Invention and Transfer of Climate Change–Mitigation Technologies: A Global Analysis

This article uses the European Patent Office Worldwide Patent Statistical Database to examine the geographic distribution and global diffusion of inventions in thirteen climate-mitigation technologies since 1978. The data suggest that until 1990 innovation was driven mostly by energy prices. Since then, environmental policies, and, more recently, climate policies, have accelerated the pace of innovation. The data also indicate that innovation is highly concentrated in three countries-Japan, Germany, and the United States-which together account for 60 percent of total inventions. Surprisingly, the contribution of emerging economies is far from negligible as China and Brazil together account for about 10 percent of total inventions. However, inventions from emerging economies are less likely to find markets beyond their borders, suggesting that inventions from emerging economies have less value. More generally, international transfers occur mostly between developed countries (73 percent of all exported inventions). Exports from developed countries to emerging economies are still limited (22 percent) but are growing rapidly, especially to China.

[1]  D. Popp International Technology Transfer, Climate Change, and the Clean Development Mechanism , 2011, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[2]  N. Johnstone,et al.  Climate Policy and Technological Innovation and Transfer: An Overview of Trends and Recent Empirical Results , 2010 .

[3]  Keith E. Maskus,et al.  Differentiated Intellectual Property Regimes for Environmental and Climate Technologies , 2010 .

[4]  Thijs Dekker,et al.  Inciting Protocols - How International Environmental Agreements Trigger Knowledge Transfers , 2009 .

[5]  Holger Görg,et al.  What Determines Innovation Activity in Chinese State-owned Enterprises? The Role of Foreign Direct Investment , 2009 .

[6]  Maria Luisa Mancusi,et al.  International spillovers and absorptive capacity: A cross-country cross-sector analysis based on patents and citations , 2008 .

[7]  Jim Watson,et al.  Key policy considerations for facilitating low carbon technology transfer to developing countries , 2008 .

[8]  Carmelo Pierpaolo Parello,et al.  A north-south model of intellectual property rights protection and skill accumulation , 2008 .

[9]  D. Popp,et al.  Renewable Energy Policies and Technological Innovation: Evidence Based on Patent Counts , 2008 .

[10]  David Popp,et al.  Policy vs. Consumer Pressure: Innovation and Diffusion of Alternative Bleaching Technologies in the Pulp Industry , 2007 .

[11]  Ulrich Schmoch,et al.  National Systems of Innovation in Comparison: Structure and Performance Indicators for Knowledge Societies , 2006 .

[12]  Max Åhman,et al.  Government policy and the development of electric vehicles in Japan , 2006 .

[13]  Cristina Tébar Less,et al.  Achieving the Successful Transfer of Environmentally Sound Technologies: Trade-related Aspects , 2005 .

[14]  Giovanni Peri,et al.  Determinants of Knowledge Flows and Their Effect on Innovation , 2005, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[15]  P. Thompson,et al.  Patent Citations and the Geography of Knowledge Spillovers: A Reassessment , 2005 .

[16]  K. Maskus,et al.  Transfer of Technology to Developing Countries: Unilateral and Multilateral Policy Options , 2004 .

[17]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Citations, Family Size, Opposition and the Value of Patent Rights Have Profited from Comments and Suggestions , 2002 .

[18]  Daniel M. Kammen,et al.  Photovoltaic module quality in the Kenyan solar home systems market , 2002 .

[19]  W. Fox Methodological and technological issues in technology transfer , 2002 .

[20]  Pamela J. D. Smith How do foreign patent rights affect U.S. exports, affiliate sales, and licenses? , 2001 .

[21]  David Popp,et al.  Induced Innovation and Energy Prices , 2001 .

[22]  K. Maskus,et al.  Intellectual property rights and licensing: An econometric investigation , 2001 .

[23]  Andrea Fosfuri,et al.  Foreign direct investment and spillovers through workers’ mobility , 2001 .

[24]  Kamal Saggi,et al.  Trade , Foreign Direct Investment , and International Technology Transfer : A Survey * , 2000 .

[25]  Jonathan Eaton,et al.  International Technology Diffusion: Theory and Measurement , 1999 .

[26]  A. Jaffe,et al.  The Induced Innovation Hypothesis and Energy-Saving Technological Change , 1998 .

[27]  Jean O. Lanjouw,et al.  How to Count Patents and Value Intellectual Property: Uses of Patent Renewal and Application Data , 1996 .

[28]  Ashoka Mody,et al.  Innovation and the international diffusion of environmentally responsive technology , 1996 .

[29]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  Intellectual Property Protection and U.S. Foreign Direct Investment , 1996 .

[30]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Environmental Regulation and Innovation: A Panel Data Study , 1996, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[31]  Wolfgang Keller,et al.  Absorptive capacity: On the creation and acquisition of technology in development , 1996 .

[32]  Jonathan Eaton,et al.  Trade in Ideas: Patenting and Productivity in the OECD , 1995 .

[33]  Elhanan Helpman,et al.  North-South R&D Spillovers , 1994, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[34]  P. Romer,et al.  Economic Integration and Endogenous Growth , 1990 .

[35]  Z. Griliches Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[36]  A. Jäger-Waldau PV STATUS REPORT 2008 , 2008 .

[37]  John H. Barton,et al.  Intellectual Property and Access to Clean Energy Technologies in Developing Countries , 2007 .

[38]  Rainer Frietsch,et al.  Technological Structures and Performance as Reflected by Patent Indicators , 2006 .

[39]  Keith E. Maskus,et al.  Encouraging International Technology Transfer , 2004 .

[40]  Bruno Van Pottelsberghe,et al.  Using patent counts for cross-country comparisons of technology output , 2001 .

[41]  Bruno Van Pottelsberghe,et al.  Applications grants and the value of patents , 2000 .

[42]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  Potentials and policy implications of energy and material efficiency improvement , 1997 .