Impact of license choice on Open Source Software development activity

The Open Source Software (OSS) development model has emerged as an important competing paradigm to proprietary alternatives; however, insufficient research exists to understand the influence of some OSS project characteristics on the level of activity of the development process. A basic such characteristic is the selection of the project's software license. Drawing upon social movement theory, our study examined the relationship between OSS licenses and project activity. Some OSS licenses include a “copyleft” clause, which requires that if derivative products are to be released, it must be done under the license the original product had. We hypothesize that copylefted licenses, as opposed to noncopylefted licenses, are associated with higher developer membership and coding activity, faster development speed, and longer developer permanence in the project. To test the hypotheses, we used archival data sources of working OSS projects spanning several years of development time. We discuss practical and theoretical implications of the results as well as future research ideas. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  P. Mahalanobis On the generalized distance in statistics , 1936 .

[2]  M. Olson,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action , 1965 .

[3]  P. J. Huber The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions , 1967 .

[4]  Howard B. Lee,et al.  A first course in factor analysis , 1973 .

[5]  H. Kaiser An index of factorial simplicity , 1974 .

[6]  Fred P. Brooks,et al.  The Mythical Man-Month , 1975, Reliable Software.

[7]  Kenneth J. White,et al.  THE DURBIN-WATSON TEST FOR SERIAL CORRELATION WITH EXTREME SAMPLE SIZES OR MANY REGRESSORS' , 1977 .

[8]  Peter E. Kennedy A Guide to Econometrics , 1979 .

[9]  H. Tajfel Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology , 1981 .

[10]  H. White Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Misspecified Models , 1982 .

[11]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[12]  Bert Klandermans,et al.  MOBILIZATION AND PARTICIPATION: SOCIAL-PSYCHOLOGICAL EXPANSIONS OF RESOURCE MOBILIZATION THEORY* , 1984 .

[13]  Barry W. Boehm,et al.  Software Engineering Economics , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[14]  M. Goldstein,et al.  Multivariate Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1984 .

[15]  Steven Levy,et al.  Hackers: Heroes of the Computer Revolution , 1984 .

[16]  I. Nonaka,et al.  Managing the new product development process , 1985 .

[17]  Capers Jones,et al.  Programming Productivity , 1986 .

[18]  W. Velicer,et al.  Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. , 1988, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  Alberto Melucci,et al.  Nomads of the Present: Social Movements and Individual Needs in Contemporary Society , 1989 .

[20]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[21]  Vijay Sethi,et al.  Construct Measurement in Information Systems Research: An Illustration in Strategic Systems , 1991 .

[22]  Sallie M. Henry,et al.  An Empirical Study of the Object-Oriented Paradigm and Software Reuse , 1991, OOPSLA.

[23]  S. Green How Many Subjects Does It Take To Do A Regression Analysis. , 1991, Multivariate behavioral research.

[24]  William A. Gamson,et al.  Commitment and agency in social movements , 1991 .

[25]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Demography and Design: Predictors of New Product Team Performance , 1992 .

[26]  Marco Iansiti,et al.  Real-world R&D: jumping the product generation gap , 1999 .

[27]  David Lorge Parnas,et al.  Software aging , 1994, Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Software Engineering.

[28]  Frederick P. Brooks,et al.  The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Softw , 1978 .

[29]  Walt Scacchi,et al.  UNDERSTANDING SOFTWARE PRODUCTIVITY , 1995 .

[30]  M. Snyder,et al.  Sustained helping without obligation: motivation, longevity of service, and perceived attitude change among AIDS volunteers. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  Bertjan Doosje,et al.  Sticking Together or Falling Apart: In-Group Identification as a Psychological Determinant of Group Commitment Versus Individual Mobility , 1997 .

[32]  Jacquelien van Stekelenburg,et al.  The social psychology of protest , 1997 .

[33]  B. Simon,et al.  Collective identification and social movement participation. , 1998 .

[34]  Meir M. Lehman,et al.  Software's future: managing evolution , 1998, IEEE Software.

[35]  Eric S. Raymond Linux and Open - Source Success , 1999, IEEE Software.

[36]  Roy T. Fielding,et al.  Shared leadership in the Apache project , 1999, CACM.

