Ecosystem photosynthesis in land-surface models: a first-principles approach

Vegetation regulates land-atmosphere water and energy exchanges and is an essential component of land-surface models (LSMs). However, LSMs have been handicapped by assumptions that equate acclimated photosynthetic responses to environment with fast responses observable in the laboratory. These time scales can be distinguished by including specific representations of acclimation, but at the cost of further increasing parameter requirements. Here we develop an alternative approach based on optimality principles that predict the acclimation of carboxylation and electron-transport capacities, and a variable controlling the response of leaf-level carbon dioxide drawdown to vapour pressure deficit (VPD), to variations in growth conditions on a weekly to monthly time scale. In the “P model”, an optimality-based light-use efficiency model for gross primary production (GPP) on this time scale, these acclimated responses are implicit. Here they are made explicit, allowing fast and slow response time-scales to be separated and GPP to be simulated at sub-daily timesteps. The resulting model mimics diurnal cycles of GPP recorded by eddy-covariance flux towers in a temperate grassland and boreal, temperate and tropical forests, with no parameter changes between biomes. Best performance is achieved when biochemical capacities are adjusted to match recent midday conditions. This model suggests a simple and parameter-sparse method to include both instantaneous and acclimated responses within an LSM framework, with many potential applications in weather, climate and carbon - cycle modelling. Plain Language Summary Vegetation regulates the exchanges of energy, water and carbon dioxide between the land and the atmosphere. Numerical climate models represent these processes, focusing mainly on their rapid variations in response to changes in the environment (including temperature and light) on timescales of seconds to hours. However, plants also adjust their physiology to environmental changes over longer periods within the season. Here we have adapted a simple model that formulates plant behaviour in terms of optimal trade-offs between different processes, so it simulates processes on both time scales. This model correctly reproduces the daily cycle of carbon dioxide uptake by plants, as recorded in different kinds of vegetation. We show that plants optimize their behaviour for midday conditions, when the light is greatest, and adjust to longer-term environmental variations on a timescale of about a week to a month. The model conveniently avoids the need to give specific, fixed values to physiological variables (such as photosynthetic capacity) for different types of plants. The optimality assumptions mean that the model gives equally good results in tropical, temperate and boreal forests, and in grasslands, using the same equations, and a very small number of input variables that are constant across the world. Key Points Optimality theory is used to develop a simple model incorporating fast and acclimated responses of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance Biogeochemical photosynthetic capacities adjust to midday light conditions The new model simulates gross primary production on sub-daily timesteps across a range of different vegetation types and climate

[1]  Seoung Bum Kim,et al.  Comparative Study on Exponentially Weighted Moving Average Approaches for the Self-Starting Forecasting , 2020, Applied Sciences.

[2]  T. Keenan,et al.  Global evidence for the acclimation of ecosystem photosynthesis to light , 2020, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[3]  Jonas Ardö,et al.  The FLUXNET2015 dataset and the ONEFlux processing pipeline for eddy covariance data , 2020, Scientific Data.

[4]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  Extending a first-principles primary production model to predict wheat yields , 2020, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology.

[5]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  Organizing principles for vegetation dynamics , 2020, Nature Plants.

[6]  Rosie A. Fisher,et al.  Perspectives on the Future of Land Surface Models and the Challenges of Representing Complex Terrestrial Systems , 2020, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[7]  I. Prentice,et al.  Components of leaf-trait variation along environmental gradients. , 2020, The New phytologist.

[8]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  Acclimation of leaf respiration consistent with optimal photosynthetic capacity , 2020, Global change biology.

[9]  Nathan Collier,et al.  The Community Land Model Version 5: Description of New Features, Benchmarking, and Impact of Forcing Uncertainty , 2019, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[10]  I. Prentice,et al.  Historical changes in the stomatal limitation of photosynthesis: empirical support for an optimality principle. , 2019, The New phytologist.

[11]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  P-model v1.0: an optimality-based light use efficiency model for simulating ecosystem gross primary production , 2019, Geoscientific Model Development.

[12]  Kim S. Ely,et al.  Terrestrial biosphere models may overestimate Arctic CO2 assimilation if they do not account for decreased quantum yield and convexity at low temperature. , 2019, The New phytologist.

[13]  T. McVicar,et al.  Coupled estimation of 500 m and 8-day resolution global evapotranspiration and gross primary production in 2002–2017 , 2019, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[14]  Michael Battaglia,et al.  Acclimation and adaptation components of the temperature dependence of plant photosynthesis at the global scale. , 2019, The New phytologist.

[15]  S. Zaehle,et al.  Land surface model photosynthesis and parameter calibration for boreal sites with adaptive population importance sampler , 2019 .

[16]  S. Zaehle,et al.  Supplementary material to "Land surface model photosynthesis and parameter calibration for boreal sites with adaptive population importance sampler" , 2019 .

[17]  Ü. Niinemets,et al.  Global photosynthetic capacity is optimized to the environment , 2019, Ecology letters.

[18]  M. Hutchinson,et al.  The validity of optimal leaf traits modelled on environmental conditions. , 2018, The New phytologist.

[19]  S. Prober,et al.  Thermal acclimation of leaf photosynthetic traits in an evergreen woodland, consistent with the coordination hypothesis , 2017, Biogeosciences.

[20]  C. Peng,et al.  Towards a universal model for carbon dioxide uptake by plants , 2017, Nature Plants.

