Evaluation of Different Varieties of Pea under AgroClimatic Conditions of Gilgit-Baltistan

Brief Research Report | Volume 5 | Number 2| 50 Copyright 2019 by Khan F. This is an open-access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which allows to copy, redistribute, remix, transform, and reproduce in any medium or format, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited. cc Introduction Pea (Pisumsativum L) is an important crop which is used both as food and fodder purpose. Peas are highly nutritious; pea is used both as vegetable and pulse. Materials and Methods Five pea varieties were evaluated for their performance at mountain agricultural research centre (MARC), Juglote, Gilgit during 2017. The varieties are climax, pasan, rondo, meteor and green feast. Results Differences among plant heights of pea varieties were significant with maximum plant height of 85.25 cm noted in plots of variety climax, while the minimum plant height of 45.75 cm was recorded in plots of variety rondo. Number of branches per plant of the different varieties ranged significantly from a minimum of 2.15 (green feast)to a maximum of 4.00 (meteor). Average number of pods per plant varied significantly between 10.84 and 13.71.Maximum pods per plant were found from variety climax (13.71) followed by green feast (13.58). Maximum pod length of 7.900 cm was recorded for variety Rondo, followed by variety green feast with pod length of 5.800 cm, while the minimum of 5.220 cm was recorded for the verity meteor. Maximum pod weight 26.29 kg per plot was obtained from variety climax, followed by 21.75 kg per plot from variety green feast, the minimum pods weight was recorded for variety meteor 16.20 kg per plot. Difference in pods yield of the five varieties were significant, with a maximum pods yield of 3585 kg per hectare recorded for variety climax, followed by 3545 kg per hectare for cultivar green feast and minimum of 2491 kg per hectare noted for variety rondo. Conclusion Therefore, variety climax being the highest yielder can be recommended to the pea growers of Gilgit-Baltistan for commercial cultivation.

[1]  M. Bhagat,et al.  Varietal evaluation of garden pea under semi-arid conditions of Vidharba region , 2016 .

[2]  Anayatur Rehman,et al.  Screening of Pea Cultivars for Yield and Resistance towards Powdery Mildew in Dry Temperate Zone, Kaghan Valley , 2013 .

[3]  N. Habib,et al.  Off-Season Pea Cultivation in Dir Kohistan Valley , 2003 .

[4]  N. Badshah,et al.  Study on the Adaptive Behaviour of Exotic Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Varieties under Local Conditions of Peshawar , 2002 .

[5]  Amanullah,et al.  Grain Yield Potential of Field Pea (Pisum arvense L.) Germplasm , 2002 .

[6]  M. Santalla,et al.  Food and feed potential breeding value of green, dry and vegetable pea germplasm , 2001 .

[7]  F. Muehlbauer,et al.  Biomass production and related characters in the core collection of Pisum germplasm , 2001, Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution.

[8]  K. Rajappan,et al.  Chemical control of powdery mildew of pea , 2000 .

[9]  Shivani,et al.  Evaluation of different varieties of pea (Pisum sativum L.) for yield and quality under late sown conditions in Eastern region , 2017 .

[10]  R. Ahmad,et al.  Qualitative and Quantitative Response of Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Cultivars to Judicious Applications of Irrigation with Phosphorus and Potassium , 2011 .

[11]  Prajyoti Singh,et al.  Effect of sowing dates and varieties on yield and quality of garden pea seed , 2011 .

[12]  Manish Kumar,et al.  GENETIC PARAMETERS AND CHARACTER ASSOCIATION IN GARDEN PEA (PISUM SATIVUM l.) CULTIVARS , 2008 .

[13]  A. Pandey,et al.  Integrated weed management in gardenpea under mid-hills of north-west Himalayas. , 2000 .

[14]  T. Mahmood,et al.  Comparative evaluation of some foreign and local pea cultivars. , 1988 .