Memory for Items and Associations: Distinct Representations and Processes in Associative Recognition.

In two experiments, participants studied word pairs and later discriminated old (intact) word pairs from foils, including recombined word pairs and pairs including one or two previously unstudied words. Rather than making old/new memory judgments, they chose one of five responses: (1) Old-Old (original), (2) Old-Old (rearranged), (3) Old-New, (4) New-Old, (5) New-New. To tease apart the effects of item familiarity from those of associative strength, we varied both how many times a specific word-pair was repeated (1 or 5) and how many different word pairs were associated with a given word (1 or 5). Participants could discriminate associative information from item information such that they recognized which word of a foil was new, or whether both were new, as well as discriminating recombined studied words from original pairings. The error and latency data support the view that item and associative information are stored as distinct memory representations and make separate contributions at retrieval.

[1]  G. Bower,et al.  Human Associative Memory , 1973 .

[2]  M. Humphreys,et al.  Relational information and the context effect in recognition memory , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[3]  B B Murdock,et al.  TODAM2: a model for the storage and retrieval of item, associative, and serial-order information. , 1993, Psychological review.

[4]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[5]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. , 1984, Psychological review.

[6]  J. Gardiner,et al.  Forgetting in recognition memory with and without recollective experience , 1991, Memory & cognition.

[7]  L. Reder Implicit memory and metacognition , 1996 .

[8]  William E. Hockley,et al.  Familiarity and recollection in item and associative recognition , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[9]  W. Donaldson,et al.  The role of decision processes in remembering and knowing , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[10]  M. Humphreys,et al.  Different Ways to Cue a Coherent Memory System: A Theory for Episodic, Semantic, and Procedural Tasks. , 1989 .

[11]  D. Schacter,et al.  Associative recognition in Alzheimer's disease: evidence for impaired recall-to-reject. , 2004, Neuropsychology.

[12]  E. Heit,et al.  Associative Recognition: a Case of Recall-to-reject Processing , 2022 .

[13]  J T Wixted,et al.  On the nature of associative information in recognition memory. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  Michael R. Healy,et al.  Effects of repetition and response deadline on associative recognition in young and older adults , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[15]  John R. Anderson,et al.  The fan effect: New results and new theories. , 1999 .

[16]  Larry L. Jacoby,et al.  Journal of Memory and Language , 2001 .

[17]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Models for recall and recognition. , 1992, Annual review of psychology.

[18]  B. Murdock Context and mediators in a theory of distributed associative memory (TODAM2). , 1997 .

[19]  Jing Xu,et al.  The influence of averaging and noisy decision strategies on the recognition memory ROC , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[20]  Karen R. Brandt,et al.  Measuring the speed of the conscious components of recognition memory: Remembering is faster than knowing , 2006, Consciousness and Cognition.

[21]  Lynne M. Reder,et al.  Models of recognition: A review of arguments in favor of a dual-process account , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[22]  J. Dunn Remember-know: a matter of confidence. , 2004, Psychological review.

[23]  William E. Hockley,et al.  Tests of the separate retrieval of item and associative information using a frequency-judgment task , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[24]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[25]  Lynne M Reder,et al.  Modeling Age-related Memory Deficits: a Two-parameter Solution the Pattern of Age-related Decline of Memory Function , 2022 .

[26]  Caren M. Rotello,et al.  Recall-to-Reject in Recognition: Evidence from ROC Curves ☆ ☆☆ , 2000 .

[27]  Clyde Young Kramer,et al.  Extension of multiple range tests to group means with unequal numbers of replications , 1956 .

[28]  E. Hirshman,et al.  Modeling the conscious correlates of recognition memory: Reflections on the remember-know paradigm , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[29]  William E. Hockley,et al.  Item versus associative information: Further comparisons of forgetting rates. , 1992 .

[30]  Jiquan Ngiam,et al.  Experience is a Double-Edged Sword: A Computational Model of The Encoding/Retrieval Trade-Off With Familiarity , 2007 .

[31]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Relating Theory and Data : Essays on Human Memory in Honor of Bennet B. Murdock , 1991 .

[32]  A. Yonelinas The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research , 2002 .

[33]  S. Gronlund,et al.  Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[34]  M. Humphreys Item and relational information: A case for context independent retrieval , 1978 .

[35]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Pairs do not suffer interference from other types of pairs or single items in associative recognition , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[36]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  A model for recognition memory: REM—retrieving effectively from memory , 1997, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[37]  F. Craik,et al.  The effects of aging and divided attention on memory for item and associative information. , 2003, Psychology and aging.

[38]  John R. Anderson Retrieval of propositional information from long-term memory , 1974 .

[39]  Kenneth J. Malmberg,et al.  Modeling the effects of repetitions, similarity, and normative word frequency on old-new recognition and judgments of frequency. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[40]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  MINERVA 2: A simulation model of human memory , 1984 .

[41]  G. Mandler Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. , 1980 .

[42]  M. Orne On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. , 1962 .

[43]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Recognition Memory for Item and Associative Information: A Comparison of Forgetting Rates , 1991 .

[44]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Time course of item and associative information: implications for global memory models. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[45]  Colleen M. Parks,et al.  Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) in recognition memory: a review. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[46]  C. Lebiere,et al.  The Atomic Components of Thought , 1998 .

[47]  L. Reder,et al.  A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: a computational model of remember-know judgments in a continuous recognition paradigm. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[48]  Degree of learning and retrieval speed: Study time and multiple exposures. , 1984 .

[49]  C. Phillips,et al.  Journal of Memory and Language , 2001 .

[50]  L L Jacoby,et al.  Isolating the contributions of familiarity and source information to item recognition: a time course analysis. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[51]  J A SWETS,et al.  Is there a sensory threshold? , 1961, Science.

[52]  J. Swets,et al.  A decision-making theory of visual detection. , 1954, Psychological review.

[53]  Michael Wilson,et al.  MRC psycholinguistic database: Machine-usable dictionary, version 2.00 , 1988 .

[54]  John R. Anderson,et al.  A partial resolution of the paradox of interference: The role of integrating knowledge , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[55]  C. Dunnett A Multiple Comparison Procedure for Comparing Several Treatments with a Control , 1955 .

[56]  M. Verde,et al.  Associative interference in recognition memory: A dual-process account , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[57]  Kevin Murnane,et al.  List composition and the word-frequency effect for recognition memory. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[58]  Philip J. Stroffolino,et al.  To calculate or not to calculate: A source activation confusion model of problem familiarity's role in strategy selection , 1997 .

[59]  Lynne M. Reder,et al.  Differential fan effect and attentional focus , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[60]  K. Malmberg,et al.  Modeling the effects of verbal and nonverbal pair strength on associative recognition , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[61]  Tim Curran,et al.  Retrieval dynamics of recognition and frequency judgments: Evidence for separate processes of familiarity and recall. , 1994 .

[62]  A. Yonelinas Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: The contribution of recollection and familiarity , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[63]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. , 1988 .

[64]  L. Reder,et al.  Metacognition does not imply awareness: Strategy choice is governed by implicit learning and memory , 1996 .

[65]  D. Gallo Using recall to reduce false recognition: diagnostic and disqualifying monitoring. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[66]  J. Wixted Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. , 2007, Psychological review.