Comparison of water–gas shift reaction activity and long-term stability of nanostructured CuO-CeO2 catalysts prepared by hard template and co-precipitation methods

Abstract This study focuses on the characterization and water–gas shift reaction (WGSR) activity of CuO-CeO 2 catalysts containing 10, 15 and 20 mol% CuO synthesized by hard template method (HT) with KIT-6 silica acting as a template and co-precipitation method (CP). The obtained solids were characterized by SEM/TEM microscopy, N 2 adsorption/desorption, XRD, H 2 -TPR/TPD, N 2 O decomposition and NH 3 chemisorption/TPD methods. The preparation techniques yield fundamentally different products despite the same nominal chemical composition. Catalysts prepared by the HT method exhibited ordered mesoporous structure, which was identified as the negative replica of the KIT-6 silica pore system. Considerable differences in BET surface area (147–166 m 2 /g for CuCe HT samples compared to 22–54 m 2 /g for CuCe CP solids, respectively) were measured. CuO dispersion values between 28% and 40% were determined for CuCe HT solids, in case of CuCe CP samples, these values were in the range of 8–20%. H 2 -TPR/TPD experiments revealed facile and extensive CeO 2 reduction in all tested samples, which increased with CuO loading. Very similar density of surface acidic sites was determined for both CuCe HT and CuCe CP catalyst samples at each CuO loading, with CuCe CP solids exhibiting the absence of strong acidic sites. WGS reaction activity was tested at the stoichiometric CO/H 2 O ratio and low contact times in the temperature range from 250 to 450 °C. Despite rigorous reaction conditions, CO conversions up to 62% and 54% were attained for CuCe HT and CuCe CP samples, respectively, with H 2 selectivity above 99% over the entire temperature range. Superior BET surface area and CuO dispersion of CuCe HT samples are decisive factors contributing to higher activity in the investigated WGS reaction, compared to the ones synthesized by the co-precipitation method.

[1]  R. Pirone,et al.  On the role of redox properties of CuO/CeO2 catalysts in the preferential oxidation of CO in H2-rich gases , 2008 .

[2]  J. Hanson,et al.  Comparative study on redox properties of nanosized CeO2 and CuO/CeO2 under CO/O2 , 2006 .

[3]  J. Lercher,et al.  Infrared studies of the surface acidity of oxides and zeolites using adsorbed probe molecules , 1996 .

[4]  T. Johannessen,et al.  An improved N2O-method for measuring Cu-dispersion , 2004 .

[5]  G. Avgouropoulos,et al.  Selective CO oxidation over CuO-CeO2 catalysts prepared via the urea-nitrate combustion method , 2003 .

[6]  R. Friedman,et al.  Determination of Metal Dispersion and Surface Composition in Supported Cu–Pt Catalysts , 2002 .

[7]  A. Pintar,et al.  Nanostructured Cu(x)Ce1-xO2-y mixed oxide catalysts: characterization and WGS activity tests. , 2007, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[8]  M. S. Hegde,et al.  Structural Investigation of Combustion Synthesized Cu/CeO2 Catalysts by EXAFS and Other Physical Techniques: Formation of a Ce1-xCuxO2-δ Solid Solution , 2002 .

[9]  Bozhi Tian,et al.  Nanostructured metal oxides synthesized by hard template method for gas sensing applications , 2005 .

[10]  De Chen,et al.  Nanocrystalline Cu-Ce-Zr mixed oxide catalysts for water-gas shift: Carbon nanofibers as dispersing agent for the mixed oxide particles , 2007 .

[11]  J. Levec,et al.  Effect of structural and acidity/basicity changes of CuO–CeO2 catalysts on their activity for water–gas shift reaction , 2008 .

[12]  J. Papavasiliou,et al.  Effect of dopants on the performance of CuO–CeO2 catalysts in methanol steam reforming , 2007 .

[13]  F. Kleitz,et al.  Design of Mesoporous Silica at Low Acid Concentrations in Triblock Copolymer-Butanol-Water Systems , 2005 .

[14]  F. Kleitz,et al.  Facile synthesis of high quality mesoporous SBA-15 with enhanced control of the porous network connectivity and wall thickness. , 2003, Chemical communications.

[15]  D. Zhao,et al.  Fast preparation of highly ordered nonsiliceous mesoporous materials via mixed inorganic precursors. , 2002, Chemical communications.

[16]  F. Kleitz,et al.  Hard templating pathways for the synthesis of nanostructured porous Co₃O₄ , 2007 .

[17]  Wuzong Zhou,et al.  Preparation of three-dimensional chromium oxide porous single crystals templated by SBA-15. , 2003, Chemical communications.

[18]  A. Ghenciu,et al.  Review of fuel processing catalysts for hydrogen production in PEM fuel cell systems , 2002 .

[19]  A. Martínez-Arias,et al.  Preferential oxidation of CO in rich H2 over CuO/CeO2: Details of selectivity and deactivation under the reactant stream , 2006 .

[20]  R. Ryoo,et al.  Synthesis of thermally stable mesoporous cerium oxide with nanocrystalline frameworks using mesoporous silica templates. , 2003, Chemical communications.

[21]  M. Flytzani-Stephanopoulos,et al.  Total Oxidation of Carbon Monoxide and Methane over Transition Metal Fluorite Oxide Composite Catalysts: I. Catalyst Composition and Activity , 1995 .

[22]  Tae-Wan Kim,et al.  MCM-48-like large mesoporous silicas with tailored pore structure: facile synthesis domain in a ternary triblock copolymer-butanol-water system. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[23]  Y. Zhu,et al.  Mesoporous CeO2 and CuO-loaded mesoporous CeO2: Synthesis, characterization, and CO catalytic oxidation property , 2005, Microporous and Mesoporous Materials.

[24]  J. Fierro,et al.  New catalytic routes for syngas and hydrogen production , 1996 .

[25]  P. Midgley,et al.  Structure−Activity Relationship in Nanostructured Copper−Ceria-Based Preferential CO Oxidation Catalysts , 2007 .

[26]  Qiuming Gao,et al.  Preparation of mesoporous copper cerium bimetal oxides with high performance for catalytic oxidation of carbon monoxide , 2008 .

[27]  M. A. Hasan,et al.  In situ FTIR spectra of pyridine adsorbed on SiO2-Al2O3, TiO2, ZrO2 and CeO2: general considerations for the identification of acid sites on surfaces of finely divided metal oxides , 2001 .

[28]  M. Engelhard,et al.  Effects of nanocrystalline CeO2 supports on the properties and performance of Ni–Rh bimetallic catalyst for oxidative steam reforming of ethanol , 2006 .

[29]  Henrik Kušar,et al.  Kinetics of the water–gas shift reaction over nanostructured copper–ceria catalysts , 2006 .

[30]  A. Pintar,et al.  Calcination temperature and CuO loading dependence on CuO-CeO2 catalyst activity for water-gas shift reaction , 2008 .

[31]  A. Pintar,et al.  TPR, TPO, and TPD examinations of Cu0.15Ce0.85O(2-y) mixed oxides prepared by co-precipitation, by the sol-gel peroxide route, and by citric acid-assisted synthesis. , 2005, Journal of colloid and interface science.