Participatory Action Research in Affordable Housing Partnerships: Collaborative Rationality, or Sleeping with the Growth Machine?

Abstract Participatory Action Research (PAR) emphasizes working with communities to develop questions that are relevant to their needs, then co-generating research to answer these questions. Typically, PAR focuses on empowering marginalized communities. Transforming Housing is a community–university collaborative partnership based in Melbourne Australia, with researchers asking developers, government, investors and community housing providers what they need to know in order to provide more and better affordable housing, then collectively generating ideas. After three years, this article takes a reflective practice lens to examine both possibilities and pitfalls arising from PAR with the rich and powerful. The article concludes that collaborate research on affordable housing can lead to outcomes intellectually honest, sustainable beyond political cycles and capable of effecting positive change at both the local and the metropolitan scales. However, this form of collaborative research can be easily derailed by politics, and does not address underlying structural inequalities.

[1]  Diana MacCallum,et al.  Planning with complexity: An introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy , 2012 .

[2]  Bill Randolph.  Wither Urban Research? Yes, You Read it Right First Time! , 2013 .

[3]  I. Young.  Justice and the Politics of Difference , 1990, The New Social Theory Reader.

[4]  Louis Albrechts,et al.  More of the Same is Not Enough! How Could Strategic Spatial Planning Be Instrumental in Dealing with the Challenges Ahead? , 2010 .

[5]  Joe Hurley,et al.  “Not a Lot of People Read the Stuff”: Australian Urban Research in Planning Practice , 2016 .

[6]  H. Molotch.  The City as a Growth Machine: Toward a Political Economy of Place , 1976, American Journal of Sociology.

[7]  B. Cooke,et al.  Participation: the New Tyranny? , 2001 .

[8]  G. Macleod.  Urban Politics Reconsidered , 2011 .

[9]  Takemi Sugiyama,et al.  Translating active living research into policy and practice: One important pathway to chronic disease prevention , 2015, Journal of public health policy.

[10]  Teija Vainio,et al.  Motivations, Results and the Role of Technology in Participatory Design Research during 2000’s – a Review in the Field of Architecture and Urban Planning , 2016 .

[11]  Patsy Healey,et al.  The deliberative practitioner: Encouraging participatory planning processes. , 2001 .

[12]  Onisimo Mutanga,et al.  How to build science-action partnerships for local land-use planning and management: lessons from Durban, South Africa , 2016 .

[13]  Mary M. Somerville,et al.  A comparative study of two design charrettes: implications for codesign and participatory action research , 2014 .

[14]  B. Flyvbjerg,et al.  Megaprojects and Risk , 2003 .

[15]  Carolyn Whitzman.  Reinventing planning education , 2009 .

[16]  M. Joseph Sirgy,et al.  Community Quality-of-Life Indicators: Best Cases IV , 2009 .

[17]  Daniel L. Childers,et al.  Advancing urban sustainability theory and action: Challenges and opportunities , 2014 .

[18]  R. Pain,et al.  Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods: Connecting People, Participation and Place , 2007 .

[19]  Graham Haughton,et al.  Post‐political spatial planning in England: a crisis of consensus? , 2012 .

[20]  Na Phelps,et al.  Planning with complexity: an introduction for collaborative rationality for public policy , 2011 .

[21]  Carolyn Whitzman,et al.  Partnerships for women’s safety in the city: “four legs for a good table” , 2014 .

[22]  Rachel Kallus,et al.  Citizenship in action: participatory urban visualization in contested urban space , 2016 .

[23]  Kate Shaw.  Public housing estate redevelopments in Australian inner cities and the role of social mix , 2013 .

[24]  Yvonne Rydin,et al.  Re-Examining the Role of Knowledge Within Planning Theory , 2007 .

[25]  Trevor Budge,et al.  Educating planners, educating for planning or planning education: The never‐ending story , 2009 .

[26]  Tiina Suopajärvi,et al.  Knowledge-making on ‘ageing in a smart city’ as socio-material power dynamics of participatory action research , 2017 .

[27]  Angela Hart,et al.  Developing local ‘communities of practice’ through local community – university partnerships , 2006 .

[28]  Cho Jungah,et al.  Justice and the Politics of Difference , 1997 .

[29]  P. Troy.  Australian Urban Research and Planning , 2013 .

[30]  P. Healey.  Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies , 1997 .

[31]  B. Cooke,et al.  Power, knowledge and social control in participatory development. , 2001 .

[32]  Meg Holden.  Getting to Groundbreaking, but not Build Out: From Formation to Failure in a Regional Housing Indicators Collaborative , 2017 .

[33]  Luca Bertolini,et al.  An Experiential Approach to Research in Planning , 2010 .

[34]  Frank Nevens,et al.  Urban Transition Labs: co-creating transformative action for sustainable cities , 2013 .

[35]  Alan Finkel,et al.  Perspective: Powering up citations , 2014, Nature.

[36]  Crystal Legacy,et al.  Achieving Legitimacy Through Deliberative Plan-Making Processes—Lessons for Metropolitan Strategic Planning , 2012 .

[37]  Carolyn Whitzman,et al.  Partnerships for disability-inclusive road development in Papua New Guinea: Unusual suspects and equivocal gains , 2015 .