Farming system modelling for agri-environmental policy design: The case of a spatially non-aggregated allocation of conservation measures

This paper addresses the issue of designing policies for habitat conservation on agricultural land. The case under study requires a non-aggregated spatial distribution of the fields to be enrolled in an agri-environmental programme. A spatially explicit mathematical programming farm-based model, which accounts for three spatial levels (field, farm and landscape), is coupled with a relevant spatial pattern index (the Ripley L-function) to analyse the design and implementation of an agri-environmental programme aimed to preserve the Tetrax tetrax in the Plaine de Niort, France. The model is run using a stylised map with heterogeneous soil types and both crop growing and mixed dairy farms. Results show that valuable insights into agri-environmental programme design are gained through a detailed representation of farming system management. The suitable, non-aggregated spatial pattern for T. tetrax conservation is more costly than less-suitable, more aggregated patterns, because it tends to require equal participation of all farms. The policy simulations reveal that the various spatial patterns can be obtained through relatively simple uniform contract structures. An effective contract structure entails a set of two degressive payments which encourages all farms to enrol at least a small share of their land in the program.

[1]  V. Bretagnolle,et al.  Predicting short-term extinction risk for the declining Little Bustard (Tetrax tetrax) in intensive agricultural habitats , 2005 .

[2]  F. Jiguet.  Arthropods in diet of Little Bustards Tetrax tetrax during the breeding season in western France , 2002 .

[3]  F. Jiguet,et al.  Resource defence on exploded leks: do male little bustards, T. tetrax, control resources for females? , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  R. Bunce,et al.  Changes in the abundance of farmland birds in relation to the timing of agricultural intensification in England and Wales , 2000 .

[5]  Frank Wätzold,et al.  Spatially Uniform versus Spatially Heterogeneous Compensation Payments for Biodiversity-Enhancing Land-Use Measures , 2005 .

[6]  Charles S. ReVelle,et al.  Spatial attributes and reserve design models: A review , 2005 .

[7]  J. A. Renkema,et al.  Location-Specific Modeling For Optimizing Wildlife Management On Crop Farms , 2004 .

[8]  G.A.A. Wossink,et al.  Environmental-economic policy assessment: A farm economic approach , 1992 .

[9]  R. Green,et al.  Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe's farmland bird populations , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  Claire A. Montgomery,et al.  Modeling joint production of wildlife and timber , 2004 .

[11]  Prairies et cultures fourragères : Quels enjeux pour les oiseaux dans les milieux céréaliers intensifs ? , 2004 .

[12]  Jamie B. Kirkpatrick,et al.  An iterative method for establishing priorities for the selection of nature reserves: An example from Tasmania , 1983 .

[13]  S. Polasky,et al.  Selecting Biological Reserves Cost-Effectively: An Application to Terrestrial Vertebrate Conservation in Oregon , 2001, Land Economics.

[14]  S. Polasky,et al.  CONSERVING SPECIES IN A WORKING LANDSCAPE: LAND USE WITH BIOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC OBJECTIVES , 2005 .

[15]  Jean-Louis Martin,et al.  The benefits of extensive agriculture to birds: the case of the little bustard , 2001 .

[16]  Martin Drechsler,et al.  A model-based approach for designing cost-effective compensation payments for conservation of endangered species in real landscapes , 2007 .

[17]  Deborah J. Pain,et al.  Farming and birds in Europe: the common agricultural policy and its implications for bird conservation , 1997 .

[18]  Claire A. Montgomery,et al.  Where to put things? Spatial land management to sustain biodiversity and economic returns , 2008 .

[19]  M. Appelt,et al.  Metapopulation dynamics in a regional population of the blue-winged grasshopper (Oedipoda caerulescens; Linnaeus, 1758) , 1997, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[20]  S. Ekman.  Cost‐effective nitrogen leaching reduction as influenced by linkages between farm‐level decisions , 2005 .

