Ambiguity of Objective Image Quality Metrics: A New Methodology for Performance Evaluation

Objective image quality metrics try to estimate the perceptual quality of the given image by considering the characteristics of the human visual system. However, it is possible that the metrics produce different quality scores even for two images that are perceptually indistinguishable by human viewers, which have not been considered in the existing studies related to objective quality assessment. In this paper, we address the issue of ambiguity of objective image quality assessment. We propose an approach to obtain an ambiguity interval of an objective metric, within which the quality score difference is not perceptually significant. In particular, we use the visual difference predictor, which can consider viewing conditions that are important for visual quality perception. In order to demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed approach, we conduct experiments with 33 state-of-the-art image quality metrics in the viewpoint of their accuracy and ambiguity for three image quality databases. The results show that the ambiguity intervals can be applied as an additional figure of merit when conventional performance measurement does not determine superiority between the metrics. The effect of the viewing distance on the ambiguity interval is also shown.

[1]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Multiscale structural similarity for image quality assessment , 2003, The Thrity-Seventh Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers, 2003.

[2]  J. Astola,et al.  ON BETWEEN-COEFFICIENT CONTRAST MASKING OF DCT BASIS FUNCTIONS , 2007 .

[3]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Applications of Objective Image Quality Assessment Methods [Applications Corner] , 2011, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[4]  P. Alam ‘A’ , 2021, Composites Engineering: An A–Z Guide.

[5]  Karel Fliegel,et al.  On the accuracy of objective image and video quality models: New methodology for performance evaluation , 2016, 2016 Eighth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX).

[6]  Fan Zhang,et al.  Image Quality Assessment by Separately Evaluating Detail Losses and Additive Impairments , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[7]  Jong-Seok Lee Comparison of objective quality metrics on the scalable extension of H.264/AVC , 2012, 2012 19th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[8]  Jong-Seok Lee,et al.  Ambiguity-based evaluation of objective quality metrics for image compression , 2016, 2016 Eighth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX).

[9]  Ke Gu,et al.  No-Reference Quality Assessment of Screen Content Pictures , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[10]  Gary J. Sullivan,et al.  Overview of the High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) Standard , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[11]  Patrick Le Callet,et al.  HDR-VDP-2.2: a calibrated method for objective quality prediction of high-dynamic range and standard images , 2014, J. Electronic Imaging.

[12]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Applications of Objective Image Quality Assessment Methods , 2011 .

[13]  Weisi Lin,et al.  A Fast Reliable Image Quality Predictor by Fusing Micro- and Macro-Structures , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[14]  Nikolay N. Ponomarenko,et al.  A NEW FULL-REFERENCE QUALITY METRICS BASED ON HVS , 2006 .

[15]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[16]  Jon Y. Hardeberg,et al.  CID: IQ - A New Image Quality Database , 2014, ICISP.

[17]  Robert J. Safranek,et al.  Signal compression based on models of human perception , 1993, Proc. IEEE.

[18]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  A Statistical Evaluation of Recent Full Reference Image Quality Assessment Algorithms , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[19]  Gustavo de Veciana,et al.  An information fidelity criterion for image quality assessment using natural scene statistics , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[20]  David Zhang,et al.  FSIM: A Feature Similarity Index for Image Quality Assessment , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[21]  Hua Huang,et al.  No-reference image quality assessment based on spatial and spectral entropies , 2014, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[22]  Ajay Luthra,et al.  Overview of the H.264/AVC video coding standard , 2003, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol..

[23]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Gradient Magnitude Similarity Deviation: A Highly Efficient Perceptual Image Quality Index , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[24]  Eric C. Larson,et al.  Most apparent distortion: full-reference image quality assessment and the role of strategy , 2010, J. Electronic Imaging.

[25]  Gorjan Alagic,et al.  #p , 2019, Quantum information & computation.

[26]  Wolfgang Heidrich,et al.  HDR-VDP-2: a calibrated visual metric for visibility and quality predictions in all luminance conditions , 2011, SIGGRAPH 2011.

[27]  Manri Cheon,et al.  On ambiguity of objective image quality assessment , 2016 .

[28]  Martin Reisslein,et al.  Objective Video Quality Assessment Methods: A Classification, Review, and Performance Comparison , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[29]  Christophe Charrier,et al.  Blind Image Quality Assessment: A Natural Scene Statistics Approach in the DCT Domain , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[30]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Information Content Weighting for Perceptual Image Quality Assessment , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[31]  Weisi Lin,et al.  Image Quality Assessment Based on Gradient Similarity , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[32]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  The JPEG 2000 still image compression standard , 2001, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[33]  A. Bovik,et al.  A universal image quality index , 2002, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[34]  Olivier Déforges,et al.  A Benchmark of DIBR Synthesized View Quality Assessment Metrics on a New Database for Immersive Media Applications , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[35]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  Benchmarking of quality metrics on ultra-high definition video sequences , 2013, 2013 18th International Conference on Digital Signal Processing (DSP).

[36]  Weisi Lin,et al.  Analysis of Distortion Distribution for Pooling in Image Quality Prediction , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[37]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Image information and visual quality , 2006, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[38]  Wenjun Zhang,et al.  Quality Assessment Considering Viewing Distance and Image Resolution , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[39]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  RRED Indices: Reduced Reference Entropic Differencing for Image Quality Assessment , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[40]  Methods , metrics and procedures for statistical evaluation , qualification and comparison of objective quality prediction models , 2013 .

[41]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  Calculation of average coding efficiency based on subjective quality scores , 2014, Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation.

[42]  Gregory K. Wallace,et al.  The JPEG still picture compression standard , 1991, CACM.

[43]  Scott J. Daly,et al.  Visible differences predictor: an algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity , 1992, Electronic Imaging.

[44]  Weisi Lin,et al.  Perceptual visual quality metrics: A survey , 2011, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent..

[45]  Marco Carli,et al.  Modified image visual quality metrics for contrast change and mean shift accounting , 2011, 2011 11th International Conference The Experience of Designing and Application of CAD Systems in Microelectronics (CADSM).

[46]  Jong-Seok Lee,et al.  Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of Compressed 4K UHD Videos for Immersive Experience , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[47]  Qingjie Zhao,et al.  Blind image quality assessment by relative gradient statistics and adaboosting neural network , 2016, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[48]  Jong-Seok Lee,et al.  Evaluation of objective quality metrics for multidimensional video scalability , 2016, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent..

[49]  Jong-Seok Lee,et al.  On Designing Paired Comparison Experiments for Subjective Multimedia Quality Assessment , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[50]  Wilson S. Geisler,et al.  Image quality assessment based on a degradation model , 2000, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[51]  Hongyu Li,et al.  VSI: A Visual Saliency-Induced Index for Perceptual Image Quality Assessment , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[52]  Shahram Shirani,et al.  Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of Image: A Survey , 2014, ArXiv.

[53]  Sheila S. Hemami,et al.  VSNR: A Wavelet-Based Visual Signal-to-Noise Ratio for Natural Images , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.