Evaluation of a new method of irrigation and aspiration for removal of ophthalmic viscoelastic device during cataract surgery in a porcine model

[1]  Y. Ohashi,et al.  New side-view imaging technique for observing posterior chamber structures during cataract surgery in porcine eyes , 2013, BMC Ophthalmology.

[2]  I. Francis,et al.  Assessment of adequate removal of ophthalmic viscoelastic device with irrigation/aspiration by quantifying intraocular lens ‘Judders’ , 2013, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[3]  T. Oshika,et al.  Visualization of irrigation fluid flow and calculation of its velocity distribution in the anterior chamber by particle image velocimetry , 2012, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[4]  Satish S. Modi,et al.  Safety, efficacy, and intraoperative characteristics of DisCoVisc and Healon ophthalmic viscosurgical devices for cataract surgery , 2011 .

[5]  R. Noecker,et al.  Recurrent enterococcal endophthalmitis seeded by an intraocular lens biofilm. , 2011, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[6]  Y. Ohashi,et al.  Influence of elevated intraocular pressure on the posterior chamber-anterior hyaloid membrane barrier during cataract operations. , 2011, Archives of ophthalmology.

[7]  R. Dimalanta,et al.  Bead‐flow pattern: Quantitation of fluid movement during torsional and longitudinal phacoemulsification , 2010, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[8]  S. Fukuda,et al.  Experimental use of estriol for visualizing the vitreous body in the anterior chamber after posterior capsule rupture in animal models , 2009, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[9]  Y. Ohashi,et al.  Disruption of the posterior chamber-anterior hyaloid membrane barrier during phacoemulsification and aspiration as revealed by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. , 2009, Archives of ophthalmology.

[10]  D. R. Mercer,et al.  Digital Image Analysis to Estimate Numbers of Aedes Eggs Oviposited in Containers , 2008, Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association.

[11]  M. Gilmore,et al.  Contribution of secreted proteases to the pathogenesis of postoperative Enterococcus faecalis endophthalmitis , 2008, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[12]  R. Menapace,et al.  Comparison of the effect of Viscoat and DuoVisc on postoperative intraocular pressure after small‐incision cataract surgery , 2008, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[13]  H. Bissen-Miyajima.  In vitro behavior of ophthalmic viscosurgical devices during phacoemulsification , 2006, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[14]  T. Oshika,et al.  Retention and removal of a new viscous dispersive ophthalmic viscosurgical device during cataract surgery in animal eyes , 2006, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[15]  Y. Ohashi,et al.  Postoperative low-grade endophthalmitis caused by biofilm-producing coccus bacteria attached to posterior surface of intraocular lens. , 2005, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[16]  D. Apple,et al.  Removal times and techniques of a viscoadaptive ophthalmic viscosurgical device , 2004, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[17]  N. Mamalis,et al.  Revised Miyake-Apple technique for postmortem eye preparation. , 2004, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[18]  T. Oshika,et al.  Clinical comparison of Healon5 and Healon in phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation: Randomized multicenter study , 2003, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[19]  A. Bayer,et al.  The effect of intraoperative antibiotics in irrigating solutions on aqueous humor contamination and endophthalmitis after phacoemulsification surgery. , 2003, European journal of ophthalmology.

[20]  D. Albiani,et al.  Intraocular pressure after bilateral cataract surgery using Healon, Healon5, and Healon GV , 2002, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[21]  M. Tetz,et al.  Effect of healon5 and 4 other viscoelastic substances on intraocular pressure and endothelium after cataract surgery , 2001, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[22]  C. Hoffmann,et al.  Intraocular bacterial contamination during sutureless, small incision, single‐port phacoemulsification , 2000, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[23]  A. Tarkkanen,et al.  Prospective evaluation of external ocular microbial growth and aqueous humor contamination during cataract surgery. , 1999, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[24]  K. Olander,et al.  Comparison of the effect of four viscoelastic agents on early postoperative intraocular pressure , 1996, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[25]  D. Koch,et al.  Evaluation of intraocular pressure with Healon and Healon GV in sutureless cataract surgery with foldable lens implantation , 1996, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[26]  P. Marsh,et al.  Anterior chamber aspirate cultures in small incision cataract surgery. , 1995, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[27]  L. Probst,et al.  Phacoemulsification with aspirated or retained Viscoat , 1994, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[28]  A. Storr‐Paulsen.  Analysis of the short‐term effect of two viscoelastic agents on the intraocular pressure after extracapsular cataract extraction , 1993, Acta ophthalmologica.

[29]  D. Apple,et al.  Preparation and study of human eyes obtained postmortem with the Miyake posterior photographic technique. , 1990, Ophthalmology.

[30]  K. Miyake,et al.  Intraoperative posterior chamber lens haptic fixation in the human cadaver eye. , 1985, Ophthalmic surgery.