[21]  V. Bretagnolle,et al.  L'OUTARDE CANEPETIÈRE EN FRANCE : ÉVOLUTION RÉCENTE DES POPULATIONS, BILAN DES MESURES DE SAUVEGARDE ET PERSPECTIVES D'AVENIR , 2002 .

[22]  Peter J. Diggle,et al.  Statistical analysis of spatial point patterns , 1983 .

[23]  Jean-Louis Martin,et al.  Landscape context and little bustard abundance in a fragmented steppe: implications for reserve management in mosaic landscapes , 2002 .

[24]  J. Peerlings,et al.  Agri-environmental contracting of Dutch dairy farms: the role of manure policies and the occurrence of lock-in , 2008 .

[25]  P. Haase.  Spatial pattern analysis in ecology based on Ripley's K-function: Introduction and methods of edge correction , 1995 .

[26]  Florence Jacquet,et al.  Joint production under uncertainty and multifunctionality of agriculture: policy considerations and applied analysis , 2005 .

[27]  Frank Wätzold,et al.  An ecological-economic modelling procedure to design compensation payments for the efficient spatio-temporal allocation of species protection measures , 2002 .

[28]  A. Plantinga,et al.  Targeting Incentives to Reduce Habitat Fragmentation , 2009 .

[29]  Paul H. Williams,et al.  What to protect?—Systematics and the agony of choice , 1991 .

[30]  Ada Wossink,et al.  Co-ordinating economic, behavioural and spatial aspects of wildlife preservation in agriculture , 1999 .

[31]  Martin Drechsler,et al.  Smart spatial incentives for market-based conservation , 2008, 0809.0228.

[32]  Pierre Dupraz,et al.  An Investigation of Policy Administrative Costs Using Panel Data for the English Environmentally Sensitive Areas , 2008 .

[33]  Martin Drechsler,et al.  An agglomeration payment for cost-effective biodiversity conservation in spatially structured landscapes , 2010 .

[34]  K. Falconer.  Farm-level constraints on agri-environmental scheme participation: a transactional perspective. , 2000 .

[35]  Tomas Pärt,et al.  Influence of Landscape Scale on Farmland Birds Breeding in Semi‐Natural Pastures , 2000 .

[36]  D. Noble,et al.  Developing indicators for European birds , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  C. Moreau,et al.  Habitat selection by Little Bustard Tetrax tetrax in a cultivated area of France , 1999 .

[38]  J. Settele,et al.  Estimating optimal conservation in the context of agri-environmental schemes , 2008 .

[39]  J. Peerlings,et al.  Wildlife and landscape services production in Dutch dairy farming; jointness and transaction costs , 2004 .

[40]  Jason F. Shogren,et al.  Spatial incentives to coordinate contiguous habitat , 2007 .

[41]  R. Chambers.  On the Design of Agricultural Policy Mechanisms , 1989 .

[42]  David J. Lewis,et al.  Policies for Habitat Fragmentation: Combining Econometrics with GIS-Based Landscape Simulations , 2007, Land Economics.

[43]  Stephen Hynes,et al.  Modelling habitat conservation and participation in agri-environmental schemes: A spatial microsimulation approach , 2008 .

[44]  Katherine Falconer,et al.  Pesticide taxation and multi-objective policy-making: farm modelling to evaluate profit/environment trade-offs , 2001 .

[45]  Amy W. Ando,et al.  Species distributions, land values, and efficient conservation , 1998, Science.

[46]  J. Franklin,et al.  Second-Order Neighborhood Analysis of Mapped Point Patterns , 1987 .

[47]  S. Polasky,et al.  Integrating economic costs into conservation planning. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[48]  F. Jiguet,et al.  Lek mating systems: a case study in the Little Bustard Tetrax tetrax , 2000, Behavioural Processes.

[49]  B. Ripley.  Modelling Spatial Patterns , 1977 .

[50]  Patrick Veysset,et al.  Adaptation to Agenda 2000 (CAP reform) and optimisation of the farming system of French suckler cattle farms in the Charolais area: a model-based study , 2005 .