Ultrasound Image Despeckling Using Stochastic Distance-Based BM3D

Ultrasound image despeckling is an important research field, since it can improve the interpretability of one of the main categories of medical imaging. Many techniques have been tried over the years for ultrasound despeckling, and more recently, a great deal of attention has been focused on patch-based methods, such as non-local means and block-matching collaborative filtering (BM3D). A common idea in these recent methods is the measure of distance between patches, originally proposed as the Euclidean distance, for filtering additive white Gaussian noise. In this paper, we derive new stochastic distances for the Fisher–Tippett distribution, based on well-known statistical divergences, and use them as patch distance measures in a modified version of the BM3D algorithm for despeckling log-compressed ultrasound images. State-of-the-art results in filtering simulated, synthetic, and real ultrasound images confirm the potential of the proposed approach.

[1]  Marc Lebrun,et al.  An Analysis and Implementation of the BM3D Image Denoising Method , 2012, Image Process. Line.

[2]  Florence Tupin,et al.  Iterative Weighted Maximum Likelihood Denoising With Probabilistic Patch-Based Weights , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[3]  Elsa D. Angelini,et al.  BM3D-based ultrasound image denoising via brushlet thresholding , 2015, 2015 IEEE 12th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI).

[4]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Modern Image Quality Assessment , 2006, Modern Image Quality Assessment.

[5]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Mean squared error: Love it or leave it? A new look at Signal Fidelity Measures , 2009, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[6]  H. Batatia,et al.  Robust level set for heart cavities detection in ultrasound images , 2005, Computers in Cardiology, 2005.

[7]  Luisa Verdoliva,et al.  A nonlocal approach for SAR image denoising , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[8]  Zhao Hongyu,et al.  SAR image despeckling based on improved non-local means algorithm , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Electromagnetics in Advanced Applications (ICEAA).

[9]  Ali M. Reza,et al.  An Ultrasound Image Despeckling Approach Based on Principle Component Analysis , 2014 .

[10]  J. Arendt Paper presented at the 10th Nordic-Baltic Conference on Biomedical Imaging: Field: A Program for Simulating Ultrasound Systems , 1996 .

[11]  Scott T. Acton,et al.  Ultrasound Despeckling Using an Adaptive Window Stochastic Approach , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Image Processing.

[12]  Christos P. Loizou,et al.  Despeckle Filtering for Ultrasound Imaging and Video, Volume II: Selected Applications, Second Edition , 2015, Despeckle Filtering for Ultrasound Imaging and Video, Volume II, Second Edition.

[13]  K. Boone,et al.  Effect of skin impedance on image quality and variability in electrical impedance tomography: a model study , 1996, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[14]  A. Tannenbaum,et al.  Despeckling of medical ultrasound images , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[15]  Luisa Verdoliva,et al.  A Nonlocal SAR Image Denoising Algorithm Based on LLMMSE Wavelet Shrinkage , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[16]  Victor S. Frost,et al.  A Model for Radar Images and Its Application to Adaptive Digital Filtering of Multiplicative Noise , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[17]  Yasser M. Kadah,et al.  Real-time speckle reduction and coherence enhancement in ultrasound imaging via nonlinear anisotropic diffusion , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  Göran Salomonsson,et al.  Image enhancement based on a nonlinear multiscale method , 1997, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[19]  Nelson D. A. Mascarenhas,et al.  Intensity SAR Image Denoising with Stochastic Distances Using Non-Local Means Filter , 2013 .

[20]  Xiaorong Gao,et al.  A novel multiscale nonlinear thresholding method for ultrasonic speckle suppressing , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[21]  Ali Shamsoddini,et al.  IMAGE TEXTURE PRESERVATION IN SPECKLE NOISE SUPPRESSION , 2010 .

[22]  Nelson D. A. Mascarenhas,et al.  Edge preserving wavelet speckle filtering , 2002, Proceedings Fifth IEEE Southwest Symposium on Image Analysis and Interpretation.

[23]  Jean-Michel Morel,et al.  A Review of Image Denoising Algorithms, with a New One , 2005, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[24]  Alessandro Foi,et al.  Image Denoising by Sparse 3-D Transform-Domain Collaborative Filtering , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[25]  Leandro Pardo,et al.  On the applications of divergence type measures in testing statistical hypotheses , 1994 .

[26]  Pierrick Coupé,et al.  Nonlocal Means-Based Speckle Filtering for Ultrasound Images , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[27]  Gregory G. Slabaugh,et al.  Information-Theoretic Feature Detection in Ultrasound Images , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[28]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Image Quality Assessment: From Error Measurement to Structural Similarity , 2004 .

[29]  Alexander A. Sawchuk,et al.  Adaptive Noise Smoothing Filter for Images with Signal-Dependent Noise , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[30]  Jong-Sen Lee,et al.  Speckle analysis and smoothing of synthetic aperture radar images , 1981 .

[31]  J. Jensen,et al.  Calculation of pressure fields from arbitrarily shaped, apodized, and excited ultrasound transducers , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[32]  Hamid R. Tizhoosh,et al.  EFIS—Evolving Fuzzy Image Segmentation , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[33]  Devis Tuia,et al.  Remote Sensing Image Processing. Synthesis Lectures on Image, Video, and Multimedia Processing. , 2011 .

[34]  Sugato Chakravarty,et al.  Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures , 1995 .

[35]  Antonio Fernando Catelli Infantosi,et al.  Breast ultrasound despeckling using anisotropic diffusion guided by texture descriptors. , 2014, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[36]  Alejandro César Frery,et al.  SAR Image Despeckling Algorithms using Stochastic Distances and Nonlocal Means , 2013, ArXiv.

[37]  Fabrizio Argenti,et al.  Speckle removal from SAR images in the undecimated wavelet domain , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[38]  A. Bovik,et al.  A universal image quality index , 2002, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[39]  T. Taxt,et al.  Restoration of medical ultrasound images using two-dimensional homomorphic deconvolution , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[40]  Corina da Costa Freitas,et al.  Speckle reduction in polarimetric SAR imagery with stochastic distances and nonlocal means , 2013, Pattern Recognit..

[41]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[42]  Renato J. Cintra,et al.  Hypothesis Testing in Speckled Data With Stochastic Distances , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[43]  G. Cloutier,et al.  A critical review and uniformized representation of statistical distributions modeling the ultrasound echo envelope. , 2010, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[44]  Pierrick Coupé,et al.  Bayesian non local means-based speckle filtering , 2008, 2008 5th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[45]  Scott T. Acton,et al.  Speckle reducing anisotropic diffusion , 2002, IEEE Trans. Image Process..