Investment Incentives in Open-Source and Proprietary Two-Sided Platforms

We study incentives to invest in platform quality in open-source and proprietary two-sided platforms. Open platforms have open access, and developers invest to improve the platform. Proprietary platforms have closed access, and investment is done by the platform owner. We present five main results. First, open platforms may benefit from limited developer access. Second, an open platform may lead to higher investment than a proprietary platform. Third, opening one side of a proprietary platform may lower incentives to invest in platform quality. Fourth, the structure of access prices of the proprietary platform depends on (i) how changes in the number of developers affect the incentives to invest in the open platform, and (ii) how investment in the open platform affects the revenues of the proprietary platform. Finally, a proprietary platform may benefit from higher investment in the open platform. This result helps explain why the owner of a proprietary platform such as Microsoft has chosen to contribute to the development of Linux.

[1]  Chaim Fershtman,et al.  A Brief Survey of the Economics of Open Source Software , 2011 .

[2]  A. Dixit,et al.  Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity , 1977 .

[3]  Geoffrey G. Parker,et al.  Two-Sided Network Effects: A Theory of Information Product Design , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[4]  Nicholas Economides,et al.  Two-Sided Competition of Proprietary vs. Open Source Technology Platforms and the Implications for the Software Industry , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[5]  Andrei Hagiu,et al.  Proprietary vs. Open Two-Sided Platforms and Social Efficiency , 2006 .

[6]  Haim Mendelson,et al.  Divide and Conquer: Competing with Free Technology Under Network Effects , 2008 .

[7]  Alexandre Gaudeul,et al.  Competition between open-source and proprietary software: the (La)TeX case study , 2004 .

[8]  J. Tirole,et al.  The Economics of Technology Sharing: Open Source and Beyond , 2004 .

[9]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  The Promise of Research on Open Source Software , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[10]  Sonali K. Shah Motivation, Governance, and the Viability of Hybrid Forms in Open Source Software Development , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[11]  Mikko Mustonen,et al.  Copyleft - the economics of Linux and other open source software , 2003, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[12]  Andrea Fosfuri,et al.  The Penguin Has Entered the Building: The Commercialization of Open Source Software Products , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[13]  Ramon Casadesus-Masanell,et al.  Dynamic Mixed Duopoly: A Model Motivated by Linux vs. Windows , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[14]  Daniel F. Spulber Market Making by Price-Setting Firms , 1996 .

[15]  B. Caillaud,et al.  Chicken & Egg: Competition Among Intermediation Service Providers , 2003 .

[16]  Utpal M. Dholakia,et al.  Open Source Software User Communities: A Study of Participation in Linux User Groups , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[17]  Volker Nocke,et al.  Platform Ownership , 2004 .

[18]  J. Rochet,et al.  Platform competition in two sided markets , 2003 .

[19]  J. Rochet,et al.  Two-sided markets: a progress report , 2006 .

[20]  Ramon Casadesus-Masanell,et al.  Platform Competition, Compatibility, and Social Efficiency , 2008 .

[21]  Ramon Casadesus-Masanell,et al.  Mixed Source , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[22]  Gastón Llanes,et al.  Industry Equilibrium with Open Source and Proprietary Firms , 2013 .

[23]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Innovation and Price Competition in a Two-Sided Market , 2011, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Andrei Hagiu Pricing and commitment by two‐sided platforms , 2006 .

[25]  M. Armstrong Competition in Two-Sided Markets ¤ , 2005 .

[26]  Sandra Slaughter,et al.  Understanding the Motivations, Participation, and Performance of Open Source Software Developers: A Longitudinal Study of the Apache Projects , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[27]  Jürgen Bitzer,et al.  Commercial versus open source software: the role of product heterogeneity in competition , 2004 .

[28]  Alisha C. Holland,et al.  A Price Theory of Multi-Sided Platforms , 2009 .

[29]  Paul Belleflamme,et al.  Platform Competition and Seller Investment Incentives , 2010 .

[30]  Nicholas Economides,et al.  Linux vs. Windows: A Comparison of Application and Platform Innovation Incentives for Open Source and Proprietary Software Platforms , 2005 .

[31]  Andrei Hagiu Merchant or Two-Sided Platform? , 2006 .

[32]  Daniel F. Spulber Firms and Networks in Two-Sided Markets: Handbooks in Information Systems, Volume 1 , 2006 .