The GUM revision: the Bayesian view toward the expression of measurement uncertainty

The 'Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement' (GUM) has been in use for more than 20 years, serving its purposes worldwide at all levels of metrology, from scientific to industrial and commercial applications. However, the GUM presents some inconsistencies, both internally and with respect to its two later Supplements. For this reason, the Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, which is responsible for these documents, has decided that a major revision of the GUM is needed. This will be done by following the principles of Bayesian statistics, a concise summary of which is presented in this article. Those principles should be useful in physics and engineering laboratory courses that teach the fundamentals of data analysis and measurement uncertainty evaluation.

[1]  Wolfgang Woeger,et al.  Probability assignment to systematic deviations by the Principle of Maximum Entropy , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[2]  Ignacio Lira,et al.  Bayesian assessment of uncertainty in metrology: a tutorial , 2010 .

[3]  Dimitris Psillos,et al.  Teaching Measurement in the Introductory Physics Laboratory , 2003 .

[4]  Duane L. Deardorff,et al.  Introductory physics students' treatment of measurement uncertainty , 2001 .

[5]  G A Kyriazis.  Contributions to the revision of the 'Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement' , 2015 .

[6]  David Scot Abbott.  Assessing Student Understanding of Measurement and Uncertainty , 2003 .

[7]  K. Zachariadou,et al.  A laboratory over the internet for a course on data analysis , 2014 .

[8]  B. D. Hall,et al.  Does "Welch-Satterthwaite" make a good uncertainty estimate? , 2001 .

[9]  René Dybkaer,et al.  Revision of the ‘Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement’. Why and how , 2012 .

[10]  Ignacio Lira,et al.  Evaluating the Measurement Uncertainty , 2002 .

[11]  Clemens Elster,et al.  Bayesian uncertainty analysis compared with the application of the GUM and its supplements , 2014 .

[12]  E. Jaynes.  Information Theory and Statistical Mechanics , 1957 .

[13]  Saalih Allie,et al.  The development of first year physics students' ideas about measurement in terms of point and set paradigms , 2001 .

[14]  W. Bich.  Revision of the ?Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement?. Why and how , 2014 .

[15]  Tom Gardiner,et al.  Reference Quality Upper-Air Measurements: guidance for developing GRUAN data products , 2010 .

[16]  Bernard King.  Measurement uncertainty in sports drug testing , 2004 .

[17]  R. Cousins.  Why isn’t every physicist a Bayesian? , 1995 .

[18]  Ifan G. Hughes,et al.  Measurements and their Uncertainties: A practical guide to modern error analysis , 2010 .

[19]  Ida Kukliansky,et al.  Evaluating a Contextual-Based Course on Data Analysis for the Physics Laboratory , 2014 .

[20]  G. Lippi.  A priori analysis: an application to the estimate of the uncertainty in course grades , 2014, 1403.0419.

[21]  Rebecca Lippmann Kung.  Teaching the concepts of measurement: An example of a concept-based laboratory course , 2005 .

[22]  I Lira,et al.  The generalized maximum entropy trapezoidal probability density function , 2008 .

[23]  K. Gregory,et al.  A standard approach to measurement uncertainties for scientists and engineers in medicine , 2005, Australasian Physics & Engineering Sciences in Medicine.

[24]  Peter D. Lax,et al.  Change of Variables in Multiple Integrals II , 1999, Am. Math. Mon..

[25]  Les Kirkup,et al.  A guide to GUM , 2002 .

[26]  Ignacio Lira,et al.  Comparison between the conventional and Bayesian approaches to evaluate measurement data , 2006 .

[27]  Mark D. Semon,et al.  POSTUSE REVIEW: An Introduction to Error Analysis: The Study of Uncertainties in Physical Measurements , 1982 .

[28]  Saalih Allie,et al.  Impact of a conventional introductory laboratory course on the understanding of measurement , 2008 .

[29]  M Ballico,et al.  Limitations of the Welch-Satterthwaite approximation for measurement uncertainty calculations , 2000 .

[30]  Clemens Elster,et al.  Draft GUM Supplement 1 and Bayesian analysis , 2007 .

[31]  Saalih Allie,et al.  Effectiveness of a GUM-compliant course for teaching measurement in the introductory physics laboratory , 2008 .