Roux-en-Y augmented gastric advancement: An alternative technique for concurrent esophageal and pyloric stenosis secondary to corrosive intake

Select group of patients with concurrent esophageal and gastric stricturing secondary to corrosive intake requires colonic or free jejunal transfer. These technically demanding reconstructions are associated with significant complications and have up to 18% ischemic conduit necrosis. Following corrosive intake, up to 30% of such patients have stricturing at the pyloro-duodenal canal area only and rest of the stomach is available for rather less complex and better perfused gastrointestinal reconstruction. Here we describe an alternative technique where we utilize stomach following distal gastric resection along with Roux-en-Y reconstruction instead of colonic or jejunal interposition. This neo-conduit is potentially superior in terms of perfusion, lower risk of gastro-esophageal anastomotic leakage and technical ease as opposed to colonic and jejunal counterparts. We have utilized the said technique in three patients with acceptable postoperative outcome. In addition this technique offers a feasible reconstruction plan in patients where colon is not available for reconstruction due to concomitant pathology. Utility of this technique may also merit consideration for gastroesophageal junction tumors.

[1]  S. Blackmon,et al.  Management of Conduit Necrosis Following Esophagectomy. , 2015, Thoracic surgery clinics.

[2]  S. Blackmon,et al.  Jejunal graft conduits after esophagectomy. , 2014, Journal of thoracic disease.

[3]  G. Hanna,et al.  Technical Factors that Affect Anastomotic Integrity Following Esophagectomy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis , 2013, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[4]  C. Lucas,et al.  Clinical evaluation and management of caustic injury in the upper gastrointestinal tract in 95 adult patients in an urban medical center , 2008, Surgical Endoscopy.

[5]  M. Orringer,et al.  Two Thousand Transhiatal Esophagectomies: Changing Trends, Lessons Learned , 2007, Annals of surgery.

[6]  H. Köksal,et al.  Colonic interposition vs. gastric pull-up after total esophagectomy , 2004, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.

[7]  K. McManus,et al.  Corrosive injury to upper gastrointestinal tract: Still a major surgical dilemma. , 2006, World journal of gastroenterology.

[8]  R. Heitmiller,et al.  Esophageal conduit necrosis. , 2006, Thoracic surgery clinics.

[9]  J. Peters,et al.  Prevalence and risk factors for ischemia, leak, and stricture of esophageal anastomosis: gastric pull-up versus colon interposition. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[10]  S. Law,et al.  Colonic interposition after esophagectomy for cancer. , 2003, Archives of surgery.

[11]  G. Carlson,et al.  Bowel interposition for esophageal replacement: twenty-five-year experience. , 1997, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[12]  A. Chaudhary,et al.  Elective Surgery for Corrosive-Induced Gastric Injury , 1996, World Journal of Surgery.

[13]  R. Moorehead,et al.  Gangrene in esophageal substitutes after resection and bypass procedures for carcinoma of the esophagus. , 1990, Hepato-gastroenterology.

[14]  E. Eypasch,et al.  Indications, Surgical Technique, and Long‐Term Functional Results of Colon Interposition or Bypass , 1988, Annals of surgery.

[15]  W. S. Ring,et al.  Technique of jejunal interposition for esophageal replacement. , 1982, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.