Relationship between Pre-incubation Egg Parameters and Chick Weight after Hatching in Layer Breeds

The aim of the studywas to define the egg parameters, which could be measured on an intact egg prior to incubation, to accuratelypredict chick weight after hatching. The eggs from laying hens of the White Leghorn, Rhode Island White and Rhode Island Red parent stocks were investigated. The results showed that egg volume (coefficient of variation CV = 6� 9%) and weight (CV = 6� 2%) were the most variable egg parameters as compared with less variable egg surface area (CV = 4� 5%) and density (CV = 3� 1%). There was no significant inter-strain difference in egg weight. Other egg parameters such as volume, shell surface area, density, and egg–chick weight ratios differed significantly. Chick weights differed significantly onlybetween the White Leghorn and Rhode Island White lines. Egg densitywas chosen as an indirect indicator of shell thickness and/or shell density, but the correlation between chick weight and egg density was too small (correlation coefficient R =0 � 02) to state that shell parameters influence much chick weight. Egg weight alone had the biggest correlation with chick weight (R =0 � 56) in comparison with egg volume (R =0 � 50) and surface area (R =0 � 50) for the combined data across three strains. The accuracyof the results of chick weights predicted bythe proposed mathematical equations and expressed in terms of coefficient of determination R 2 varied from 0� 250 to 0� 615, depending on the strain data and the type of the predictive formula. The best prediction was obtained for the quadratic type of the equation when three basic egg parameters (weight, volume and surface area) were considered. # 2002 Silsoe Research Institute. Published byElsevier

[1]  H. R. Wilson,et al.  Effects of egg size on hatchability, chick size and posthatching growth. , 1990 .

[2]  Bernard R. Rosner,et al.  Fundamentals of Biostatistics. , 1992 .

[3]  V. Narushin,et al.  The Avian Egg: Geometrical Description and Calculation of Parameters , 1997 .

[4]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research , 1969 .

[5]  V. Narushin,et al.  AP—Animal Production Technology: Shape Geometry of the Avian Egg , 2001 .

[6]  F. Proudfoot,et al.  The Influence of Hatching Egg Size on the Subsequent Performance of Broiler Chickens , 1981 .

[7]  Y. Pinchasov Relationship between the weight of hatching eggs and subsequent early performance of broiler chicks. , 1991, British poultry science.

[8]  M. Shanawany Hatching weight in relation to egg weight in domestic birds , 1987 .

[9]  H. R. Wilson,et al.  The Use of Egg Weight and Chick Weight Coefficients of Variation as Quality Indicators in Hatchery Management , 1993 .

[10]  S. Mishra,et al.  INTERRELATIONSHIPS AMONG EGG WEIGHT, HATCHABILITY, CHICK WEIGHT, POST HATCH PERFORMANCE AND REARING METHOD IN BROILER BREEDERS , 1997 .

[11]  A. Tserveni-Gousi,et al.  Quality characteristics of pheasant eggs and effect of egg weight and shell quality on chick weight , 1990 .

[12]  A. S. Tserveni-Gousi Relationship between parental age, egg weight and hatching weight of Japanese quail. , 1987, British poultry science.

[13]  H. R. Wilson Interrelationships of egg size, chick size, posthatching growth and hatchability , 1991 .

[14]  Hilbert Schenck,et al.  Theories Of Engineering Experimentation , 1979 .

[15]  Alexis L. Romanoff,et al.  The avian egg , 1949 .

[16]  A. Tserveni-Gousi,et al.  Relationship of parents' age, hatching egg weight, and shell quality to day-old chick weight as influenced by oviposition time. , 1987, Poultry science.

[17]  M. Shanawany Inter-relationship between egg weight, parental age and embryonic development. , 1984, British poultry science.

[18]  H. Pasternak,et al.  Incremental changes in and distribution of chick weight with hen age in four poultry species. , 1995, British poultry science.