Computerized Method for Automatic Evaluation of Lean Body Mass from PET/CT: Comparison with Predictive Equations

CT has become an established method for calculating body composition, but it requires data from the whole body, which are not typically obtained in routine PET/CT examinations. A computerized scheme that evaluates whole-body lean body mass (LBM) based on CT data from limited-whole-body coverage was developed. The LBM so obtained was compared with results from conventional predictive equations. Methods: LBM can be obtained automatically from limited-whole-body CT data by 3 means: quantification of body composition from CT images in the limited-whole-body scan, based on thresholding of CT attenuation; determination of the range of coverage based on a characteristic trend of changing composition across different levels and pattern recognition of specific features at strategic positions; and estimation of the LBM of the whole body on the basis of a predetermined relationship between proportion of fat mass and extent of coverage. This scheme was validated using 18 whole-body PET/CT examinations truncated at different lengths to emulate limited-whole-body data. LBM was also calculated using predictive equations that had been reported for use in SUV normalization. Results: LBM derived from limited-whole-body data using the proposed method correlated strongly with LBM derived from whole-body CT data, with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.991 (shorter coverage) to 0.998 (longer coverage) and SEMs of LBM ranging from 0.14 to 0.33 kg. These were more accurate than results from different predictive equations, which ranged in correlation coefficient from 0.635 to 0.970 and in SEM from 0.64 to 2.40 kg. Conclusion: LBM of the whole body could be automatically estimated from CT data of limited-whole-body coverage typically acquired in PET/CT examinations. This estimation allows more accurate and consistent quantification of metabolic activity of tumors based on LBM-normalized standardized uptake value.

[1]  J. Kehayias,et al.  The meaning and measurement of lean body mass. , 2009, Nutrition reviews.

[2]  R. Boellaard,et al.  Repeatability of 18F-FDG PET in a Multicenter Phase I Study of Patients with Advanced Gastrointestinal Malignancies , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[3]  L. Lönn,et al.  Whole-body adipose tissue analysis: comparison of MRI, CT and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. , 2009, The British journal of radiology.

[4]  A. Bosy-Westphal,et al.  Metabolically active components of fat‐free mass and resting energy expenditure in humans: recent lessons from imaging technologies , 2002, Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[5]  R L Wahl,et al.  Standardized uptake values of normal tissues at PET with 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose: variations with body weight and a method for correction. , 1993, Radiology.

[6]  R. Wahl,et al.  From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  Michael Hentschel,et al.  Lean body mass-based standardized uptake value, derived from a predictive equation, might be misleading in PET studies , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[8]  S B Heymsfield,et al.  Cadaver validation of skeletal muscle measurement by magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomography. , 1998, Journal of applied physiology.

[9]  Sören Mattsson,et al.  Development of methods for body composition studies , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  T. Turkington,et al.  A systematic review of the factors affecting accuracy of SUV measurements. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  R L Wahl,et al.  Reevaluation of the standardized uptake value for FDG: variations with body weight and methods for correction. , 1999, Radiology.

[12]  S A Jebb,et al.  Healthy percentage body fat ranges: an approach for developing guidelines based on body mass index. , 2000, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[13]  Jan Pruim,et al.  Visualisation and assessment of the protein synthesis rate of lung cancer using carbon-11 tyrosine and positron emission tomography , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[14]  M Alpsten,et al.  A multicompartment body composition technique based on computerized tomography. , 1994, International journal of obesity and related metabolic disorders : journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[15]  M. Elia,et al.  Comparative evaluation of body composition methods and predictions, and calculation of density and hydration fraction of fat-free mass, in obese women. , 1994, International journal of obesity and related metabolic disorders : journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[16]  A Cederblad,et al.  Determination of total adipose tissue and body fat in women by computed tomography, 40K, and tritium. , 1986, The American journal of physiology.

[17]  R Hume,et al.  Prediction of lean body mass from height and weight , 1966, Journal of clinical pathology.

[18]  W. P. T. James,et al.  Research on obesity. , 1977, Nutrition reviews.

[19]  P. Deurenberg,et al.  Body mass index as a measure of body fatness: age- and sex-specific prediction formulas , 1991, British Journal of Nutrition.

[20]  L. Sjöström,et al.  A computer-tomography based multicompartment body composition technique and anthropometric predictions of lean body mass, total and subcutaneous adipose tissue. , 1991, International journal of obesity.

[21]  R. Hustinx,et al.  Within-patient variability of (18)F-FDG: standardized uptake values in normal tissues. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.