The Incubus Paradox: Attempts at Foundational Rethinking of the “SME Support Genre”

Despite the lacking scientific support regarding efficiency, public authorities launch and owner-managers’ participate in public support programmes. Previous research has failed to address this enigma and dissolve the underlying paradox. Drawing on mythical inspiration, this article offers a framework grounded on the medieval demonic character of incubus/subbuci, by means of which this incubus paradox is analytically treated. Empirically, an indirect approach based on inserting a fictive case into a general focus-group method is adopted, thus avoiding leading questions. Two images of the small-business support syndrome emerge from the proposed mythical framework: The first one, which could be named just “incubus” ascribes malevolence to the helpers and a good deal of naivety on the part of the support programme participants. The second one, the paradox, suggests that there will be no measurable growth effect of support measures since none of the stakeholders identified in this discourse intend to actually foster development and growth in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The field material indicates that these two images jointly provide a comprehensive understanding, that there is not an incubus and a victim but rather several incubuses operating within the confines of a support programme. Thus, instead of claiming that the support agents are malevolent, the conclusion is that they have their own agenda. Since our inquiry, in addition indicates that this is true also for the participating SME representatives, they can hardly be seen as victims in the traditional sense. They rather exploit an arena where it is possible to strengthen one's own identity as responsible business persons bringing financial support to their region.

[1]  E. F. Schumacher.  Small Is Beautiful: Economics as if People Mattered , 1973 .

[2]  An Epic Incubus , 1976 .

[3]  Raschka Lb.  The incubus syndrome. A variant of erotomania. , 1979 .

[4]  The incubus syndrome. A variant of erotomania. , 1979, Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie.

[5]  Colin S. Brown,et al.  The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions and Actions in Organizations , 1991 .

[6]  William B. Gartner,et al.  Words lead to deeds: Towards an organizational emergence vocabulary , 1993 .

[7]  Anders W Johansson.  Att förstå rådgivning till småföretagare , 1997 .

[8]  S. Sarasvathy.  Causation and Effectuation: Toward a Theoretical Shift from Economic Inevitability to Entrepreneurial Contingency , 2001 .

[9]  Jane Frankland,et al.  Focus groups in social research: Introducing qualitative methods , 2001 .

[10]  Nils Brunsson.  The Organization Of Hypocrisy , 2002 .

[11]  C. Andreou,et al.  Incubus syndrome and folie à deux: a case report. , 2003, European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists.

[12]  Pia Bülow,et al.  Who's talking: drawing conclusions from focus groups—some methodological considerations , 2003 .

[13]  Guje Sevón,et al.  The Northern lights : organization theory in Scandinavia , 2003 .

[14]  A. Johansson,et al.  Public advisory services - theory and practice , 2003 .

[15]  B. Johannisson,et al.  Entrepreneurship as Discourse and Life Style , 2003 .

[16]  D. Storey,et al.  An assessment of a venture creation programme: the case of Shell LiveWIRE , 2004 .

[17]  D. Faoite,et al.  Entrepreneurs' attitudes to training and support initiatives: evidence from Ireland and The Netherlands , 2004 .

[18]  Jackie Hartman,et al.  Using Focus Groups to Conduct Business Communication Research , 2004 .

[19]  Johan Lambrecht,et al.  An evaluation of public support measures for private external consultancies to SMEs in the Walloon Region of Belgium , 2005 .

[20]  M. Kostera.  The Quest for the Self-Actualizing Organization , 2005 .

[21]  D. Côté-Arsenault,et al.  Maintaining your focus in focus groups: avoiding common mistakes. , 2005, Research in nursing & health.

[22]  Between a Rock and a Smooth Space : The hypocrisy of a striated refuge , 2006 .

[23]  Blake Poland,et al.  Focus group research and "the patient's view". , 2006, Social science & medicine.

[24]  Hur kan ledningsgruppen försäkra sig om att ett budskap uppfattas på önskat sätt? : en fallstudie av institutionen för industriell ekonomi och samhällsvetenskap , 2007 .

[25]  Bengt Johannisson,et al.  Bridging the Functional and Territorial Rationales—Proposing an Integrating Framework for Regional Dynamics , 2009 .

[26]  Håkan Ylinenpää,et al.  Entrepreneurship and Innovation Systems: Towards a Development of the ERIS/IRIS Concept , 2009 .

[27]  J. Ivey.  Focus groups. , 2011, Pediatric nursing.