Distribution Analysis of the Variation of B-Factors of X-ray Crystal Structures: Temperature and Structural Variations in Lysozyme

The B-factor (isotropic temperature factor) data for X-ray structures of hen egg-white lysozyme from the study of Young et al. (Young, Dewan, Nave, and Tilton J. Appl. Cryst. 1993, 26, 309-319) potentially contain information about the relative contributions of static and dynamic variation to these factors. The six structures of the protein were obtained at two widely different temperatures (100 and 298 K), with two crystal forms (monoclinic and tetragonal) and other experimental differences. In addition, the monoclinic lysozyme crystals with two molecules per asymmetric unit allow direct examination of variation between structures determined under identical conditions at both temperatures. The B-factors from these structures all have complex distribution functions as might be expected considering all of the influences that these values must reflect. The empirical cumulative distribution functions (eCDF's) of these data show that they are representative of complex, multicomponent distributions. Distribution analysis using the DANFIP procedure (Wampler, Anal. Biochemistry 1990, 186, 209-218) of the data sets reveals that they can be modeled as four to six Gaussian subpopulations, that these subpopulations do not correlate with specific atom types, specific amino acid residues or fixed locations in the structure. While they do seem to correlate with localized groupings of atoms, these grouping vary from structure to structure even within the same crystal under the same conditions. Temperature seems to have a global effect in this case, but it is clear that other factors including experimental error influence the distribution of B-factors within a given structure. This analysis also helps explain the oft observed lack of atomic level correlation between experimental B-factors and calculated mean square displacements from molecular dynamics simulations.

[1]  Pertseva Mn,et al.  Thermal expansion of a protein. , 1987 .

[2]  R M Stroud,et al.  Significance of structural changes in proteins: Expected errors in refined protein structures , 1995, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[3]  Alan E. Mark,et al.  Computer simulation of protein motion , 1995 .

[4]  A. Mark,et al.  Fluctuation and cross-correlation analysis of protein motions observed in nanosecond molecular dynamics simulations. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[5]  J E Wampler,et al.  Cytoplasmic pH of Dictyostelium discoideum amebae during early development: identification of two cell subpopulations before the aggregation stage , 1990, The Journal of cell biology.

[6]  J E Wampler,et al.  Analysis of the probability distribution of small random samples by nonlinear fitting of integrated probabilities. , 1990, Analytical biochemistry.

[7]  and David M. LeMaster,et al.  Dynamical Mapping of E. coli Thioredoxin via 13C NMR Relaxation Analysis , 1996 .

[8]  G. Petsko,et al.  Effects of temperature on protein structure and dynamics: X-ray crystallographic studies of the protein ribonuclease-A at nine different temperatures from 98 to 320 K. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[9]  M. James,et al.  Crystal and molecular structure of the serine proteinase inhibitor CI-2 from barley seeds. , 1988, Biochemistry.

[10]  K. Constantine,et al.  Characterization of the backbone dynamics of an anti‐digoxin antibody VL domain by inverse detected 1H–15N NMR: Comparisons with X‐ray data for the Fab , 1993, Proteins.

[11]  Robert M. Stroud,et al.  The accuracy of refined protein structures: comparison of two independently refined models of bovine trypsin , 1978 .

[12]  R A Sayle,et al.  RASMOL: biomolecular graphics for all. , 1995, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[13]  O. Ptitsyn,et al.  How the molten globule became. , 1995, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[14]  G A Petsko,et al.  Fluctuations in protein structure from X-ray diffraction. , 1984, Annual review of biophysics and bioengineering.