A neuro-fuzzy system for X-ray spectra interpretation

A decision scheme for the interpretation of spectra from wavelength dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry is described that encompasses elements from three areas of artificial intelligence: fuzzy logic, rule based expert systems and neural net technology.After transforming the recorded spectra to line spectra by appropriate background correction a reasoning scheme is applied that takes into account not only the observed spectra, but also the recording conditions and prior spectroscopic information regarding the relative emission probabilities and the usefulness of the different lines for the purpose of element identification. The latter is done on the basis of a previously described scheme to compute conditional a posteriori Bayes probabilities for a “mean matrix”. These different pieces of information are then assembled into a battery of fuzzy rules. The importance of the rules as well as the importance of the X-ray lines is determined in a training process, similar to the one in a feedforward back-propagation network.To further stabilize the results this network is pruned in a second training cycle. This, however, had little effect on the quality of interpretation.The advantages of this approach to the interpretation of X-ray spectra over older ones are numerous: the system adapts itself to better interpret spectra that are of greater importance to a laboratory as these are better represented in the training set; the fuzzy logic is capable of working with incomplete and uncertain knowledge, and the neural network results based on these fuzzy rules is readily interpretable by the X-ray spectroscopist as every rule can be expressed also in natural language as in any classical rule based system.

[1]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[2]  K. Janssens,et al.  Increased Accuracy in the Automated Interpretation of Large EPMA Data Sets by the Use of an Expert System , 1988, Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards.

[3]  F. R. Paolini,et al.  An Interactive Program for the X-ray Specrometer , for Data Collection and Data Manipulation - Use in Qualitative Analysis , 1976 .

[4]  J J Hopfield,et al.  Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Koen Janssens,et al.  Implementation of an expert system for the qualitative interpretation of X-ray fluorescence spectra , 1986 .

[6]  T. Pavlidis,et al.  Fuzzy sets and their applications to cognitive and decision processes , 1977 .

[7]  Raymond P. Goehner,et al.  Computer-Aided Qualitative X-Ray Powder Diffraction Phase Analysis , 1982 .

[8]  P. Wobrauschek,et al.  Trends, applications and results in X-ray fluorescence analysis , 1993 .

[9]  Hans Henrik Thodberg,et al.  Improving Generalization of Neural Networks Through Pruning , 1991, Int. J. Neural Syst..

[10]  Günther Tölg,et al.  The role of total-reflection X-ray fluorescence in atomic spectroscopy , 1993 .

[11]  Koen Janssens,et al.  Evaluation of energy-dispersive x-ray spectra with the aid of expert systems , 1986 .

[12]  T. C. Huang,et al.  A Rapid and Precise Computer Method for Qualitative X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis , 1980 .