The effect of context on the processing of type-shifting verbs.

Recent research in lexical semantics has suggested that verbs such as begin and enjoy semantically select for a complement that denotes an activity or an event. When no such activity or event is specified in the form of a progressive or infinitival complement, as in John began (to read/reading) the book, the verb is said to "coerce" the NP direct object to shift its role to encompass the activity that begin requires as complement (e.g., writing, reading). Empirical support for this view has been provided by McElree, Traxler, Pickering, Seely, & Jackendoff (2001). In the present study, however, in two self-paced reading experiments, type-shifting effects (taken to be longer reading times engendered by the computation of the coercion process) were not obtained with sentences in isolation (Experiment 1) or with sentences embedded in contexts that specified the nature of the activity performed over the complement NP (Experiment 2). It is argued that type-shifting verbs are similar to non-preferred verbs for given contexts and that type-shifting operations are pragmatic inferences computed over underspecified semantic representations.

[1]  Martin J. Pickering,et al.  Coercion in sentence processing: evidence from eye-movements and self-paced reading , 2002 .

[2]  Matthew Flatt,et al.  PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .

[3]  Sally Rice,et al.  Unlikely Lexical Entries , 1988 .

[4]  Gary Libben,et al.  Semantic Transparency in the Processing of Compounds: Consequences for Representation, Processing, and Impairment , 1998, Brain and Language.

[5]  Alex Lascarides,et al.  Pragmatics and word meaning , 1998, Journal of Linguistics.

[6]  Brian McElree,et al.  Reading time evidence for enriched composition , 2001, Cognition.

[7]  M M Piñango,et al.  Real-Time Processing Implications of Enriched Composition at the Syntax–Semantics Interface , 1999, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[8]  J. Fodor,et al.  Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong , 1998 .

[9]  Roberto G. De Almeida,et al.  THE REPRESENTATION OF LEXICAL CONCEPTS: A PSYCHOLINGUISTIC INQUIRY , 1999 .

[10]  J. Fodor,et al.  The emptiness of the lexicon: Critical reflections on J. Pustejovsky's the generative lexicon , 1998 .

[11]  George Lakoff,et al.  Toward Generative Semantics , 1963 .

[12]  J. Fodor,et al.  The structure of a semantic theory , 1963 .

[13]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  The Architecture of the Language Faculty , 1996 .

[14]  James Pustejovsky,et al.  The Generative Lexicon , 1995, CL.

[15]  Jean-Pierre Koenig,et al.  Lexical Encoding of Event Participant Information , 1999, Brain and Language.

[16]  Milton Stephen Seegmiller,et al.  Lexical insertion in a transformational grammar , 1983 .