Economic values of growth and feed efficiency for fish farming in recirculating aquaculture system with density and nitrogen output limitations: a case study with African catfish (Clarias gariepinus).

In fish farming, economic values (EV) of breeding goal traits are lacking, even though they are key parameters when defining selection objectives. The aim of this study was to develop a bioeconomic model to estimate EV of 2 traits representing production performances in fish farming: the thermal growth coefficient (TGC) and the feed conversion ratio (FCR). This approach was applied to a farm producing African catfish (Clarias gariepinus) in a recirculating aquaculture system (RAS). In the RAS, 2 factors could limit production level: the nitrogen treatment capacity of the biofilter or the fish density in rearing tanks at harvest. Profit calculation includes revenue from fish sales, cost of juveniles, cost of feed, cost of waste water treatment, and fixed costs. In the reference scenario, profit was modeled to zero. EV were calculated as the difference in profit per kilogram of fish between the current population mean for both traits (µt) and the next generation of selective breeding (µt+Δt) for either TGC or FCR. EV of TGC and FCR were calculated for three generations of hypothetical selection on either TGC or FCR (respectively 6.8% and 7.6% improvement per generation). The results show that changes in TGC and FCR can affect both the number of fish that can be stocked (number of batches per year and number of fish per batch) and the factor limiting production. The EV of TGC and FCR vary and depend on the limiting factors. When dissolved NH3-N is the limiting factor for both µt and µt+Δt, increasing TGC decreases the number of fish that can be stocked but increases the number of batches that can be grown. As a result, profit remains constant and EVTGC is zero. Increasing FCR, however, increases the number of fish stocked and the ratio of fish produced per kilogram of feed consumed ("economic efficiency"). The EVFCR is 0.14 €/kg of fish, and profit per kilogram of fish increases by about 10%. When density is the limiting factor for both µt and µt+Δt, the number of fish stocked per batch is fixed; therefore, extra profit is obtained by increasing either TGC, which increases the annual number of batches, or by decreasing FCR, which decreases annual feed consumption. EVTGC is 0.03 €/kg of fish and EVFCR is 0.05-0.06 €/kg of fish. These results emphasize the importance of calculating economic values in the right context to develop efficient future breeding programs in aquaculture.

[1]  M. Salhi,et al.  Growth, feed utilization and body composition of black catfish, Rhamdia quelen, fry fed diets containing different protein and energy levels , 2004 .

[2]  D. Bureau,et al.  Evidence of three growth stanzas in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) across life stages and adaptation of the thermal-unit growth coefficient , 2007 .

[3]  E. W. Brascamp,et al.  Genetics of performance traits. , 1998 .

[4]  S. Helland,et al.  Feed intake, growth and feed utilization of offspring from wild and selected Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) , 1999 .

[5]  Khalaf,et al.  Balance trials with African catfish Clarias gariepinus fed phytase‐treated soybean meal‐based diets , 1999 .

[6]  D. Houlihan,et al.  Feed efficiency of rainbow trout can be improved through selection: different genetic potential on alternative diets. , 2006, Journal of animal science.

[7]  G. Fox,et al.  Economic weights from profit equations: appraising their accuracy in the long run , 1994 .

[8]  S. Kaushik,et al.  Nutritional energetics in fish: energy and protein utilization in rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri). , 1990, World review of nutrition and dietetics.

[9]  L. N. Hazel The Genetic Basis for Constructing Selection Indexes. , 1943, Genetics.

[10]  J. Gibson Selection on the Major Components of Milk: Alternative Methods of Deriving Economic Weights , 1989 .

[11]  P. Sørensen,et al.  Poultry breeding and genetics , 1990 .

[12]  J. Rijn Waste treatment in recirculating aquaculture systems , 2013 .

[13]  J. Silverstein,et al.  Strain differences in feed efficiency measured as residual feed intake in individually reared rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum) , 2005 .

[14]  F. Médale,et al.  Selection for growth in brown trout increases feed intake capacity without affecting maintenance and growth requirements. , 2004, Journal of animal science.

[15]  A. J. Barfoot,et al.  Defining desired genetic gains for rainbow trout breeding objective using analytic hierarchy process. , 2012, Journal of animal science.

[16]  Morten Rye,et al.  The importance of selective breeding in aquaculture to meet future demands for animal protein: A review , 2012 .

[17]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[18]  J. Barker,et al.  Future Developments in the Genetic Improvement of Animals , 1983 .

[19]  T. Storebakken,et al.  Genetic variation in feed intake, growth and feed utilization in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) , 2001 .

[20]  Jack C. M. Dekkers,et al.  Estimation of economic values for dairy cattle breeding goals: Bias due to sub-optimal management policies , 1991 .

[21]  A. Groen Economic values in cattle breeding. II. Influences of production circumstances in situations with output limitations. , 1989 .

[22]  N. H. Nguyen,et al.  Investment appraisal of genetic improvement programs in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) , 2007 .

[23]  A. Groen Derivation of economic values in cattle breeding: a model at farm level. , 1988 .

[24]  V. Ducrocq,et al.  Rainbow trout resistance to bacterial cold-water disease is moderately heritable and is not adversely correlated with growth. , 2009, Journal of animal science.

[25]  L. Labbé,et al.  Selection for growth of brown trout (Salmo trutta) affects feed intake but not feed efficiency , 2001 .

[26]  M. Verdegem,et al.  New developments in recirculating aquaculture systems in Europe: A perspective on environmental sustainability , 2010 .