The “Ticktock” of Our Internal Clock

The phenomenon commonly known as subjective accenting refers to the fact that identical sound events within purely isochronous sequences are perceived as unequal. Although subjective accenting has been extensively explored using behavioral methods, no physiological evidence has ever been provided for it. In the present study, we tested the notion that these perceived irregularities are related to the dynamic deployment of attention. We disrupted listeners' expectancies in different positions of auditory equitone sequences and measured their responses through brain event-related potentials (ERPs). Significant differences in a late parietal (P3-like) ERP component were found between the responses elicited on odd-numbered versus even-numbered positions, suggesting that a default binary metric structure was perceived. Our findings indicate that this phenomenon has a rather cognitive, attention-dependent origin, partly affected by musical expertise.

[1]  Dharmesh Patel.  Rhythm , 1919, The Craft of Poetry.

[2]  Curt Sachs.  Rhythm and tempo , 1953 .

[3]  N. Temperley,et al.  Personal tempo and subjective accentuation. , 1963, The Journal of general psychology.

[4]  Erratum , 1980, Brain Research.

[5]  D. Povel,et al.  Accents in equitone sequences , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  Drew H. Abney,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance Influence of Musical Groove on Postural Sway , 2015 .

[7]  J. Thomassen.  Melodic accent: Experiments and a tentative model , 1982 .

[8]  P. Fraisse.  6 – Rhythm and Tempo , 1982 .

[9]  M R Jones,et al.  Controlled attending as a function of melodic and temporal context , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  Erratum: "melodic accent: experiments and a tentative model" [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 71, 1596-1605 (1982)]. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Peter Essens,et al.  Perception of Temporal Patterns , 1985 .

[12]  Roger A. Kendall,et al.  The effect of melodic and temporal contour on recognition memory for pitch change , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  E. Donchin,et al.  Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[14]  M. R. Jones,et al.  Dynamic attending and responses to time. , 1989, Psychological review.

[15]  L L Cuddy,et al.  Effects of metric and harmonic rhythm on the detection of pitch alterations in melodic sequences. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  R. Näätänen.  The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[17]  Joseph P. Walton,et al.  Effects of Musical Training and Absolute Pitch on the Neural Processing of Melodic Intervals: A P3 Event-Related Potential Study , 1992 .

[18]  C. Drake,et al.  Reproduction of musical rhythms by children, adult musicians, and adult nonmusicians , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  R. Parncutt.  A Perceptual Model of Pulse Salience and Metrical Accent in Musical Rhythms , 1994 .

[20]  P. Essens,et al.  Structuring temporal sequences: Comparison of models and factors of complexity , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  M. Tervaniemi,et al.  Time course of loudness in tone patterns is automatically represented by the human brain , 1995, Neuroscience Letters.

[22]  Petr Janata,et al.  ERP Measures Assay the Degree of Expectancy Violation of Harmonic Contexts in Music , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  M. Besson,et al.  AN EVENT-RELATED POTENTIAL (ERP) STUDY OF MUSICAL EXPECTANCY : COMPARISON OF MUSICIANS WITH NONMUSICIANS , 1995 .

[24]  I. Winkler,et al.  Presentation rate and magnitude of stimulus deviance effects on human pre-attentive change detection , 1995, Neuroscience Letters.

[25]  E. Schröger,et al.  The influence of stimulus intensity and inter-stimulus interval on the detection of pitch and loudness changes. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[26]  E Pöppel,et al.  Temporal constraints in processing of nonverbal rhythmic patterns. , 1996, Acta neurobiologiae experimentalis.

[27]  E Schröger,et al.  The influence of stimulus intensity and inter-stimulus interval on the detection of pitch and loudness changes , 1996 .

[28]  Temporal integration in a subjective accentuation task as a function of child cognitive development , 1998, Neuroscience Letters.

[29]  W. Ritter,et al.  Attention affects the organization of auditory input associated with the mismatch negativity system , 1998, Brain Research.

[30]  T. Mondor,et al.  Mechanisms of perceptual organization and auditory selective attention: the role of pattern structure. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  Laurel J. Trainor,et al.  A Comparison of Contour and Interval Processing in Musicians and Nonmusicians Using Event‐Related Potentials , 1999 .

[32]  E. Large,et al.  The dynamics of attending: How people track time-varying events. , 1999 .

[33]  C. Drake,et al.  Tapping in Time with Mechanically and Expressively Performed Music , 2000 .

[34]  C. Drake,et al.  The development of rhythmic attending in auditory sequences: attunement, referent period, focal attending , 2000, Cognition.

[35]  T Allison,et al.  Contextual guidance of attention: human intracranial event-related potential evidence for feedback modulation in anatomically early temporally late stages of visual processing. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[36]  Edward W. Large,et al.  Perceiving temporal regularity in music , 2002, Cogn. Sci..