Prognostic factors for the surgical management of peripheral nerve lesions.

Although the evaluation and treatment of patients with peripheral nerve injuries has evolved and improved over the years, there are still some arguments on the methods and results of surgery. We reviewed retrospectively the clinical, electrophysiological and surgical characteristics of peripheral nerve lesions for 1,636 nerves in 1,565 patients who had been managed in our department in a 10-year period. The most common cause of injuries was gunshot wound in 56.3% of all patients, followed by sharp lacerations (20.6%), fractures (10.6%) and tractions (5.1%). Among 1,636 cases of nerve injuries, the most frequently wounded nerve was median nerve (32.3%), followed by ulnar (24.1%), radial (12.1%), sciatic (10.7%) and peroneal nerves (7.7%), and brachial plexus (7.7%). Simple decompression was the most preferred technique for nerve repair in 27.8%. The electrophysiological improvement was observed in 66.8%, as assessed by electromyography. Clinical improvement was found in 58.4%, as judged by muscle strength grading. If the nerve is compressed or contused, but remains intact, the improvement is satisfactory after surgery. The type of injury, its time of occurrence, initial deficit, and degree of recovery expected are important issues in establishing the treatment plan, which may range from skilled observation to extensive surgical intervention.

[1]  I. Whitworth Surgical Disorders of the Peripheral Nerves. , 1999, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[2]  L. Myles,et al.  Effects of different methods of peripheral nerve repair on the number and distribution of muscle afferent neurons in rat dorsal root ganglion. , 1992, Journal of neurosurgery.

[3]  W. Hop,et al.  Long-term results of transplantations to repair median, ulnar, and radial nerve lesions by a microsurgical interfascicular autogenous cable graft technique. , 1992, Surgical neurology.

[4]  J. Haase,et al.  Median and ulnar nerve transections treated with microsurgical interfascicular cable grafting with autogenous sural nerve. , 1980, Journal of neurosurgery.

[5]  D. Kline,et al.  Experimental interfascicular nerve grafting. , 1979, Journal of neurosurgery.

[6]  R. Clemens [Acute injuries of peripheral nerves. 2. Special indications for treatment]. , 1977, Fortschritte der Medizin.

[7]  W. J. Brown,et al.  Comparison of fascicular, interfascicular and epineural suture techniques in the repair of simple nerve lacerations. , 1977, Journal of neurosurgery.

[8]  A. Berger,et al.  Further experience with interfascicular grafting of the median, ulnar, and radial nerves. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  G. J. Romanes,et al.  Current Problems of Lower Vertebrate Phylogeny. , 1969 .

[10]  H. J. Seddon,et al.  THREE TYPES OF NERVE INJURY , 1943 .

[11]  L. Davis,et al.  Trauma severity indices , 2004 .

[12]  G. Brunelli,et al.  Strategy and timing of peripheral nerve surgery , 2004, Neurosurgical Review.

[13]  M. E. Harris,et al.  Techniques of peripheral nerve repair. , 1991, Neurosurgery clinics of North America.

[14]  A. Ratliff,et al.  Peripheral Nerve Injuries , 1989 .

[15]  L. Kempe Surgery of Peripheral Nerves , 1970 .