Analytical and Experimental Evaluation of Wake-Up Receivers Based Protocols

Achieving energy efficient wireless communication is the most pursued goal in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs), as energy consumption is typically a major barrier to long term applications. In recent years, ultra-low power Wake-up Receivers (WuRx) have emerged, enabling pure asynchronous wireless communication that eliminates energy waste due to idle listening. However, to achieve a significant increase of energy efficiency compared to traditional duty-cycling approaches, Medium Access Control (MAC) protocols exploiting WuRx must be carefully designed. Therefore, we propose an analytical framework to model MAC protocols, leveraging WuRx or not, which gives an important evaluation of power consumption, latency and reliability. This framework was used to both model a WuRx-based MAC protocol, and to model two other state-of-the art MAC protocols for WSNs not using WuRx. Experimental power consumption and latency measurements were conducted to validate the proposed framework and the MAC protocol leveraging WuRx. Analytical results show the convenience of using WuRx and quantify the benefits of this emerging technology. These results demonstrate that using WuRx achieves up to 135 times lower power consumption and up to 23 times lower latency compared to traditional approaches in typical low throughput WSNs applications.

[1]  Chien-Erh Weng,et al.  The performance evaluation of IEEE 802.11 DCF using Markov chain model for wireless LANs , 2016, Comput. Stand. Interfaces.

[2]  Olivier Berder,et al.  OPWUM: Opportunistic MAC Protocol Leveraging Wake-Up Receivers in WSNs , 2016, J. Sensors.

[3]  Lothar Thiele,et al.  Zippy: On-Demand Network Flooding , 2015, SenSys.

[4]  Sadok Bdiri,et al.  An ultra-low power wake up receiver with flip flops based address decoder , 2015, 2015 IEEE 12th International Multi-Conference on Systems, Signals & Devices (SSD15).

[5]  Yunhao Liu,et al.  Does Wireless Sensor Network Scale? A Measurement Study on GreenOrbs , 2013, IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst..

[6]  Takeshi Ikenaga,et al.  Radio-On-Demand Sensor and Actuator Networks (ROD-SAN): System Design and Field Trial , 2014, GLOBECOM 2014.

[7]  Berend Jan van der Zwaag,et al.  Evaluation of MAC Protocols with Wake-up Radio for Implantable Body Sensor Networks , 2014, MoWNet.

[8]  Michele Magno,et al.  An ultra low power high sensitivity wake-up radio receiver with addressing capability , 2014, 2014 IEEE 10th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob).

[9]  Sajal K. Das,et al.  A General Model for MAC Protocol Selection in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2015, Ad Hoc Networks.

[10]  Andreas Meier,et al.  Analyzing MAC protocols for low data-rate applications , 2010, TOSN.

[11]  Lang Tong,et al.  A dynamic queue protocol for multiaccess wireless networks with multipacket reception , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[12]  Steve Goddard,et al.  Cross-Layer Analysis of the End-to-End Delay Distribution in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2009, 2009 30th IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium.

[13]  Ilker Demirkol,et al.  Has Time Come to Switch From Duty-Cycled MAC Protocols to Wake-Up Radio for Wireless Sensor Networks? , 2016, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[14]  Lei Tang,et al.  PW-MAC: An energy-efficient predictive-wakeup MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks , 2011, 2011 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[15]  Michele Magno,et al.  Design, Implementation, and Performance Evaluation of a Flexible Low-Latency Nanowatt Wake-Up Radio Receiver , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[16]  Thomas Watteyne,et al.  Comparison between Preamble Sampling and Wake-Up Receivers in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2010, 2010 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference GLOBECOM 2010.

[17]  Guido Dolmans,et al.  Analytical Models for the Wake-Up Receiver Power Budget for Wireless Sensor Networks , 2009, GLOBECOM 2009 - 2009 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[18]  Qin Wang,et al.  A Realistic Energy Consumption Model for TSCH Networks , 2014, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[19]  Mehran Abolhasan,et al.  A general performance model for MAC layer cooperative retransmission contention protocols , 2013, 2013 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM).

[20]  Li Xiao,et al.  The Evolution of MAC Protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey , 2013, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[21]  Michele Magno,et al.  Beyond duty cycling: Wake-up radio with selective awakenings for long-lived wireless sensing systems , 2015, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM).

[22]  Arnaud Carer,et al.  New Software and Platforms - PowWow: Power Optimized Hardware and Software FrameWork for Wireless Motes , 2015 .

[23]  Olivier Berder,et al.  PowWow : Power Optimized Hardware/Software Framework for Wireless Motes , 2010, ARCS Workshops.

[24]  Ove Edfors,et al.  Performance Analysis and Energy Optimization of Wake-Up Receiver Schemes for Wireless Low-Power Applications , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[25]  Charles M. Grinstead,et al.  Introduction to probability , 1986, Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences.

[26]  Yacine Challal,et al.  Energy efficiency in wireless sensor networks: A top-down survey , 2014, Comput. Networks.