Despite the recent prominence of social capital theory, few scholars have addressed how social capital concepts might impact social justice advocacy. We argue that a client-centered social capital model, emphasizing networks and norms that affect our clients, provides a framework for social justice lawyers to address clients' needs. We show how networks and norms map onto a debate over two strategies for social justice lawyering, namely community lawyering and impact litigation. Social capital analysis helps predict which of these strategies might be more effective in a given situation. Further, we show how a client-centered social capital framework can illuminate some internal disagreements between social justice lawyers. Some internal disagreements within the social justice community can be better understood as debates over the relative value of bonding social capital versus bridging social capital, where bonding capital exists between members of a self-identified group, and bridging capital exists between members of different groups. At several points we draw examples from the Post-Katrina New Orleans Social Justice Docket, an attempt to comprehensively catalog the major social justice-related litigation and advocacy efforts in New Orleans since Hurricane Katrina struck the region in 2005.
[1]
J. Street.
The Lost Promise of Civil Rights
,
2008
.
[2]
Susan D. Greenbaum.
Poverty and the Willful Destruction of Social Capital: Displacement and Dispossession in African American Communities
,
2008
.
[3]
Mario Diani,et al.
The Integrative Power of Civic Networks1
,
2007,
American Journal of Sociology.
[4]
J. Mclellan,et al.
Social capital and identity politics among Asian Buddhists in Toronto
,
2005
.
[5]
Madeleine Leonard,et al.
Bonding and Bridging Social Capital: Reflections from Belfast
,
2004
.
[6]
N. Morrison.
Neighbourhoods and Social Cohesion: Experiences from Europe
,
2003
.
[7]
X. Briggs.
Doing Democracy Up-Close: Culture, Power, and Communication in Community Building:
,
1998
.