Predicting Future Disease Activity and Treatment Responders for Multiple Sclerosis Patients Using a Bag-of-Lesions Brain Representation

The growth of lesions and the development of new lesions in MRI are markers of new disease activity in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients. Successfully predicting future lesion activity could lead to a better understanding of disease worsening, as well as prediction of treatment efficacy. We introduce the first, fully automatic, probabilistic framework for the prediction of future lesion activity in relapsing-remitting MS patients, based only on baseline multi-modal MRI, and use it to successfully identify responders to two different treatments. We develop a new Bag-of-Lesions (BoL) representation for patient images based on a variety of features extracted from lesions. A probabilistic codebook of lesion types is created by clustering features using Gaussian mixture models. Patients are represented as a probabilistic histogram of lesion-types. A Random Forest classifier is trained to automatically predict future MS activity up to two years ahead based on the patient’s baseline BoL representation. The framework is trained and tested on a large, proprietary, multi-centre, multi-modal clinical trial dataset consisting of 1048 patients. Testing based on 50-fold cross validation shows that our framework compares favourably to several other classifiers. Automated identification of responders in two different treated groups of patients leads to sensitivity of 82% and 84% and specificity of 92% and 94% respectively, showing that this is a very promising approach towards personalized treatment for MS patients.

[1]  G. Comi,et al.  Comparison of MRI criteria at first presentation to predict conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Fast robust automated brain extraction , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[4]  Cordelia Schmid,et al.  A sparse texture representation using local affine regions , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[5]  Ramón Díaz-Uriarte,et al.  Gene selection and classification of microarray data using random forest , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[6]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Scene Classification Via pLSA , 2006, ECCV.

[7]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  Face Description with Local Binary Patterns: Application to Face Recognition , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[8]  Peter A. Calabresi,et al.  A topology-preserving approach to the segmentation of brain images with multiple sclerosis lesions , 2010, NeuroImage.

[9]  D. Arnold,et al.  Placebo-controlled phase 3 study of oral BG-12 for relapsing multiple sclerosis. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Temporally Consistent Probabilistic Detection of New Multiple Sclerosis Lesions in Brain MRI , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  O. Ciccarelli,et al.  Brain atrophy and lesion load predict long term disability in multiple sclerosis , 2013, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[12]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Modeling the Variability in Brain Morphology and Lesion Distribution in Multiple Sclerosis by Deep Learning , 2014, MICCAI.

[13]  D. Chard,et al.  The role of MRI in the evaluation of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis , 2016, Expert review of neurotherapeutics.

[14]  Lisa Tang,et al.  Deep Learning of Brain Lesion Patterns for Predicting Future Disease Activity in Patients with Early Symptoms of Multiple Sclerosis , 2016, LABELS/DLMIA@MICCAI.