Green concrete or red herring? – future of alkali-activated materials

Abstract Alkali-activated binders, including geopolymers, are widely considered to provide a pathway to the largescale production of ‘green concretes’, with commercialisation proceeding internationally, and scientific understanding developing at a rapid pace. In assessing any claims regarding the environmental performance of alkali-activated concretes, analysis of appropriate formulation and processing conditions as a function of geographic and raw materials supply parameters must be undertaken. Prediction of durability is also essential, and there remains much to be done in validation of durability test methods for these materials. Another key challenge in the use of any novel binder is compliance with regulatory standards. Updated standards in some jurisdictions show increasing acceptance of alkali activation technology in principle and in practice, showing that the need for sustainable binders can drive regulatory developments in this area and thus enable the uptake and utilisation of these materials. The advancement of scientific knowledge has proven essential in this process.

[1]  Priyan Mendis,et al.  Engineering properties of inorganic polymer concretes (IPCs) , 2007 .

[2]  Nicholas J. Carino,et al.  Report on Performance-Based Requirements for Concrete , 2010 .

[3]  Ángel Palomo,et al.  Alkali-activated fly ash: Effect of thermal curing conditions on mechanical and microstructural development – Part II , 2007 .

[4]  H. Hilsdorf,et al.  Performance Criteria for concrete Durability , 1995 .

[5]  John L. Provis,et al.  Chemical Research and Climate Change as Drivers in the Commercial Adoption of Alkali Activated Materials , 2010 .

[6]  N. Roussel,et al.  An environmental evaluation of geopolymer based concrete production: reviewing current research trends , 2011 .

[7]  Priyan Mendis,et al.  Design of high-strength concrete members: state-of-the-art , 2003 .

[8]  John L. Provis,et al.  Engineering and durability properties of concretes based on alkali-activated granulated blast furnac , 2012 .

[9]  John L. Provis,et al.  Alkali activated materials : state-of-the-art report, RILEM TC 224-AAM , 2014 .

[10]  Paul D Krauss,et al.  Guidelines for Concrete Mixtures Containing Supplementary Cementitious Materials to Enhance Durability of Bridge Decks , 2007 .

[11]  J. Provis.  Alkali-activated Binders and Concretes: The Path to Standardization , 2013 .

[12]  John L. Provis,et al.  Accelerated carbonation testing of alkali-activated binders significantly underestimates service lif , 2012 .

[13]  Erez N. Allouche,et al.  Impact of Alkali Silica Reaction on Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete , 2013 .

[14]  J. Ideker,et al.  Advances in alternative cementitious binders , 2011 .

[15]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[16]  G. Corder,et al.  Costs and carbon emissions for geopolymer pastes in comparison to ordinary portland cement , 2011 .

[17]  Matthias Fawer,et al.  Life cycle inventories for the production of sodium silicates , 1999 .

[18]  Karlson Hargroves,et al.  Factor Five: Transforming the Global Economy through 80% Improvements in Resource Productivity , 2009 .

[19]  J. Deventer,et al.  The Role of Inorganic Polymer Technology in the Development of ‘Green Concrete’ , 2007 .

[20]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[21]  W. Marsden.  I and J , 2012 .

[22]  Erez N. Allouche,et al.  Mechanical Properties of Fly-Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete , 2011 .

[23]  Ravindra K. Dhir,et al.  Performance related approach to use of recycled aggregates. WRAP Final Report , 2007 .

[24]  Julian M. Allwood,et al.  Sustainable Materials - With Both Eyes Open , 2012 .

[25]  J. Kropp,et al.  Performance criteria for concrete durability : state of the art report prepared by RILEM Technical Committee TC 116-PCD, Performance of Concrete as a Criterion of its Durability , 1995 .

[26]  C. Shi,et al.  Alkali-Activated Cements and Concretes , 2003 .

[27]  Anja Buchwald,et al.  Life-cycle analysis of geopolymers , 2009 .

[28]  John L. Provis,et al.  Technical and commercial progress in the adoption of geopolymer cement , 2012 .

[29]  P. L. Pratt,et al.  Factors affecting the strength of alkali-activated slag , 1994 .

[30]  Detlef Heinz,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Geopolymer Concrete – What is the Environmental Benefit , 2009 .

[31]  N. B. Milestone,et al.  Reactions in cement encapsulated nuclear wastes: need for toolbox of different cement types , 2006 .

[32]  I. Odler.  Special Inorganic Cements , 2000 .

[33]  X. Querol,et al.  The role of open and closed curing conditions on the leaching properties of fly ash-slag-based geopolymers. , 2010, Journal of hazardous materials.