What Is The Difference? The Case Of Two Erp Implementations

Abstract This is a unique case study as it is based on two "twin" case studies rather than one. The two cases studies, one from Italy and one from the US, describe the implementation of a SAP Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system in two similar organizations. Both organizations are mid-sized companies with similar size workforce and similar size annual sales. Both are in the electronics and telecommunications area. However, this is where the similarity ends. As indicated in the two case studies, the implementation process of the ERP systems, which followed similar steps, unfolded quite differently and resulted in very different outcomes. Thus, while the Italian implementation project met all its goals and was perceived by all participants as a success story, this was not the case for the American project. This teaching case study should give readers an understanding of the stages that a typical ERP implementation project follows, as well as, enable readers to understand the impact that individual, group, organization and national culture variables, have on how the process of implementing ERP systems unfolds and what may contribute to its final outcome.

[1]  G. Hofstede.  Motivation, leadership, and organization: Do American theories apply abroad? , 1980 .

[2]  Young-Gul Kim,et al.  The critical success factors for ERP implementation: an organizational fit perspective , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[3]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Enterprise resource planning: multisite ERP implementations , 2000, CACM.

[4]  Sanjay Kumar,et al.  Erp Implementation In Tata Steel: Focus On Benefits And Roi , 2009 .

[5]  M. Markus,et al.  Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research , 1988 .

[6]  Vinod Kumar,et al.  Enterprise resource planning systems adoption process: A survey of Canadian organizations , 2002 .

[7]  Dinesh A. Mirchandani,et al.  Successful implementation of ERP projects: Evidence from two case studies , 2002 .

[8]  Girish H. Subramanian,et al.  An Exploratory Case Study of Enterprise Resource Planning Implementation , 2005, Int. J. Enterp. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Felix B. Tan,et al.  Beyond Models of National Culture in Information Systems Research , 2002, J. Glob. Inf. Manag..

[10]  Deepinder S. Bajwa,et al.  An Integrative Framework for the Assimilation of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems: Phases, Antecedents, and Outcomes , 2004, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[11]  J. Motwani,et al.  Global Auto: The ERP Implementation Project , 2006 .

[12]  Guido Capaldo,et al.  A planned-oriented approach for EPR implementation strategy selection , 2009, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[13]  G. Hofstede.  The business of international business is culture , 1994 .

[14]  Toni M. Somers,et al.  A taxonomy of players and activities across the ERP project life cycle , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[15]  Sia Siew Kien,et al.  Enterprise resource planning: cultural fits and misfits: is ERP a universal solution? , 2000, CACM.

[16]  Fethi Calisir,et al.  The relation of interface usability characteristics, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use to end-user satisfaction with enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems , 2004, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[17]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Issues in implementing ERP: A case study , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  G. Hofstede.  The Cultural Relativity of Organizational Practices and Theories , 1983 .

[19]  G. Ioannou *,et al.  Theory of constraints-based methodology for effective ERP implementations , 2004 .

[20]  Frantz Rowe,et al.  The effects of enterprise resource planning implementation strategy on cross‐functionality , 2006, Inf. Syst. J..

[21]  Abdullah S. Al-Mudimigh,et al.  Enterprise resource planning: A taxonomy of critical factors , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[22]  Majed A. Al-Mashari,et al.  The effective application of SAP R/3: a proposed model of best practice , 2000 .

[23]  Robert M. Davison,et al.  Cultural complications of ERP , 2002, CACM.

[24]  E. Clemons,et al.  Newly vulnerable markets in an age of pure information products: an analysis of online music and online news , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[25]  Ben Light,et al.  The maintenance implications of the customization of ERP software , 2001, J. Softw. Maintenance Res. Pract..

[26]  Jeanne W. Ross,et al.  The ERP Revolution: Surviving vs. Thriving , 2000, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[27]  Geert Hofstede,et al.  Management scientists are human , 1994 .

[28]  Mark Srite,et al.  Levels of Culture and Individual Behavior: An Investigative Perspective , 2005, J. Glob. Inf. Manag..

[29]  Ben Light,et al.  A Critical Success Factors Model for ERP Implementation , 1999, IEEE Softw..