High-field proton MRS of human brain.

Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) of the brain reveals specific biochemical information about cerebral metabolites, which may support clinical diagnoses and enhance the understanding of neurological disorders. The advantages of performing 1H-MRS at higher field strengths include better signal to noise ratio (SNR) and increased spectral, spatial and temporal resolution, allowing the acquisition of high quality, easily quantifiable spectra in acceptable imaging times. In addition to improved measurement precision of N-acetylaspartate, choline, creatine and myo-inositol, high-field systems allow the high-resolution measurement of other metabolites, such as glutamate, glutamine, gamma-aminobutyric acid, scyllo-inositol, aspartate, taurine, N-acetylaspartylglutamate, glucose and branched amino acids, thus extending the range of metabolic information. However, these advantages may be hampered by intrinsic field-dependent technical difficulties, such as decreased T2 signal, chemical shift dispersion errors, J-modulation anomalies, increased magnetic susceptibility, eddy current artifacts, limitations in the design of homogeneous and sensitive radiofrequency (RF) coils, magnetic field instability and safety issues. Several studies demonstrated that these limitations could be overcome, suggesting that the appropriate optimization of high-field 1H-MRS would expand the application in the fields of clinical research and diagnostic routine.

[1]  K. Uğurbil,et al.  Microstrip RF surface coil design for extremely high‐field MRI and spectroscopy , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  Felix W. Wehrli,et al.  In vivo MR micro imaging with conventional radiofrequency coils cooled to 77°K , 2000 .

[3]  S. Bluml,et al.  Magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the human brain , 2001, The Anatomical record.

[4]  J. R. Baker,et al.  Echoplanar chemical shift imaging , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  Hiroto Hatabu,et al.  MR imaging at high magnetic fields. , 2003, European journal of radiology.

[6]  E. Atalar,et al.  Ultimate intrinsic signal‐to‐noise ratio in MRI , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  O. Gonen,et al.  SNR versus resolution in 3D 1H MRS of the human brain at high magnetic fields , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  L. Wald,et al.  Lactate detection at 3T: Compensating J coupling effects with BASING , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[9]  P. Barker,et al.  Single‐voxel proton MRS of the human brain at 1.5T and 3.0T , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  Robert Bartha,et al.  Quantitative proton short‐echo‐time LASER spectroscopy of normal human white matter and hippocampus at 4 Tesla incorporating macromolecule subtraction , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  E Moser,et al.  Proton T 1 and T 2 relaxation times of human brain metabolites at 3 Tesla , 2001, NMR in biomedicine.

[12]  Frank G Shellock,et al.  Biomedical implants and devices: Assessment of magnetic field interactions with a 3.0‐Tesla MR system , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[13]  U. Klose In vivo proton spectroscopy in presence of eddy currents , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  Jullie W Pan,et al.  Biological and clinical MRS at ultra‐high field , 1997, NMR in biomedicine.

[15]  L. Dougherty,et al.  A direct comparison of signal behavior between 4.0 and 1.5 T: a phantom study. , 2003, European journal of radiology.

[16]  I. Smith,et al.  Magnetic resonance spectroscopy in medicine: clinical impact , 2002 .

[17]  F. Di Salle,et al.  Proton MRS in neurological disorders. , 1999, European journal of radiology.

[18]  P M Parizel,et al.  Understanding chemical shift induced boundary artefacts as a function of field strength: influence of imaging parameters (bandwidth, field-of-view, and matrix size). , 1994, European journal of radiology.

[19]  S. Holtås,et al.  Proton MR spectroscopy in clinical routine , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[20]  V A Stenger,et al.  Three‐dimensional tailored RF pulses for the reduction of susceptibility artifacts in T*2‐weighted functional MRI , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  M Alecci,et al.  Radio frequency magnetic field mapping of a 3 Tesla birdcage coil: Experimental and theoretical dependence on sample properties , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  K Wüthrich,et al.  NMR spectroscopy of large molecules and multimolecular assemblies in solution. , 1999, Current opinion in structural biology.

[23]  K. Uğurbil,et al.  Study of tricarboxylic acid cycle flux changes in human visual cortex during hemifield visual stimulation using 1H‐{13C} MRS and fMRI , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  F. Shellock,et al.  8.0‐Tesla human MR system: Temperature changes associated with radiofrequency‐induced heating of a head phantom , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[25]  R. Goebel,et al.  7T vs. 4T: RF power, homogeneity, and signal‐to‐noise comparison in head images , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  Ewald Moser,et al.  High‐resolution 3D proton spectroscopic imaging of the human brain at 3 T: SNR issues and application for anatomy‐matched voxel sizes , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[27]  Peter Andersen,et al.  Proton T2 relaxation study of water, N‐acetylaspartate, and creatine in human brain using Hahn and Carr‐Purcell spin echoes at 4T and 7T , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[28]  Rolf Gruetter,et al.  Direct in vivo measurement of human cerebral GABA concentration using MEGA‐editing at 7 Tesla , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[29]  K. Uğurbil,et al.  Subchronic In Vivo Effects of a High Static Magnetic Field (9.4 T) in Rats , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[30]  K Ugurbil,et al.  In vivo 1H NMR spectroscopy of the human brain at 7 T , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[31]  Peter Jezzard,et al.  Theoretical and experimental evaluation of detached endcaps for 3 T birdcage coils , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[32]  Matthew Brett,et al.  An Evaluation of the Use of Magnetic Field Maps to Undistort Echo-Planar Images , 2003, NeuroImage.

[33]  R. Menon,et al.  Comparison of the quantification precision of human short echo time 1H spectroscopy at 1.5 and 4.0 Tesla , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[34]  Stefan Posse,et al.  Anomalous Transverse Relaxation in 1H Spectroscopy in Human Brain at 4 Tesla , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[35]  R Gruetter,et al.  Toward an in vivo neurochemical profile: quantification of 18 metabolites in short-echo-time (1)H NMR spectra of the rat brain. , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[36]  K. Uğurbil,et al.  Resolution improvements in in vivo 1H NMR spectra with increased magnetic field strength. , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[37]  V B Ho,et al.  Chemical shift: the artifact and clinical tool revisited. , 1999, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[38]  Yihong Yang,et al.  Single-Shot Interleaved Z-Shim EPI with Optimized Compensation for Signal Losses due to Susceptibility-Induced Field Inhomogeneity at 3 T , 2002, NeuroImage.

[39]  E Moser,et al.  Multivoxel 3D proton spectroscopy in the brain at 1.5 versus 3.0 T: signal-to-noise ratio and resolution comparison. , 2001, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[40]  G. Elbel,et al.  Phase coherent averaging in magnetic resonance spectroscopy using interleaved navigator scans: Compensation of motion artifacts and magnetic field instabilities , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[41]  A. Kangarlu,et al.  Cognitive, cardiac, and physiological safety studies in ultra high field magnetic resonance imaging. , 1999, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[42]  Lawrence Dougherty,et al.  Abdominal imaging at 4 T MR system: a preliminary result. , 2003, European journal of radiology.

[43]  A. Caprihan,et al.  A programmable pre‐emphasis system , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.