Fit Between Individuals, Tasks, Technology, and Environment (FITTE) Framework: A Proposed Extension of FITT to Evaluate and Optimise Health Information Technology Use

Evaluating and optimising 'fit' between technology and clinical work is critical to ensure the intended benefits of technology implementations are achieved. Using a mixed method approach (structured observation, interviews, field notes) we collected data regarding users, tasks, technology, and factors impeding technology use from a sample of 38 clinicians on two wards at an Australian hospital. We used the FITT framework to assess the relationships between users, tasks, and technology. Our findings showed that even when adequate fit between users, tasks, and technology was attained additional factors related to the environment (including the temporal rhythms of a ward, infection control rooms, or space limitations) ultimately affected technology use. Thus, we propose the fit between individuals, task, technology and environment (FITTE) framework as a means to evaluate and optimise technology use by explicating the relationships between users, tasks, technology, and the environment in which they operate.

[1]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions , 2005, Journal of health services research & policy.

[2]  Donna J. Burnie Electronic health records documentation in nursing : nurses' perceptions, attitudes and preferences , 2010 .

[3]  Johanna I Westbrook,et al.  All in a day's work: an observational study to quantify how and with whom doctors on hospital wards spend their time , 2008, The Medical journal of Australia.

[4]  Johanna I. Westbrook,et al.  Quantifying Health Professionals' Patterns of Work and Communication and the Impact of Health Information Technology: A Workshop on how to Design and Use the Work Observation Method by Activity Timing (WOMBAT) Tool , 2013, MedInfo.

[5]  Johanna I. Westbrook,et al.  Model Formulation: Contextual Implementation Model: A Framework for Assisting Clinical Information System Implementations , 2008, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[6]  E Ammenwerth,et al.  Improving Evaluation to Address the Unintended Consequences of Health Information Technology , 2016, Yearbook of Medical Informatics.

[7]  Dean F. Sittig,et al.  New Unintended Adverse Consequences of Electronic Health Records , 2016, Yearbook of Medical Informatics.

[8]  J. Westbrook,et al.  Mobile and Fixed Computer Use by Doctors and Nurses on Hospital Wards: Multi-method Study on the Relationships Between Clinician Role, Clinical Task, and Device Choice , 2009, Journal of medical Internet research.

[9]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..

[10]  Richard J. Holden,et al.  The Technology Acceptance Model: Its past and its future in health care , 2010, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[11]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs , 1999, Inf. Manag..

[12]  Ling Li,et al.  Impact of an electronic medication management system on hospital doctors’ and nurses’ work: a controlled pre–post, time and motion study , 2013, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[13]  이훈,et al.  지각된 유용성(Perceived Usefulness)의 영향분석 , 2004 .

[14]  Yunan Chen,et al.  Documenting transitional information in EMR , 2010, CHI.

[15]  Claude Sicotte,et al.  Assessing Task–Technology Fit in a PACS Upgrade: Do Users’ and Developers’ Appraisals Converge? , 2011, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[16]  Elske Ammenwerth,et al.  Bmc Medical Informatics and Decision Making It-adoption and the Interaction of Task, Technology and Individuals: a Fit Framework and a Case Study , 2022 .