The delay-reduction hypothesis: Extension to three-alternative choice.

[1]  R. Herrnstein.  SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT AND RATE OF PRIMARY REINFORCEMENT. , 1964, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[2]  Edmund Fantino,et al.  The experimental analysis of behavior : a biological perspective , 1979 .

[3]  W. Baum,et al.  Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice. , 1979, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[4]  E. Fantino,et al.  The delay-reduction hypothesis of conditioned reinforcement and punishment: Observing behavior. , 1981, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[5]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis , 1979 .

[6]  D Macewen,et al.  The effects of terminal-link fixed-interval and variable-interval schedules on responding under concurrent chained schedules. , 1972, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[7]  E Fantino,et al.  An appraisal of preference for multiple versus mixed schedules. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[8]  A. Tversky.  Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. , 1972 .

[9]  S S Pliskoff,et al.  Matching with a trio of concurrent variable-interval schedules of reinforcement. , 1976, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[10]  Masato Ito,et al.  Choice behavior of rats in a concurrent-chains schedule: Amount and delay of reinforcement. , 1982, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[11]  R. Herrnstein.  On the law of effect. , 1970, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[12]  Drazen Prelec,et al.  Feedback functions for reinforcement: A paradigmatic experiment , 1978 .

[13]  D L Myers,et al.  Undermatching: a reappraisal of performance on concurrent variable-interval schedules of reinforcement. , 1977, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[14]  Drazen Prelec,et al.  Matching, maximizing, and the hyperbolic reinforcement feedback function. , 1982 .

[15]  M C Davison,et al.  Preference for fixed-interval schedules: effects of initial-link length. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[16]  R. Luce,et al.  The Choice Axiom after Twenty Years , 1977 .

[17]  Edmund Fantino,et al.  Recent Developments In Choice , 1974, Psychology of Learning and Motivation.

[18]  M Davison,et al.  Preference in concurrent variable-interval fixed-ratio schedules. , 1982, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[19]  R J HERRNSTEIN,et al.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. , 1961, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[20]  W Temple,et al.  Preference for fixed-interval terminal links in a three-key concurrent chain schedule. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[21]  Edmund Fantino,et al.  CHOICE FOR PERIODIC SCHEDULES OF REINFORCEMENT1 , 1970 .

[22]  Donald H. Loveland,et al.  Matching when the number of response alternatives is large , 1974 .

[23]  N Squires,et al.  A model for choice in simple concurrent and concurrent-chains schedules. , 1971, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[24]  E. Fantino.  Choice and rate of reinforcement. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[25]  I W Hunter,et al.  Performance on variable-interval schedules arranged singly and concurrently. , 1976, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.