[21]  F. Woodward,et al.  The impact of alternative trait-scaling hypotheses for the maximum photosynthetic carboxylation rate (Vcmax ) on global gross primary production. , 2017, The New phytologist.

[22]  Nilza Maria dos Reis Castro,et al.  Estimation of soil water content in watershed using artificial neural networks , 2017 .

[23]  G. Bonan,et al.  Biophysical consequences of photosynthetic temperature acclimation for climate , 2017 .

[24]  S. Manzoni,et al.  Modelling the influence of ectomycorrhizal decomposition on plant nutrition and soil carbon sequestration in boreal forest ecosystems. , 2017, The New phytologist.

[25]  R. Dunn,et al.  Stomatal acclimation to vapour pressure deficit doubles transpiration of small tree seedlings with warming. , 2016, Plant, cell & environment.

[26]  G. Bonan,et al.  Temperature acclimation of photosynthesis and respiration: A key uncertainty in the carbon cycle‐climate feedback , 2015 .

[27]  P. Ciais,et al.  Spatiotemporal patterns of terrestrial gross primary production: A review , 2015 .

[28]  Mark C. Vanderwel,et al.  Global convergence in leaf respiration from estimates of thermal acclimation across time and space. , 2015, The New phytologist.

[29]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  Optimal stomatal behaviour around the world , 2015 .

[30]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  Global variability in leaf respiration in relation to climate, plant functional types and leaf traits. , 2015, The New phytologist.

[31]  S. Palmroth,et al.  How eco-evolutionary principles can guide tree breeding and tree biotechnology for enhanced productivity. , 2014, Tree physiology.

[32]  I. Prentice,et al.  Reliable, robust and realistic: the three R's of next-generation land-surface modelling , 2014 .

[33]  S. Levin,et al.  Resource limitation in a competitive context determines complex plant responses to experimental resource additions. , 2013, Ecology.

[34]  P. Cox,et al.  Evaluating the Land and Ocean Components of the Global Carbon Cycle in the CMIP5 Earth System Models , 2013 .

[35]  Nicholas G Smith,et al.  Plant respiration and photosynthesis in global‐scale models: incorporating acclimation to temperature and CO2 , 2013, Global change biology.

[36]  Markus Reichstein,et al.  On the choice of the driving temperature for eddy-covariance carbon dioxide flux partitioning , 2012 .

[37]  Pierre Martre,et al.  The Coordination of Leaf Photosynthesis Links C and N Fluxes in C3 Plant Species , 2012, PloS one.

[38]  Ulf Dieckmann,et al.  Modeling carbon allocation in trees: a search for principles. , 2012, Tree physiology.

[39]  Paolo De Angelis,et al.  Reconciling the optimal and empirical approaches to modelling stomatal conductance , 2011 .

[40]  A. Arneth,et al.  Separation of net ecosystem exchange into assimilation and respiration using a light response curve approach: critical issues and global evaluation , 2010 .

[41]  Radim Mareš,et al.  New International Formulation for the Viscosity of H2O , 2009 .

[42]  F. Woodward,et al.  Using temperature‐dependent changes in leaf scaling relationships to quantitatively account for thermal acclimation of respiration in a coupled global climate–vegetation model , 2008 .

[43]  G. Bonan Forests and Climate Change: Forcings, Feedbacks, and the Climate Benefits of Forests , 2008, Science.

[44]  Jens Kattge,et al.  Temperature acclimation in a biochemical model of photosynthesis: a reanalysis of data from 36 species. , 2007, Plant, cell & environment.

[45]  K. Oleson,et al.  A dynamic global vegetation model for use with climate models: concepts and description of simulated vegetation dynamics , 2003 .

[46]  Carl J. Bernacchi,et al.  In vivo temperature response functions of parameters required to model RuBP-limited photosynthesis , 2003 .

[47]  P. Reich,et al.  Least‐Cost Input Mixtures of Water and Nitrogen for Photosynthesis , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[48]  Antonio Donato Nobre,et al.  Acclimation of photosynthetic capacity to irradiance in tree canopies in relation to leaf nitrogen concentration and leaf mass per unit area , 2002 .

[49]  E. Singsaas,et al.  Variation in measured values of photosynthetic quantum yield in ecophysiological studies , 2001, Oecologia.

[50]  Carl J. Bernacchi,et al.  Improved temperature response functions for models of Rubisco‐limited photosynthesis , 2001 .

[51]  L. Pogliani,et al.  On the barometric formula , 1997 .

[52]  I. Prentice,et al.  A general model for the light-use efficiency of primary production , 1996 .

[53]  J. Berry,et al.  A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species , 1980, Planta.

[54]  Emil L. Smith THE INFLUENCE OF LIGHT AND CARBON DIOXIDE ON PHOTOSYNTHESIS , 1937, The Journal of general physiology.

[55]  Stephen Sitch,et al.  A roadmap for improving the representation of photosynthesis in Earth system models. , 2017, The New phytologist.

[56]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  Balancing the costs of carbon gain and water transport: testing a new theoretical framework for plant functional ecology. , 2014, Ecology letters.

[57]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Carbon and Other Biogeochemical Cycles , 2014 .

[58]  I. Prentice,et al.  Dynamic Global Vegetation Models , 2013 .

[59]  G. Bonan,et al.  Effects of boreal forest vegetation on global climate , 1992, Nature.