,et al.  Understanding Organizational Culture , 1988 .

[15]  Robin M. Leichenko,et al.  The Dynamics of Rural Vulnerability to Global Change: The Case of southern Africa , 2002 .

[16]  Inge Svedung,et al.  Management of risks in societal planning – an analysis of scope and variety of health, safety and security issues in municipality plan documents , 2006 .

[17]  L. Lundqvist,et al.  Organizational Culture, Professional Role Conceptions and Local Swedish Decision-makers' Views on Climate Policy Instruments , 2006 .

[18]  E. Carina H. Keskitalo,et al.  Vulnerability and adaptive capacity in forestry in northern Europe: a Swedish case study , 2008 .

[19]  Lynn P. Nygaard,et al.  Mapping vulnerability to multiple stressors: climate change and globalization in India , 2004 .

[20]  Robin M. Leichenko,et al.  Double exposure: assessing the impacts of climate change within the context of economic globalization , 2000 .

[21]  R. Pulwarty,et al.  Assessment of adaptation practices, options, constraints and capacity , 2007 .

[22]  Erik Glaas,et al.  Managing climate change vulnerabilities: formal institutions and knowledge use as determinants of adaptive capacity at the local level in Sweden , 2010 .

[23]  Sofie Storbjörk,et al.  ‘It Takes More to Get a Ship to Change Course’: Barriers for Organizational Learning and Local Climate Adaptation in Sweden , 2010 .

[24]  Roger Few,et al.  Scenario-based stakeholder engagement: incorporating stakeholders preferences into coastal planning for climate change. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[25]  Robin M. Leichenko,et al.  Environmental Change and Globalization , 2008 .

[26]  H. Eakin Institutional change, climate risk, and rural vulnerability: Cases from Central Mexico , 2005 .

[27]  Richard J. T. Klein,et al.  Climate Change Vulnerability Assessments: An Evolution of Conceptual Thinking , 2006 .

[28]  medolbec Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity , 2010 .

[29]  E. Keskitalo,et al.  Climate Change and Globalization in the Arctic: An Integrated Approach to Vulnerability Assessment , 2012 .

[30]  B. Smit,et al.  Multiple exposures and dynamic vulnerability: Evidence from the grape industry in the Okanagan Valley, Canada , 2006 .

[31]  M. Alvesson Understanding organizational culture , 2002 .

[32]  Benjamin L. Preston,et al.  Climate adaptation planning in practice: an evaluation of adaptation plans from three developed nations , 2011 .

[33]  A. Jordan,et al.  Does public policy support or undermine climate change adaptation? Exploring policy interplay across different scales of governance , 2008 .

[34]  Roger M. Cooke,et al.  Towards a causal model for air transport safety—an ongoing research project , 2006 .