[37]  Eric S. Raymond,et al.  The cathedral and the bazaar - musings on Linux and Open Source by an accidental revolutionary , 2001 .

[38]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Network Structure in Virtual Organizations , 1999 .

[39]  R. W. Lucky,et al.  Free software [Reflections] , 1999 .

[40]  Josh Lerner,et al.  The Simple Economics of Open Source , 2000 .

[41]  Peter C. Wayner Free for All: How Linux and the Free Software Movement Undercut the High-Tech Titans , 2000 .

[42]  P. Hom,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Antecedents and Correlates of Employee Turnover: Update, Moderator Tests, and Research Implications for the Next Millennium , 2000 .

[43]  Jan Ljungberg,et al.  Open source movements as a model for organising , 2000, ECIS.

[44]  R. Werle,et al.  De-Commodifying Software? Open Source Software Between Business Strategy and Social Movement , 2001 .

[45]  M. Castells,et al.  The Hacker Ethic and the Spirit of the Information Age , 2001 .

[46]  E. Hippel Innovation by User Communities: Learning From Open-Source Software , 2001 .

[47]  Richard M. Stallman,et al.  Free Software, Free Society: Selected Essays of Richard M. Stallman , 2009 .

[48]  Sandeep Krishnamurthy,et al.  Cave or Community? An Empirical Examination of 100 Mature Open Source Projects , 2002, First Monday.

[49]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Open source software projects as virtual organisations: competency rallying for software development , 2002, IEE Proc. Softw..

[50]  J. Herbsleb,et al.  Two case studies of open source software development: Apache and Mozilla , 2002, TSEM.

[51]  M. Fink,et al.  The Business and Economics of Linux and Open Source , 2002 .

[52]  Stefan Koch,et al.  Effort, co‐operation and co‐ordination in an open source software project: GNOME , 2002, Inf. Syst. J..

[53]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Why Hackers Do What They Do: Understanding Motivation and Effort in Free/Open Source Software Projects , 2003 .

[54]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Investigating Determinants of Software Developers' Intentions to Follow Methodologies , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[55]  Jane Greenberg,et al.  Open Source Software Development and Lotka's Law: Bibliometric Patterns in Programming , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[56]  Mikko Mustonen,et al.  Copyleft - the economics of Linux and other open source software , 2003, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[57]  Robert E. Cole,et al.  From a Firm-Based to a Community-Based Model of Knowledge Creation: The Case of the Linux Kernel Development , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[58]  Hesan A. Quazi,et al.  Finders, keepers? Attracting, motivating and retaining knowledge workers , 2003 .

[59]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Profiting from Voluntary Information Spillovers: How Users Benefit by Freely Revealing Their Innovations , 2003 .

[60]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Open Source Software and the "Private-Collective" Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[61]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Motivation of software developers in Open Source projects: an Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel , 2003 .

[62]  H. Tajfel,et al.  The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. , 2004 .

[63]  Kevin C. Desouza,et al.  Open knowledge management: Lessons from the open source revolution , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[64]  Andrew M. St. Laurent Understanding Open Source and Free Software Licensing , 2004 .

[65]  Giancarlo Succi,et al.  An empirical study of open-source and closed-source software products , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[66]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software , 2005 .

[67]  Yulin Fang,et al.  Individual, social and situational determinants of telecommuter productivity , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[68]  Katherine J. Stewart,et al.  The Impact of Ideology on Effectiveness in Open Source Software Development Teams , 2006, MIS Q..

[69]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  The Architecture of Participation: Does Code Architecture Mitigate Free Riding in the Open Source Development Model? , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[70]  Likoebe M. Maruping,et al.  Impacts of License Choice and Organizational Sponsorship on User Interest and Development Activity in Open Source Software Projects , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[71]  Sonali K. Shah Motivation, Governance, and the Viability of Hybrid Forms in Open Source Software Development , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[72]  Frederico T. Fonseca,et al.  Information Policies and Open Source Software in Developing Countries , 2007 .

[73]  Ravi Sen,et al.  A Strategic Analysis of Competition Between Open Source and Proprietary Software , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[74]  Yulin Fang,et al.  Understanding Sustained Participation in Open Source Software Projects , 2009, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..