Top 50 most wanted fungi

Environmental sequencing regularly recovers fungi that cannot be classified to any meaningful taxonomic level beyond “Fungi”. There are several examples where evidence of such lineages has been sitting in public sequence databases for up to ten years before receiving scientific attention and formal recognition. In order to highlight these unidentified lineages for taxonomic scrutiny, a search function is presented that produces updated lists of approximately genus-level clusters of fungal ITS sequences that remain unidentified at the phylum, class, and order levels, respectively. The search function (https://unite.ut.ee/top50.php) is implemented in the UNITE database for molecular identification of fungi, such that the underlying sequences and fungal lineages are open to third-party annotation. We invite researchers to examine these enigmatic fungal lineages in the hope that their taxonomic resolution will not have to wait another ten years or more.

[1]  G. Berg,et al.  The Hidden World within Plants: Ecological and Evolutionary Considerations for Defining Functioning of Microbial Endophytes , 2015, Microbiology and Molecular Reviews.

[2]  K. Hughes,et al.  Cloning of ribosomal ITS PCR products creates frequent, non-random chimeric sequences – a test involving heterozygotes between Gymnopus dichrous taxa I and II , 2015 .

[3]  P. Bork,et al.  Shotgun metagenomes and multiple primer pair-barcode combinations of amplicons reveal biases in metabarcoding analyses of fungi , 2015 .

[4]  Gianluigi Cardinali,et al.  International Society of Human and Animal Mycology (ISHAM)-ITS reference DNA barcoding database--the quality controlled standard tool for routine identification of human and animal pathogenic fungi. , 2015, Medical mycology.

[5]  R. Henrik Nilsson,et al.  A Comprehensive, Automatically Updated Fungal ITS Sequence Dataset for Reference-Based Chimera Control in Environmental Sequencing Efforts , 2015, Microbes and environments.

[6]  A. Jumpponen,et al.  Scraping the bottom of the barrel: are rare high throughput sequences artifacts? , 2015 .

[7]  R. Henrik Nilsson,et al.  Global diversity and geography of soil fungi , 2014, Science.

[8]  R. Henrik Nilsson,et al.  Finding needles in haystacks: linking scientific names, reference specimens and molecular data for Fungi , 2014, Database J. Biol. Databases Curation.

[9]  Jack W. McFarland,et al.  A first comprehensive census of fungi in soil reveals both hyperdiversity and fine-scale niche partitioning , 2014 .

[10]  Michael Weiss,et al.  Towards a unified paradigm for sequence‐based identification of fungi , 2013, Molecular ecology.

[11]  M. Pautasso.  CommentaryFungal under-representation is (indeed) diminishing in the life sciences , 2013 .

[12]  M. Pautasso.  Fungal under-representation is (indeed) diminishing in the life sciences , 2013 .

[13]  Rob Knight,et al.  Meeting Report: Fungal ITS Workshop (October 2012) , 2013, Standards in genomic sciences.

[14]  Kessy Abarenkov,et al.  Fungal community analysis by high-throughput sequencing of amplified markers – a user's guide , 2013, The New phytologist.

[15]  Erik Kristiansson,et al.  Incorporating molecular data in fungal systematics: a guide for aspiring researchers , 2013, 1302.3244.

[16]  R. Henrik Nilsson,et al.  Five simple guidelines for establishing basic authenticity and reliability of newly generated fungal ITS sequences. , 2012 .

[17]  John L. Spouge,et al.  Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for Fungi , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Guy Cochrane,et al.  The International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[19]  R. Henrik Nilsson,et al.  Tidying Up International Nucleotide Sequence Databases: Ecological, Geographical and Sequence Quality Annotation of ITS Sequences of Mycorrhizal Fungi , 2011, PloS one.

[20]  T. James,et al.  Archaeorhizomycetes: Unearthing an Ancient Class of Ubiquitous Soil Fungi , 2011, Science.

[21]  D. Bass,et al.  Discovery of novel intermediate forms redefines the fungal tree of life , 2011, Nature.

[22]  R. Henrik Nilsson,et al.  Progress in molecular and morphological taxon discovery in Fungi and options for formal classification of environmental sequences , 2011 .

[23]  M. Blackwell.  The fungi: 1, 2, 3 ... 5.1 million species? , 2011, American journal of botany.

[24]  G. Cochrane,et al.  The International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[25]  D. Geiser,et al.  The promise and pitfalls of sequence-based identification of plant-pathogenic fungi and oomycetes. , 2010, Phytopathology.

[26]  D. Moreira,et al.  The environmental clade LKM11 and Rozella form the deepest branching clade of fungi. , 2010, Protist.

[27]  Jason E. Stajich,et al.  The Fungi , 2009, Current Biology.

[28]  Erik Kristiansson,et al.  An outlook on the fungal internal transcribed spacer sequences in GenBank and the introduction of a web-based tool for the exploration of fungal diversity. , 2009, The New phytologist.

[29]  K. Hyde,et al.  Epitypification: should we epitypify? , 2008, Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B.

[30]  Christopher W. Schadt,et al.  Seasonal Dynamics of Previously Unknown Fungal Lineages in Tundra Soils , 2003, Science.