Subaerial river bank erosion processes and their interaction with other bank erosion mechanisms on the River Arrow, Warwickshire, UK

River bank erosion occurs primarily through a combination of three mechanisms: mass failure, fluvial entrainment, and subaerial weakening and weathering. Subaerial processes are often viewed as ‘preparatory’ processes, weakening the bank face prior to fluvial erosion. Within a river basin downstream process ‘domains’ occur, with subaerial processes dominating the upper reaches, fluvial erosion the middle, and mass failure the lower reaches of a river. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate that (a) subaerial processes may be underestimated as an erosive agent, and (b) process dominance has a temporal, as well as spatial, aspect.  Bank erosion on the River Arrow, Warwickshire, UK, was monitored for 16 months (December 1996 to March 1998) using erosion pins. Variations in the rate and aerial extent of erosion are considered with reference to meteorological data. Throughout the first 15 months all erosion recorded was subaerial, resulting in up to 181 mm a−1 of bank retreat, compared with 13 to 27 mm a−1 reported by previous researchers. While the role of subaerial processes as ‘preparatory’ is not contended, it is suggested that such processes can also be erosive.  The three bank erosion mechanisms operate at different levels of magnitude and frequency, and the River Arrow data demonstrate this. Thus the concept of process dominance has a temporal, as well as spatial aspect, particularly over the short time-periods often used for studying processes in the field. Perception of the relative efficacy of each erosive mechanism will therefore be influenced by the temporal scale at which the bank is considered. With the advent of global climate change, both these magnitude–frequency characteristics and the consequent interaction of bank erosion mechanisms may alter. It is therefore likely that recognition of this temporal aspect of process dominance will become increasingly important to studies of bank erosion processes. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  D. Lawler Temporal variability in streambank response to individual flow events: the River Arrow, Warwickshire, UK , 1994 .

[2]  William B. Krantz,et al.  Application of a Fully Predictive Model for Secondary Frost Heave , 1996 .

[3]  D. Lawler The measurement of river bank erosion and lateral channel change: A review , 1993 .

[4]  V. Meentemeyer,et al.  Soil moisture and texture controls of selected parameters of needle ice growth , 1981 .

[5]  J. Hooke Magnitude and distribution of rates of river bank erosion , 1980 .

[6]  C. Thorne,et al.  Stability of composite river banks , 1981 .

[7]  N. Arnell,et al.  Global warming, river flows and water resources , 1996 .

[8]  L. Edwards The effect of alternate freezing and thawing on aggregate stability and aggregate size distribution of some Prince Edward Island soils , 1991 .

[9]  L. Bull Magnitude and variation in the contribution of bank erosion to the suspended sediment load of the River Severn, UK , 1997 .

[10]  M. Kirkby,et al.  Hillslope Form and Process , 1972 .

[11]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  Relating stream‐bank erosion to in‐stream transport of suspended sediment , 1999 .

[12]  N. Casagli,et al.  Pore water pressure and streambank stability: results from a monitoring site on the Sieve River, Italy , 1999 .

[13]  R F Craig,et al.  SOIL MECHANICS. 5TH EDITION , 1992 .

[14]  P. Gleick,et al.  Sensitivity of streamflow in the Colorado Basin to climatic changes , 1991 .

[15]  Colin R. Thorne,et al.  Effects of vegetation on river bank erosion and stability , 1990 .

[16]  Ian P. Prosser,et al.  Bank erosion of an incised upland channel by subaerial processes: Tasmania, Australia , 2000 .

[17]  D. Gellens Impact of a CO2‐induced climatic change on river flow variability in three rivers in Belgium , 1991 .

[18]  J. L. Ternan,et al.  The impact of afforestation on stream bank erosion and channel form , 1983 .

[19]  M. Gordon Wolman,et al.  Factors Influencing Erosion of a Cohesive River Bank , 1959, American Journal of Science.

[20]  G. Leeks,et al.  Downstream change in river bank erosion rates in the Swale–Ouse system, northern England , 1999 .

[21]  N. Reynard,et al.  The effects of climate change due to global warming on river flows in Great Britain , 1996 .

[22]  A. Harvey Process interactions, temporal scales and the development of hillslope gully systems: Howgill Fells, northwest England , 1992 .

[23]  Damian Lawler,et al.  River bank erosion and the influence of frost: a statistical examination , 1986 .

[24]  N. Matsuoka Soil moisture variability in relation to diurnal frost heaving on Japanese high mountain slopes , 1996 .

[25]  J. H. Duijsings A sediment budget for a forested catchment in Luxembourg and its implications for channel development , 1987 .

[26]  M. Wolman,et al.  Magnitude and Frequency of Forces in Geomorphic Processes , 1960, The Journal of Geology.

[27]  D. Lawler Needle ice processes and sediment mobilization on river banks: the River Ilston, West Glamorgan, UK , 1993 .

[28]  J. Boelhouwers Environmental controls on soil frost activity in the Western Cape mountains, South Africa , 1998 .

[29]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change 1992 : the supplementary report to the IPCC scientific assessment , 1992 .

[30]  Denys Brunsden,et al.  Geomorphology and time , 1977 .

[31]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change : the IPCC scientific assessment , 1990 .

[32]  J. Hooke An analysis of the processes of river bank erosion , 1979 .

[33]  J. Kwadijk,et al.  Sensitivity of the river Rhine discharge to environmental change, a first tentative assessment , 1991 .

[34]  D. Lawler A New Technique for the Automatic Monitoring of Erosion and Deposition Rates , 1991 .