An in vivo Biocompatibility Assessment of MEMS Materials for Spinal Fusion Monitoring

The site-specific biocompatibility of silicon chips and commercially available silicon pressure sensor die were evaluated after implantation in caprine (goat) spine. Surgical procedures were developed to insert silicon chips into the nucleus pulposus regions of the lumbar discs and pressure sensors into autologous bone grafts for cervical spine fusion. After a six-month implantation period, the animal was sacrificed and the spinal segments were meticulously harvested and analyzed for local tissue response via gross examination and histological techniques. Gross examination of cervical and lumbar spinal segments after harvest and dissection did not reveal any visible signs of adverse reactions to the MEMS materials. Furthermore, the surrounding tissues and musculature for both spinal regions were devoid of necrosis. Histological analysis of compromised spinal segments did not reveal evidence of any adverse foreign body response by the caprine spinal tissue to the implanted MEMS materials. These preliminary results support the further development of a spinal fusion monitoring system based on implantable MEMS sensors.

[1]  A Rohlmann,et al.  Internal spinal fixator stiffness has only a minor influence on stresses in the adjacent discs. , 1999, Spine.

[2]  Antonius Rohlmann,et al.  Telemeterized Load Measurement Using Instrumented spinal Internal Fixators in a Patient With Degenerative Instability , 1995, Spine.

[3]  G. Bergmann,et al.  In vitro load measurement using an instrumented spinal fixation device. , 1996, Medical engineering & physics.

[4]  A Rohlmann,et al.  Comparison of loads on internal spinal fixation devices measured in vitro and in vivo. , 1997, Medical engineering & physics.

[5]  A. Fleischman,et al.  Microelectromechanical Systems and Neurosurgery: A New Era in a New Millennium , 2001, Neurosurgery.

[6]  T. Smit The use of a quadruped as an in vivo model for the study of the spine – biomechanical considerations , 2002, European Spine Journal.

[7]  A Rohlmann,et al.  Influence of load carrying on loads in internal spinal fixators. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  J. Monsivais,et al.  The anatomy of the vertebral column of the Nubian goat: a peculiarity of the arcus vertebrae C5, C6 and C7 forming large spatia interarcualia. , 1994, Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire.

[9]  Antonius Rohlmann,et al.  Loads on an internal spinal fixation device during physical therapy. , 2002, Physical therapy.

[10]  E. Benzel,et al.  Cervical interbody fusion. , 2001, Journal of neurosurgery.

[11]  John A Szivek,et al.  An Implantable Strain Measurement System Designed to Detect Spine Fusion: Preliminary Results From a Biomechanical In Vivo Study , 2002, Spine.

[12]  Peter S. Donzelli,et al.  Real-Time In Vivo Loading in the Lumbar Spine: Part 1. Interbody Implant: Load Cell Design and Preliminary Results , 2000, Spine.

[13]  A Rohlmann,et al.  Monitoring In Vivo Implant Loads With a Telemeterized Internal Spinal Fixation Device , 2000, Spine.

[14]  M. Markel,et al.  Cervical Interbody Fusion Cages: An Animal Model With and Without Bone Morphogenetic Protein , 1998, Spine.

[15]  K. Gill,et al.  Can lumbar spine radiographs accurately determine fusion in postoperative patients? Correlation of routine radiographs with a second surgical look at lumbar fusions. , 1993, Spine.