Comparative ecology of clonal plants

Somatic embryogenesis is a phylogenetically ancient trait that allows sessile plants to grow in a modular fashion and to respond plastically to different environmental cues. It facilitates damage repair and permits clonal growth, the capacity to produce potentially independent but genetically identical offspring. Clonal growth is observed to originate from both the shoot or the root part of the plant body and it has been assigned various ecological functions such as reproduction, exploitation and persistence. These functions are rooted in two basic morphological characteristics of clonal growth: the longevity and the length of the connection between clonal parts. Clonality, although an ancient trait, shows a polyphyletic distribution among plant taxa with a strong representation especially among monocots. Phylogenetically controlled comparisons show that clonality is more common among species that occur in cold or nutrient-poor habitats and under poor light conditions. The frequent occurrence of clonals among aquatic species is confounded by the fact that many aquatics are monocots. This however does not necessarily preclude a functional ecological explanation. It is further shown that longevity and length of connection covary negatively, yielding two distinct clonal growth strategies (fragmenting versus compact, persistent clones) with a preference for the more common habitat trait combinations: nutrient-rich, shaded and/or wet versus nutrient-poor, open and/or dry, respectively.

[1]  H. Kroon,et al.  Organ preformation, development, and resource allocation in perennials. , 1997 .

[2]  H. Kroon,et al.  Exploitation of environmental heterogeneity by spatial division of labour in a clonal plant. , 1996 .

[3]  Michelle R. Leishman,et al.  On misinterpreting the phylogenetic correction , 1995 .

[4]  P. Harvey,et al.  Why Ecologists Need to be Phylogenetically Challenged , 1995 .

[5]  Andrew Rambaut,et al.  Comparative analysis by independent contrasts (CAIC): an Apple Macintosh application for analysing comparative data , 1995, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[6]  H. Kroon,et al.  Morphological plasticity in clonal plants: the foraging concept reconsidered. , 1995 .

[7]  H. Kroon,et al.  High benefits of clonal integration in two stoloniferous species, in response to heterogeneous light environments , 1994 .

[8]  J. Silvertown,et al.  Tiller dynamics of two grasses: responses to grazing, density and weather , 1994 .

[9]  M. Cain Consequences of Foraging in Clonal Plant Species , 1994 .

[10]  Beáta Oborny,et al.  Growth rules in clonal plants and environmental predictability - A simulation study , 1994 .

[11]  H. Kroon,et al.  Foraging in Plants: the Role of Morphological Plasticity in Resource Acquisition , 1994 .

[12]  O. Eriksson,et al.  Dynamics of genets in cluonal plants. , 1993, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[13]  James F. Smith Phylogenetics of seed plants : An analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL , 1993 .

[14]  Douglas McCormick,et al.  The Evolutionary Method , 1992, Bio/Technology.

[15]  B. Carlsson,et al.  Clonal plants and environmental change : Introduction to the proceedings and summary , 1992 .

[16]  A. Bell,et al.  Plant Form: An Illustrated Guide to Flowering Plant Morphology , 1991 .

[17]  B. Carlsson,et al.  Programmed tiller differentiation, intraclonal density regulation and nutrient dynamics in Carex bigelowii , 1990 .

[18]  H. Kroon,et al.  CLONAL GROWTH IN PLANTS: REGULATION AND FUNCTION , 1990 .

[19]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  The Ecology and Economics of Storage in Plants , 1990 .

[20]  T. Vuorisalo,et al.  Hierarchical selection in modular organisms. , 1989, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[21]  W. Sutherland,et al.  The Foraging Tactics of Plants , 1988 .

[22]  M. Hutchings,et al.  The Effects of Light Intensity on Foraging in the Clonal Herb Glechoma Hederacea , 1987 .

[23]  N. Ellstrand,et al.  Patterns of Genotypic Diversity in Clonal Plant Species , 1987 .

[24]  J. Felsenstein Phylogenies and the Comparative Method , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[25]  K. Niklas,et al.  Clonal growth in land plants: a paleobotanical perspective , 1985 .

[26]  B. Casper,et al.  MORPHOGENETIC CONSTRAINTS ON PATTERNS OF CARBON DISTRIBUTION IN PLANTS , 1984 .

[27]  L. L. Doust,et al.  Population dynamics and local specialization in a clonal perennial (Ranunculus repens). I. The dynamics of ramets in contrasting habitats , 1981 .

[28]  S. Gould,et al.  The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[29]  J. Harper Population Biology of Plants , 1979 .

[30]  W. D. Billings,et al.  Carbohydrate Accumulation in Tundra Graminoid Plants as a Function of Season and Tissue Age , 1976 .

[31]  E. J. Kraus The Reproductive Capacity of Plants , 1943, Ecology.

[32]  W. Rauh Die Bildung von Hypokotyl- und Wurzelsprossen und ihre Bedeutung für die Wuchsformen der Pflanzen , 1937 .

[33]  W. Troll Vergleichende Morphologie der höheren Pflanzen , 1936 .

[34]  J. Velenovský Vergleichende Morphologie der Pflanzen , 1905 .

[35]  Thilo Irmisch Zur Morphologie der monokotylischen Knollen- und Zwiebelgewächse , 1850 .