The splicing co-factor Barricade/Tat-SF1 is required for cell cycle and lineage progression in Drosophila neural stem cells

Stem cells need to balance self-renewal and differentiation for correct tissue development and homeostasis. Defects in this balance can lead to developmental defects or tumor formation. In recent years, mRNA splicing has emerged as an important mechanism regulating cell fate decisions. Here we address the role of the evolutionarily conserved splicing co-factor Barricade (Barc)/Tat-SF1/CUS2 in Drosophila neural stem cell (neuroblast) lineage formation. We show that Barc is required for the generation of neurons during Drosophila brain development by ensuring correct neural progenitor proliferation and differentiation. Barc associates with components of the U2 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (snRNP) complex, and its depletion causes alternative splicing in the form of intron retention in a subset of genes. Using bioinformatics analysis and a cell culture-based splicing assay, we found that Barc-dependent introns share three major traits: they are short, GC rich and have weak 3′ splice sites. Our results show that Barc, together with the U2 snRNP complex, plays an important role in regulating neural stem cell lineage progression during brain development and facilitates correct splicing of a subset of introns. Summary: Barricade associates with the U2 snRNP complex, prevents intron retention, and is required for neural progenitor cell proliferation and differentiation in the Drosophila larval brain.

[1]  Jason E. Waller,et al.  Division , 2018, Bad Arguments.

[2]  D. Kaida.  The reciprocal regulation between splicing and 3′‐end processing , 2016, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA.

[3]  A. Hoskins,et al.  Conformational dynamics of stem II of the U2 snRNA , 2016, RNA.

[4]  E. Salmon,et al.  Prolonged Mitosis of Neural Progenitors Alters Cell Fate in the Developing Brain , 2016, Neuron.

[5]  Amy Y. M. Au,et al.  Intron retention in mRNA: No longer nonsense , 2016, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[6]  Marko Repic,et al.  Proliferation control in neural stem and progenitor cells , 2015, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[7]  Christopher R. Sibley,et al.  Regulation of constitutive and alternative mRNA splicing across the human transcriptome by PRPF8 is determined by 5′ splice site strength , 2015, Genome Biology.

[8]  Li Yang,et al.  Regulation of alternative splicing in Drosophila by 56 RNA binding proteins , 2015, Genome research.

[9]  H. Dvinge,et al.  Widespread intron retention diversifies most cancer transcriptomes , 2015, Genome Medicine.

[10]  N. Katsanis,et al.  Rbm8a Haploinsufficiency Disrupts Embryonic Cortical Development Resulting in Microcephaly , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  S. Brenner,et al.  Regulation of Splicing Factors by Alternative Splicing and NMD Is Conserved between Kingdoms Yet Evolutionarily Flexible , 2015, Molecular biology and evolution.

[12]  F. Francis,et al.  Morphological and functional aspects of progenitors perturbed in cortical malformations , 2015, Front. Cell. Neurosci..

[13]  J. Golden,et al.  ARX regulates cortical intermediate progenitor cell expansion and upper layer neuron formation through repression of Cdkn1c. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  P. Sharp,et al.  Detained introns are a novel, widespread class of post-transcriptionally spliced introns , 2015, Genes & development.

[15]  Panagiotis K. Papasaikas,et al.  Functional splicing network reveals extensive regulatory potential of the core spliceosomal machinery. , 2014, Molecular cell.

[16]  J. Ellenberg,et al.  SNW1 enables sister chromatid cohesion by mediating the splicing of sororin and APC2 pre‐mRNAs , 2014, The EMBO journal.

[17]  B. Frey,et al.  Widespread intron retention in mammals functionally tunes transcriptomes , 2014, Genome research.

[18]  Davide Heller,et al.  STRING v10: protein–protein interaction networks, integrated over the tree of life , 2014, Nucleic Acids Res..

[19]  Sijun Zhu,et al.  The Drosophila Sp8 transcription factor Buttonhead prevents premature differentiation of intermediate neural progenitors , 2014, eLife.

[20]  Y. Dou,et al.  Trithorax maintains the functional heterogeneity of neural stem cells through the transcription factor Buttonhead , 2014, eLife.

