Data Assimilation of Wildfires with Fuel Adjustment Factors in farsite using Ensemble Kalman Filtering*

Abstract This paper shows the extension of the wildfire simulation tool FARSITE to allow for data assimilation capabilities on both fire perimeters and fuel adjustment factors to improve the accuracy of wildfire spread predictions. While fire perimeters characterize the overall burn scar of a wildfire, fuel adjustment factors are fuel model specific calibration numbers that adjust the rate of spread for each fuel type independently. Data assimilation updates of both fire perimeters and fuel adjustment factors are calculated from an Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF) that exploits the uncertainty information on the simulated fire perimeter, fuel adjustment factors and a measured fire perimeter. The effectiveness of the proposed data assimilation is illustrated on a wildfire simulation representing the 2014 Cocos fire, tracking time varying fuel adjustment factors based on noisy and limited spatial resolution observations of the fire perimeter.

[1]  C. E. Van Wagner,et al.  Conditions for the start and spread of crown fire , 1977 .

[2]  Xiaolin Hu,et al.  Data assimilation using sequential monte carlo methods in wildfire spread simulation , 2012, TOMC.

[3]  D. Bernstein,et al.  What is the ensemble Kalman filter and how well does it work? , 2006, 2006 American Control Conference.

[4]  Ilkay Altintas,et al.  Wildfire Spread Prediction and Assimilation for FARSITE Using Ensemble Kalman Filtering , 2016, ICCS.

[5]  Minjeong Kim,et al.  Data assimilation for wildland fires , 2007, IEEE Control Systems.

[6]  Jonathan D. Beezley,et al.  An Ensemble Kalman-Particle Predictor-Corrector Filter for Non-Gaussian Data Assimilation , 2008, ICCS.

[7]  Didier Lucor,et al.  Interactive comment on “Towards predictive data-driven simulations of wildfire spread – Part I: Reduced-cost Ensemble Kalman Filter based on a Polynomial Chaos surrogate model for parameter estimation” , 2014 .

[8]  Wei Zhao,et al.  A Note on Dynamic Data Driven Wildfire Modeling , 2004, International Conference on Computational Science.

[9]  R. Rothermel A Mathematical Model for Predicting Fire Spread in Wildland Fuels , 2017 .

[10]  M. Finney FARSITE : Fire Area Simulator : model development and evaluation , 1998 .

[11]  Jonathan D. Beezley,et al.  Data driven computing by the morphing fast Fourier transform ensemble Kalman filter in epidemic spread simulations , 2010, ICCS.

[12]  Guan Qin,et al.  Towards a Dynamic Data Driven Application System for Wildfire Simulation , 2005, International Conference on Computational Science.

[13]  Warren B. Powell,et al.  The Effect of Robust Decisions on the Cost of Uncertainty in Military Airlift Operations , 2011, TOMC.

[14]  R. M. Nelson,et al.  Prediction of diurnal change in 10-h fuel stick moisture content , 2000 .

[15]  Jack D. Cohen,et al.  The 1978 National Fire-Danger Rating System: technical documentation , 1984 .

[16]  R. Rothermel,et al.  Predicting Behavior and Size of Crown Fires in the Northern Rocky Mountains , 2018 .

[17]  Arnaud Trouvé,et al.  Towards predictive data-driven simulations of wildfire spread - Part II: Ensemble Kalman Filter for the state estimation of a front-tracking simulator of wildfire spread , 2014 .

[18]  Jonathan D. Beezley,et al.  ENSEMBLE KALMAN FILTERS IN COUPLED ATMOSPHERE-SURFACE MODELS , 2009 .

[19]  Ross J. Phillips,et al.  Assessment of the FARSITE model for predicting fire behavior in the Southern Appalachian Mountains , 2006 .

[20]  G. Evensen Data Assimilation: The Ensemble Kalman Filter , 2006 .

[21]  Geir Evensen,et al.  The Ensemble Kalman Filter: theoretical formulation and practical implementation , 2003 .