How Irish Political Parties are Using Social Networking Sites to Reach Generation Z: an Insight into a New Online Social Network in a Small Democracy

Political scientists have pointed to falling levels of participation, trust in institutions and party activism in modern democracies (Dalton, ). In many democracies political engagement with young voters has proven challenging. The worry is that potential first-time voters, if alienated from the political process, will disengage from it (Huggins, ). Fieldhouse et al. () discovered that in  Europe democracies voter turnout of those under  was almost % lower than amongst the general electorate, while in Ireland the gap was .%. Political party membership has declined in Ireland to just , (Weeks, : ). This suggests that only .% of the population are members of political parties. Yet, membership in other group activities, such as community groups and sectional groups, is increasing (Jordan and Maloney, ). According to Tolbert and McNeal (: ) evidence suggests ‘that changes in communication technology may play an important role in influencing electoral behavior’. In particular, the internet has been promoted as a channel through which the young may become politically mobilised (Baumgartner and Morris, : ). Here we examine the use of social networking sites in political communications in Ireland. Boyd and Ellison (: ) define such sites as:

[1]  V. Gueorguieva,et al.  Voters, MySpace, and YouTube: The Impact of Alternative Communication Channels on the Election Cycle and Beyond. , 2006 .

[2]  Richard D. Waters,et al.  Engaging stakeholders through social networking: How nonprofit organizations are using Facebook , 2009 .

[3]  Matthew Wall,et al.  Keeping Up with the Murphys? Candidate Cyber-campaigning in the 2007 Irish General Election , 2009 .

[4]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[5]  W. Bennett,et al.  A New Era of Minimal Effects? The Changing Foundations of Political Communication , 2008 .

[6]  Grant Jordan,et al.  Democracy and Interest Groups , 2007 .

[7]  David Stewart,et al.  Analyzing Focus Group Data , 2007 .

[8]  J. Palfrey,et al.  Born digital: understanding the first generation of digital natives , 2009, Choice Reviews Online.

[9]  Keith N. Hampton,et al.  Does the Internet Increase, Decrease, or Supplement Social Capital? , 2001 .

[10]  R. J. Hill.  Parties and the Party System , 1994 .

[11]  M. Gallagher.  Ireland: The Discreet Charm of PR‐STV , 2005 .

[12]  鄭宇庭.  行銷硏究 : Marketing research , 2009 .

[13]  Guy J. Golan,et al.  Intermedia Agenda Setting in Television, Advertising, and Blogs During the 2004 Election , 2008 .

[14]  Michael L. Kent,et al.  Building Dialogic Relationships through the World Wide Web. , 1998 .

[15]  D. Graber.  Processing Politics: Learning from Television in the Internet Age , 2001 .

[16]  Don Tapscott,et al.  Grown Up Digital: How the Net Generation is Changing Your World , 2008 .

[17]  D. Bortree,et al.  Dialogic strategies and outcomes: An analysis of environmental advocacy groups' Facebook profiles , 2009 .

[18]  Ruthann Weaver Lariscy,et al.  Candidates Make Good Friends: An Analysis of Candidates' Uses of Facebook , 2008 .

[19]  R. Dalton.  Democratic challenges, democratic choices : the erosion of political support in advanced industrial democracies , 2004 .

[20]  G. FitzGerald.  Reflections on the Irish state , 2003 .

[21]  Trent Seltzer,et al.  Another Piece of the Puzzle: Advancing Social Capital Theory by Examining the Effect of Political Party Relationship Quality on Political and Civic Participation , 2010 .

[22]  Patrick Dunleavy,et al.  The Electoral System , 1997 .

[23]  Yan Jin,et al.  Keeping up with the digital age: How the American Red Cross uses social media to build relationships , 2011 .

[24]  Sue Bennett,et al.  The 'digital natives' debate: A critical review of the evidence , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[25]  Henry E. Brady,et al.  Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics , 1996 .

[26]  Richard D. Waters.  The Use of Social Media by Nonprofit Organizations: An Examination from the Diffusion of Innovations Perspective , 2010 .

[27]  Allan Kornberg,et al.  Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies , 2005, Perspectives on Politics.

[28]  Jeffrey C. Neely,et al.  The Writing on the Wall: A Content Analysis of College Students' Facebook Groups for the 2008 Presidential Election , 2010 .

[29]  H. Bernard,et al.  Techniques to Identify Themes , 2003 .

[30]  M. Tranmer,et al.  Something about young people or something about elections? Electoral participation of young people in Europe: Evidence from a multilevel analysis of the European Social Survey , 2007 .

[31]  Caroline J. Tolbert,et al.  Unraveling the Effects of the Internet on Political Participation? , 2003 .

[32]  Trent Seltzer,et al.  Toward a Model of Political Organization–Public Relationships: Antecedent and Cultivation Strategy Influence on Citizens' Relationships with Political Parties , 2010 .

[33]  Steffen Dalsgaard,et al.  Facework on Facebook: The presentation of self in virtual life and its role in the US elections , 2008 .

[34]  Laurel S. Gleason,et al.  A New Era of Minimal Effects? A Response to Bennett and Iyengar , 2010 .

[35]  Edward F. McQuarrie,et al.  Focus Groups: Theory and Practice , 1991 .

[36]  Arthur Lupia,et al.  Views from Inside the Net: How Websites Affect Young Adults' Political Interest , 2005, The Journal of Politics.