[21]  R. Wechsler-Reya,et al.  The role of stem cells and progenitors in the genesis of medulloblastoma , 2014, Experimental Neurology.

[22]  M. Howell,et al.  Functional genomics identifies a requirement of pre-mRNA splicing factors for sister chromatid cohesion , 2014, The EMBO journal.

[23]  Grzegorz Sienski,et al.  Efficient CRISPR/Cas9 Plasmids for Rapid and Versatile Genome Editing in Drosophila , 2014, G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics.

[24]  R. Sachidanandam,et al.  The exon junction complex controls transposable element activity by ensuring faithful splicing of the piwi transcript , 2014, Genes & development.

[25]  Thomas R. Burkard,et al.  Ecdysone and Mediator Change Energy Metabolism to Terminate Proliferation in Drosophila Neural Stem Cells , 2014, Cell.

[26]  H. Reichert,et al.  Control of neural stem cell self-renewal and differentiation in Drosophila , 2014, Cell and Tissue Research.

[27]  H. Reichert,et al.  SWI/SNF Complex Prevents Lineage Reversion and Induces Temporal Patterning in Neural Stem Cells , 2014, Cell.

[28]  B. Porse,et al.  The functional consequences of intron retention: alternative splicing coupled to NMD as a regulator of gene expression. , 2014, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[29]  Juergen A. Knoblich,et al.  Long-Term Live Cell Imaging and Automated 4D Analysis of Drosophila Neuroblast Lineages , 2013, PloS one.

[30]  S. Kliver,et al.  Evolutionarily conserved features of the retained intron in alternative transcripts of the nxf1 (nuclear export factor) genes in different organisms , 2013 .

[31]  M. Selbach,et al.  Orchestrated Intron Retention Regulates Normal Granulocyte Differentiation , 2013, Cell.

[32]  C. Doe,et al.  Combinatorial temporal patterning in progenitors expands neural diversity , 2013, Nature.

[33]  J. Knoblich,et al.  FACS purification of Drosophila larval neuroblasts for next-generation sequencing , 2013, Nature Protocols.

[34]  N. Perrimon,et al.  Inducing RNAi in Drosophila cells by transfection with dsRNA. , 2013, Cold Spring Harbor protocols.

[35]  J. Knoblich,et al.  Drosophila neuroblasts: a model for stem cell biology , 2012, Development.

[36]  Thomas R. Burkard,et al.  FACS Purification and Transcriptome Analysis of Drosophila Neural Stem Cells Reveals a Role for Klumpfuss in Self-Renewal , 2012, Cell reports.

[37]  Schraga Schwartz,et al.  Differential GC content between exons and introns establishes distinct strategies of splice-site recognition. , 2012, Cell reports.

[38]  Karl Mechtler,et al.  Analysis of protein mixtures from whole-cell extracts by single-run nanoLC-MS/MS using ultralong gradients , 2012, Nature Protocols.

[39]  W. Huber,et al.  Detecting differential usage of exons from RNA-seq data , 2012, Genome research.

[40]  S. Ackerman,et al.  Mutation of a U2 snRNA Gene Causes Global Disruption of Alternative Splicing and Neurodegeneration , 2012, Cell.

[41]  H. Reichert,et al.  Programmed cell death in type II neuroblast lineages is required for central complex development in the Drosophila brain , 2012, Neural Development.

[42]  Y. Jan,et al.  Ets transcription factor Pointed promotes the generation of intermediate neural progenitors in Drosophila larval brains , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  H. Horvitz,et al.  In vivo effects on intron retention and exon skipping by the U2AF large subunit and SF1/BBP in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. , 2011, RNA.

[44]  V. Hartenstein.  Morphological diversity and development of glia in Drosophila , 2011, Glia.

[45]  A. Giangrande,et al.  Multipotent neural stem cells generate glial cells of the central complex through transit amplifying intermediate progenitors in Drosophila brain development. , 2011, Developmental biology.

[46]  Anke Busch,et al.  Efficient internal exon recognition depends on near equal contributions from the 3′ and 5′ splice sites , 2011, Nucleic acids research.

