Comparison of human and humanoid robot control of upright stance

There is considerable recent interest in developing humanoid robots. An important substrate for many motor actions in both humans and biped robots is the ability to maintain a statically or dynamically stable posture. Given the success of the human design, one would expect there are lessons to be learned in formulating a postural control mechanism for robots. In this study we limit ourselves to considering the problem of maintaining upright stance. Human stance control is compared to a suggested method for robot stance control called zero moment point (ZMP) compensation. Results from experimental and modeling studies suggest there are two important subsystems that account for the low- and mid-frequency (DC to approximately 1Hz) dynamic characteristics of human stance control. These subsystems are (1) a "sensory integration" mechanism whereby orientation information from multiple sensory systems encoding body kinematics (i.e. position, velocity) is flexibly combined to provide an overall estimate of body orientation while allowing adjustments (sensory re-weighting) that compensate for changing environmental conditions and (2) an "effort control" mechanism that uses kinetic-related (i.e., force-related) sensory information to reduce the mean deviation of body orientation from upright. Functionally, ZMP compensation is directly analogous to how humans appear to use kinetic feedback to modify the main sensory integration feedback loop controlling body orientation. However, a flexible sensory integration mechanism is missing from robot control leaving the robot vulnerable to instability in conditions where humans are able to maintain stance. We suggest the addition of a simple form of sensory integration to improve robot stance control. We also investigate how the biological constraint of feedback time delay influences the human stance control design. The human system may serve as a guide for improved robot control, but should not be directly copied because the constraints on robot and human control are different.

[1]  Ian David Loram,et al.  Direct measurement of human ankle stiffness during quiet standing: the intrinsic mechanical stiffness is insufficient for stability , 2002, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  Prahlad Vadakkepat,et al.  Disturbance rejection by online ZMP compensation , 2008, Robotica.

[3]  L. Nashner.  Adaptation of human movement to altered environments , 1982, Trends in Neurosciences.

[4]  T. Mergner,et al.  Multisensory control of human upright stance , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  Frans C. T. van der Helm,et al.  An adaptive model of sensory integration in a dynamic environment applied to human stance control , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[6]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.

[7]  V. J. Wilson,et al.  Mammalian Vestibular Physiology , 1979, Springer US.

[8]  R Johansson,et al.  Significance of pressor input from the human feet in anterior-posterior postural control. The effect of hypothermia on vibration-induced body-sway. , 1990, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[9]  Régine Roll,et al.  From balance regulation to body orientation: two goals for muscle proprioceptive information processing? , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  Robert J Peterka,et al.  Dynamic regulation of sensorimotor integration in human postural control. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  A. Berthoz,et al.  Visual contribution to rapid motor responses during postural control , 1978, Brain Research.

[12]  Christian Darlot,et al.  Using sensory weighting to model the influence of canal, otolith and visual cues on spatial orientation and eye movements , 2002, Biological Cybernetics.

[13]  F Hlavacka,et al.  Postural responses evoked by sinusoidal galvanic stimulation of the labyrinth. Influence of head position. , 1985, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[14]  T. Mergner,et al.  Human stance control beyond steady state response and inverted pendulum simplification , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  F. O. Black,et al.  Adaptation to altered support and visual conditions during stance: patients with vestibular deficits , 1982, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[16]  Patrick J. Loughlin,et al.  Sensory adaptation in human balance control: Lessons for biomimetic robotic bipeds , 2008, Neural Networks.

[17]  R. Peterka,et al.  Stimulus-dependent changes in the vestibular contribution to human postural control. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Russ Tedrake,et al.  Efficient Bipedal Robots Based on Passive-Dynamic Walkers , 2005, Science.

[19]  L. Zupan,et al.  Neural processing of gravitoinertial cues in humans. III. Modeling tilt and translation responses. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  T. Mergner,et al.  Human balance control during cutaneous stimulation of the plantar soles , 2001, Neuroscience Letters.

[21]  Friedrich Pfeiffer,et al.  Sensors and Control Concept of Walking “Johnnie” , 2003, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[22]  David N. Lee.  Visual proprioceptive control of stance , 1975 .

[23]  Thomas Mergner,et al.  Biological and engineering approaches to human postural control , 2007, Integr. Comput. Aided Eng..

[24]  J. Coast.  Handbook of Physiology. Section 12. Exercise: Regulation and Integration of Multiple Systems , 1997 .

[25]  Miomir Vukobratovic,et al.  Zero-Moment Point - Thirty Five Years of its Life , 2004, Int. J. Humanoid Robotics.

[26]  Thomas Mergner,et al.  Modeling sensorimotor control of human upright stance. , 2007, Progress in brain research.

[27]  S Glasauer,et al.  A Simple Model of Vestibular Canal‐Otolith Signal Fusion , 1999, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[28]  R. Peterka.  Sensorimotor integration in human postural control. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  B. Day,et al.  Human body‐segment tilts induced by galvanic stimulation: a vestibularly driven balance protection mechanism. , 1997, The Journal of physiology.

[30]  D. Winter,et al.  Stiffness control of balance in quiet standing. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  P. Morasso,et al.  Ankle muscle stiffness alone cannot stabilize balance during quiet standing. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  R. Caballero,et al.  Methodology for Zero-moment Point Experimental Modeling in the Frequency Domain , 2006 .

[33]  Milos R Popovic,et al.  Controlling balance during quiet standing: proportional and derivative controller generates preceding motor command to body sway position observed in experiments. , 2006, Gait & posture.

[34]  P. Morasso,et al.  Direct measurement of ankle stiffness during quiet standing: implications for control modelling and clinical application. , 2005, Gait & posture.

[35]  Frans C. T. van der Helm,et al.  Comparison of different methods to identify and quantify balance control , 2005, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[36]  B J Hess,et al.  Computation of Inertial Motion: Neural Strategies to Resolve Ambiguous Otolith Information , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  Dora E Angelaki,et al.  Computational approaches to spatial orientation: from transfer functions to dynamic Bayesian inference. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  R.J. Peterka,et al.  Simplifying the complexities of maintaining balance , 2003, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.