Lights, Camera, Action: Using animations to co-evaluate user experience scenarios

Scenarios are considered a useful tool for designers and HCI communities to generate detailed problem descriptions, future predictions, concept generations, requirements analysis and detailed system design surrounding a design problem. However, little is known about animated scenarios as a tool to co-evaluate and further explore early user research insights and themes with end users. In this study, previous research findings and insights concerning emergency alarm pendants were designed and presented as animated scenarios to older participants in a workshop. Emergency alarms are wearable product technologies that allow the user to alert designated contacts in the event of falls or medical emergencies and were chosen as a case study for this paper. The findings indicate, that while the animated scenarios provide a basis for participants to describe problems associated with using the emergency alarm technology, participants also used the animated scenarios to discus and evaluate the key emotions and themes that were presented. We refer to this process as co-evaluate. It is argued that animated scenarios can be used to validate the HCI designers' understanding and interpretation of early user research insights and themes.

[1]  Leon Sterling,et al.  Emotion-led modelling for people-oriented requirements engineering: The case study of emergency systems , 2015, J. Syst. Softw..

[2]  Susan Turner,et al.  Is stereotyping inevitable when designing with personas , 2011 .

[3]  L. Sterling,et al.  Don't leave me untouched: Considering emotions in personal alarm use and development , 2014 .

[4]  Leon Sterling,et al.  One size doesn't fit all: diversifying "the user" using personas and emotional scenarios , 2014, SSE@SIGSOFT FSE.

[5]  Ben Matthews,et al.  Analysing conversation: Studying design as social action , 2012 .

[6]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[7]  Giulio Jacucci,et al.  Imagining and experiencing in design, the role of performances , 2002, NordiCHI '02.

[8]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Usability Engineering: Scenario-based Development of Human-Computer Interaction , 2001 .

[9]  Tim Mansfield,et al.  Moving bodies, social selves: movement-oriented personas and scenarios , 2005, OZCHI.

[10]  Jeremy P. Birnholtz,et al.  Independence and interaction: understanding seniors' privacy and awareness needs for aging in place , 2010, CHI.

[11]  Keiichi Sato,et al.  Describing multiple aspects of use situation: applications of Design Information Framework (DIF) to scenario development , 2006 .

[12]  Ronald Baecker,et al.  Using participatory activities with seniors to critique, build, and evaluate mobile phones , 2007, Assets '07.

[13]  Heeyoung Park,et al.  New technology and old habits: The role of age as a technology chasm. , 2006, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.