A novel family of non-parametric cumulative based divergences for point processes

Hypothesis testing on point processes has several applications such as model fitting, plasticity detection, and non-stationarity detection. Standard tools for hypothesis testing include tests on mean firing rate and time varying rate function. However, these statistics do not fully describe a point process, and therefore, the conclusions drawn by these tests can be misleading. In this paper, we introduce a family of non-parametric divergence measures for hypothesis testing. A divergence measure compares the full probability structure and, therefore, leads to a more robust test of hypothesis. We extend the traditional Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Cramer-von-Mises tests to the space of spike trains via stratification, and show that these statistics can be consistently estimated from data without any free parameter. We demonstrate an application of the proposed divergences as a cost function to find optimally matched point processes.

[1]  Hatim A. Zariwala,et al.  Neural correlates, computation and behavioural impact of decision confidence , 2008, Nature.

[2]  José Carlos Príncipe,et al.  Quantification of inter-trial non-stationarity in spike trains from periodically stimulated neural cultures , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[3]  R. Johansson,et al.  First spikes in ensembles of human tactile afferents code complex spatial fingertip events , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  Daryl J. Daley,et al.  An Introduction to the Theory of Point Processes , 2013 .

[5]  R. Reid,et al.  Precise Firing Events Are Conserved across Neurons , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  A Kernel Method for the Two-Sample-Problem , 2006, NIPS.

[7]  C. D. Kemp,et al.  Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis , 1987 .

[8]  T. W. Anderson On the Distribution of the Two-Sample Cramer-von Mises Criterion , 1962 .

[9]  G. Fasano,et al.  A multidimensional version of the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test , 1987 .

[10]  William Bialek,et al.  Spikes: Exploring the Neural Code , 1996 .

[11]  M. DeWeese,et al.  Binary Spiking in Auditory Cortex , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  Don H. Johnson,et al.  Information-Theoretic Analysis of Neural Coding , 2004, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[13]  Jonathan D Victor,et al.  Spike train metrics , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[14]  Stefan Rotter,et al.  Higher-Order Statistics of Input Ensembles and the Response of Simple Model Neurons , 2003, Neural Computation.

[15]  Stefan Rotter,et al.  Measurement of variability dynamics in cortical spike trains , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[16]  Sander M. Bohte,et al.  Reducing the Variability of Neural Responses: A Computational Theory of Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity , 2007, Neural Computation.

[17]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Regulation of spike timing in visual cortical circuits , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.