[47]  C. Will,et al.  Spliceosome structure and function. , 2011, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[48]  Juergen A. Knoblich,et al.  Genome-Wide Analysis of Self-Renewal in Drosophila Neural Stem Cells by Transgenic RNAi , 2011, Cell stem cell.

[49]  N. Perrimon,et al.  A genome-scale shRNA resource for transgenic RNAi in Drosophila , 2011, Nature Methods.

[50]  Cheng-Yu Lee,et al.  Keeping neural progenitor cells on a short leash during Drosophila neurogenesis , 2011, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[51]  O. Gruss,et al.  The function of spliceosome components in open mitosis , 2010, Nucleus.

[52]  Omer Ali Bayraktar,et al.  Drosophila type II neuroblast lineages keep Prospero levels low to generate large clones that contribute to the adult brain central complex , 2010, Neural Development.

[53]  V. Hartenstein,et al.  The Drosophila neural lineages: a model system to study brain development and circuitry , 2010, Development Genes and Evolution.

[54]  C. Walsh,et al.  The exon junction complex component Magoh controls brain size by regulating neural stem cell division , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[55]  Aaron R. Quinlan,et al.  Bioinformatics Applications Note Genome Analysis Bedtools: a Flexible Suite of Utilities for Comparing Genomic Features , 2022 .

[56]  K. Golden,et al.  dFezf/Earmuff maintains the restricted developmental potential of intermediate neural progenitors in Drosophila. , 2010, Developmental cell.

[57]  T. Cooper,et al.  The pathobiology of splicing , 2010, The Journal of pathology.

[58]  Heinrich Reichert,et al.  Postembryonic development of transit amplifying neuroblast lineages in the Drosophila brain , 2009, Neural Development.

[59]  H. Handa,et al.  DSIF, the Paf1 complex, and Tat-SF1 have nonredundant, cooperative roles in RNA polymerase II elongation. , 2009, Genes & development.

[60]  Sean J Morrison,et al.  Mechanisms of stem cell self-renewal. , 2009, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[61]  Heather B. Miller,et al.  Tat-SF1 Is Not Required for Tat Transactivation but Does Regulate the Relative Levels of Unspliced and Spliced HIV-1 RNAs , 2009, PloS one.

[62]  Jian-Qun Chen,et al.  Patterns of exon-intron architecture variation of genes in eukaryotic genomes , 2009, BMC Genomics.

[63]  N. Tapon,et al.  Drosophila MFAP1 Is Required for Pre-mRNA Processing and G2/M Progression* , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[64]  Henning Urlaub,et al.  Conservation of the Protein Composition and Electron Microscopy Structure of Drosophila melanogaster and Human Spliceosomal Complexes , 2008, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[65]  M. Levine,et al.  A simplified miRNA-based gene silencing method for Drosophila melanogaster. , 2008, Developmental biology.

[66]  Chris Q Doe,et al.  Identification of Drosophila type II neuroblast lineages containing transit amplifying ganglion mother cells , 2008, Developmental neurobiology.

[67]  N. Barbosa-Morais,et al.  Tissue-specific splicing factor gene expression signatures , 2008, Nucleic acids research.

[68]  C. Doe.  Neural stem cells: balancing self-renewal with differentiation , 2008, Development.

[69]  S. Bowman,et al.  The tumor suppressors Brat and Numb regulate transit-amplifying neuroblast lineages in Drosophila. , 2008, Developmental cell.

[70]  J. Knoblich,et al.  Mechanisms of Asymmetric Stem Cell Division , 2008, Cell.

[71]  H. Reichert,et al.  Amplification of neural stem cell proliferation by intermediate progenitor cells in Drosophila brain development , 2008, Neural Development.

[72]  F. Rigo,et al.  Functional Coupling of Last-Intron Splicing and 3′-End Processing to Transcription In Vitro: the Poly(A) Signal Couples to Splicing before Committing to Cleavage , 2007, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[73]  Julie M. Sullivan,et al.  FlyMine: an integrated database for Drosophila and Anopheles genomics , 2007, Genome Biology.

[74]  M. Ares,et al.  Rearrangement of competing U2 RNA helices within the spliceosome promotes multiple steps in splicing. , 2007, Genes & development.

[75]  N. Sakabe,et al.  Sequence features responsible for intron retention in human , 2007, BMC Genomics.

