Does diet influence ejaculate expenditure under experimentally altered risk of sperm competition in guppies?

[1]  J. Evans,et al.  Personality, sperm traits and a test for their combined dependence on male condition in guppies , 2022, Royal Society Open Science.

[2]  M. Magris,et al.  Trade-offs of strategic sperm adjustments and their consequences under phenotype–environment mismatches in guppies , 2020, Animal Behaviour.

[3]  M. Jennions,et al.  Shifts in Reproductive Investment in Response to Competitors Lower Male Reproductive Success , 2020, The American Naturalist.

[4]  G. Cardozo,et al.  Female sperm storage mediates post‐copulatory costs and benefits of ejaculate anticipatory plasticity in the guppy , 2020, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[5]  R. Billard,et al.  The Energetics of Fish Sperm Motility , 2020 .

[6]  A. Pilastro,et al.  Postcopulatory Sexual Selection , 2020, Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences.

[7]  R. Bonduriansky,et al.  Effects of condition and sperm competition risk on sperm allocation and storage in neriid flies , 2019, Behavioral Ecology.

[8]  A. Bretman,et al.  Divergent allocation of sperm and the seminal proteome along a competition gradient in Drosophila melanogaster , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Shinichi Nakagawa,et al.  Effects of nutrient limitation on sperm and seminal fluid: a systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2019, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[10]  P. Nicovich,et al.  Developmental diet irreversibly shapes male post‐copulatory traits in the neriid fly Telostylinus angusticollis , 2018, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[11]  L. Simmons,et al.  A competitive environment influences sperm production, but not testes tissue composition, in house mice , 2018, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[12]  A. Pilastro,et al.  Sperm priming response to perceived mating opportunities is reduced in male guppies with high baseline sperm production , 2018, Current zoology.

[13]  Per B. Brockhoff,et al.  lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models , 2017 .

[14]  T. Bilde,et al.  Male spiders reduce pre- and postmating sexual investment in response to sperm competition risk , 2017 .

[15]  Alyson J. Lumley,et al.  Experimental evolution reveals that sperm competition intensity selects for longer, more costly sperm , 2017, Evolution letters.

[16]  Md Moshiur Rahman,et al.  Sperm as moderators of environmentally induced paternal effects in a livebearing fish , 2017, Biology Letters.

[17]  A. Pilastro,et al.  Directional postcopulatory sexual selection is associated with female sperm storage in Trinidadian guppies , 2016, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[18]  J. Belote,et al.  How sexual selection can drive the evolution of costly sperm ornamentation , 2016, Nature.

[19]  Donald R. Powers,et al.  Size dependence in non-sperm ejaculate production is reflected in daily energy expenditure and resting metabolic rate , 2015, The Journal of Experimental Biology.

[20]  Md Moshiur Rahman,et al.  Genotype‐by‐environment interactions underlie the expression of pre‐ and post‐copulatory sexually selected traits in guppies , 2015, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[21]  Md Moshiur Rahman,et al.  Experimental reduction in dietary omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids depresses sperm competitiveness , 2014, Biology Letters.

[22]  J. Evans,et al.  The Expression of Pre- and Postcopulatory Sexually Selected Traits Reflects Levels of Dietary Stress in Guppies , 2014, PloS one.

[23]  M. Taylor,et al.  Polyandry in nature: a global analysis. , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[24]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[25]  J. Evans,et al.  The Effects of Perceived Mating Opportunities on Patterns of Reproductive Investment by Male Guppies , 2014, PloS one.

[26]  A. Pilastro,et al.  Pattern of inbreeding depression, condition dependence, and additive genetic variance in Trinidadian guppy ejaculate traits , 2013, Ecology and evolution.

[27]  Md Moshiur Rahman,et al.  Condition-dependent expression of pre- and postcopulatory sexual traits in guppies , 2013, Ecology and evolution.

[28]  J. Evans,et al.  Expression of pre-and postcopulatory traits under different dietary conditions in guppies , 2013 .

[29]  Chad C. Smith.  Opposing effects of sperm viability and velocity on the outcome of sperm competition , 2012 .

[30]  M. Jennions,et al.  Sexual selection and sperm quantity: meta‐analyses of strategic ejaculation , 2011, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[31]  J. delBarco‐Trillo.  Adjustment of sperm allocation under high risk of sperm competition across taxa: a meta‐analysis , 2011, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[32]  J. Godin,et al.  Sperm competition risk and mate choice in male Trinidadian guppies, Poecilia reticulata , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[33]  A. Pilastro,et al.  Sperm number and velocity affect sperm competition success in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata) , 2011, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[34]  G. Parker,et al.  Sperm competition and ejaculate economics , 2010, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[35]  A. Pilastro,et al.  Female presence influences sperm velocity in the guppy , 2009, Biology Letters.

[36]  P. Stockley,et al.  Male house mice do not adjust sperm allocation in response to odours from related or unrelated rivals , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[37]  J. Evans.  No evidence for sperm priming responses under varying sperm competition risk or intensity in guppies , 2009, Naturwissenschaften.

[38]  I. Ramnarine,et al.  Inter‐population variation in multiple paternity and reproductive skew in the guppy , 2008, Molecular ecology.

[39]  R. Ingermann,et al.  Development of a novel CASA system based on open source software for characterization of zebrafish sperm motility parameters. , 2007, Theriogenology.

[40]  J. Evans,et al.  Colourful male guppies produce faster and more viable sperm , 2006, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[41]  H. J. Alexander,et al.  Invasion success and genetic diversity of introduced populations of guppies Poecilia reticulata in Australia , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[42]  T. Day,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF SPERM‐ALLOCATION STRATEGIES AND THE DEGREE OF SPERM COMPETITION , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[43]  J. L. Tomkins,et al.  Genic capture and resolving the lek paradox. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[44]  R. Montgomerie,et al.  Sperm swimming speed and energetics vary with sperm competition risk in bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[45]  C. Bozynski,et al.  The effect of female presence on spermiation, and of male sexual activity on ‘ready’ sperm in the male guppy , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[46]  R. Montgomerie,et al.  Mate preferences by male guppies (Poecilia reticulata) in relation to the risk of sperm competition , 2003, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[47]  A. Pilastro,et al.  Individual adjustment of sperm expenditure accords with sperm competition theory , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  D. Levitan.  Sperm velocity and longevity trade off each other and influence fertilization in the sea urchin Lytechinus variegatus , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[49]  A. Magurran,et al.  Male mating behaviour and sperm production characteristics under varying sperm competition risk in guppies , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[50]  A. Pilastro,et al.  Insemination efficiency of two alternative male mating tactics in the guppy Poecilia reticulata , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[51]  G. Parker,et al.  Sperm competition games: a prospective analysis of risk assessment , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[52]  A. Magurran,et al.  Male display rate reveals ejaculate characteristics in the Trinidadian guppy, Poecilia reticulata. , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[53]  G. Parker,et al.  Sperm competition games: individual assessment of sperm competition intensity by group spawners , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[54]  L. Rowe,et al.  The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[55]  P. Cornelius,et al.  Approximate F-tests of multiple degree of freedom hypotheses in generalized least squares analyses of unbalanced split-plot experiments , 1996 .

[56]  G. Parker,et al.  SPERM COMPETITION AND ITS EVOLUTIONARY CONSEQUENCES IN THE INSECTS , 1970 .

[57]  A. Escaffre,et al.  LA SPERMATOGENÈSE DE POECILIA RETICULATA. I. — ESTIMATION DU NOMBRE DE GÉNÉRATIONS GONIALES ET RENDEMENT DE LA SPERMATOGENÈSE , 1969 .