Intelligent Municipal Heritage Management Service in a Smart City: Telecommunication Traffic Characterization and Quality of Service

The monitoring of cultural heritage is becoming common in cities to provide heritage preservation and prevent vandalism. Using sensors and video cameras for this task implies the need to transmit information. In this paper, the teletraffic that cameras and sensors generate is characterized and the transmissions’ influence on the municipal communications network is evaluated. Then, we propose models for telecommunication traffic sources in an intelligent municipal heritage management service inside a smart sustainable city. The sources were simulated in a smart city scenario to find the proper quality of service (QoS) parameters for the communication network, using Valencia City as background. Specific sensors for intelligent municipal heritage management were selected and four telecommunication traffic sources were modelled according to real-life requirements and sensors datasheet. Different simulations were performed to find the proper CIR (Committed Information Rate) and PIR (Peak Information Rate) values and to study the effects of limited bandwidth networks. Packet loss, throughput, delay, and jitter were used to evaluate the network’s performance. Consequently, the result was the selection of the minimum values for PIR and CIR that ensured QoS and thus optimized the traffic telecommunication costs associated with an intelligent municipal heritage management service.

[1]  Awais Ahmad,et al.  Urban planning and building smart cities based on the Internet of Things using Big Data analytics , 2016, Comput. Networks.

[2]  José Emilio Meroño de Larriva,et al.  Monitoring Heritage Buildings with Open Source Hardware Sensors: A Case Study of the Mosque-Cathedral of Córdoba , 2016, Sensors.

[3]  Seungmin Rho,et al.  QoE-Enabled Big Video Streaming for Large-Scale Heterogeneous Clients and Networks in Smart Cities , 2016, IEEE Access.

[4]  Yiqiang Chen,et al.  Cooperative mobile video transmission for traffic surveillance in smart cities , 2016, Comput. Electr. Eng..

[5]  Houbing Song,et al.  Internet of Things and Big Data Analytics for Smart and Connected Communities , 2016, IEEE Access.

[6]  Marco Aurélio Gerosa,et al.  Software Platforms for Smart Cities , 2016, ACM Comput. Surv..

[7]  Mauro Iacono,et al.  An IoT‐based monitoring approach for cultural heritage sites: The Matera case , 2017, Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp..

[8]  Angel Gomez-Sacristan,et al.  Virtual Laboratory for QoS Study in Next-Generation Networks With Metro Ethernet Access , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[9]  Fernando-Juan García-Diego,et al.  Design of a Hybrid (Wired/Wireless) Acquisition Data System for Monitoring of Cultural Heritage Physical Parameters in Smart Cities , 2015, Sensors.

[10]  Georgios Mylonas,et al.  Empowering Citizens Toward the Co-Creation of Sustainable Cities , 2018, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[11]  U. Berardi,et al.  Smart Cities: Definitions, Dimensions, Performance, and Initiatives , 2015 .

[12]  M. A. Rodriguez-Hernandez,et al.  Evaluation of Quality of Service in Smart-Hospital Communications , 2015 .

[14]  Sameh Rabie,et al.  A Differentiated Service Two-Rate, Three-Color Marker with Efficient Handling of in-Profile Traffic , 2005, RFC.

[15]  Rossitza Goleva,et al.  3G network traffic sources measurement and analysis , 2014, Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol..

[16]  Pablo Sotres,et al.  Practical Lessons From the Deployment and Management of a Smart City Internet-of-Things Infrastructure: The SmartSantander Testbed Case , 2017, IEEE Access.

[17]  Andrea Zanella,et al.  Internet of Things for Smart Cities , 2014, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.