[76]  Sean J. Morrison,et al.  Asymmetric and symmetric stem-cell divisions in development and cancer , 2006, Nature.

[77]  V. Hartenstein,et al.  Morphogenesis and proliferation of the larval brain glia in Drosophila. , 2005, Developmental biology.

[78]  B. Graveley,et al.  Identification of alternative splicing regulators by RNA interference in Drosophila. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[79]  G. Crooks,et al.  WebLogo: a sequence logo generator. , 2004, Genome research.

[80]  Noboru Jo Sakabe,et al.  Detection and evaluation of intron retention events in the human transcriptome. , 2004, RNA.

[81]  Daniel H. Geschwind,et al.  Cancerous stem cells can arise from pediatric brain tumors , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[82]  M. Ares,et al.  ATP requirement for Prp5p function is determined by Cus2p and the structure of U2 small nuclear RNA , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[83]  V. Hartenstein,et al.  Early development of the Drosophila brain: V. Pattern of postembryonic neuronal lineages expressing DE‐cadherin , 2003, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[84]  Steven P. Gygi,et al.  Comprehensive proteomic analysis of the human spliceosome , 2002, Nature.

[85]  T. Blumenthal.  Faculty Opinions recommendation of Removal of a single alpha-tubulin gene intron suppresses cell cycle arrest phenotypes of splicing factor mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2002 .

[86]  Tyson A. Clark,et al.  Removal of a Single α-Tubulin Gene Intron Suppresses Cell Cycle Arrest Phenotypes of Splicing Factor Mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2002, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[87]  Qiang Zhou,et al.  Stimulatory effect of splicing factors on transcriptional elongation , 2001, Nature.

[88]  C. Burge,et al.  A computational analysis of sequence features involved in recognition of short introns , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[89]  F. Baralle,et al.  Splicing of constitutive upstream introns is essential for the recognition of intra-exonic suboptimal splice sites in the thrombopoietin gene. , 2001, Nucleic acids research.

[90]  Stephen M. Mount,et al.  Pre-Messenger RNA Processing Factors in the Drosophila Genome , 2000, The Journal of cell biology.

[91]  I. Weissman,et al.  Stem Cells Units of Development, Units of Regeneration, and Units in Evolution , 2000, Cell.

[92]  M. Ares,et al.  ATP can be dispensable for prespliceosome formation in yeast. , 2000, Genes & development.

[93]  R. Roeder,et al.  A novel RNA polymerase II‐containing complex potentiates Tat‐enhanced HIV‐1 transcription , 1999, The EMBO journal.

[94]  Liqun Luo,et al.  Mosaic Analysis with a Repressible Cell Marker for Studies of Gene Function in Neuronal Morphogenesis , 1999, Neuron.

[95]  X. Y. Li,et al.  The HIV-1 Tat cellular coactivator Tat-SF1 is a general transcription elongation factor. , 1998, Genes & development.

[96]  M. Ares,et al.  CUS2, a Yeast Homolog of Human Tat-SF1, Rescues Function of Misfolded U2 through an Unusual RNA Recognition Motif , 1998, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[97]  T. P. Neufeld,et al.  Coordination of Growth and Cell Division in the Drosophila Wing , 1998, Cell.

[98]  David Haussler,et al.  Improved splice site detection in Genie , 1997, RECOMB '97.

[99]  P. Sharp,et al.  Tat-SF1: Cofactor for Stimulation of Transcriptional Elongation by HIV-1 Tat , 1996, Science.

[100]  Stephen M. Mount,et al.  Splicing signals in Drosophila: intron size, information content, and consensus sequences. , 1992, Nucleic acids research.

[101]  H. Reichert.  Drosophila neural stem cells: cell cycle control of self-renewal, differentiation, and termination in brain development. , 2011, Results and problems in cell differentiation.

[102]  C. Eberhart.  In search of the medulloblast: neural stem cells and embryonal brain tumors. , 2007, Neurosurgery clinics of North America.

[103]  Heather B. Miller,et al.  Identification of Tat-sf1 Cellular Targets by Exon Array Analysis Reveals Dual Roles in Transcription and Splicing , 2022 .