On the Status of Stems in Morphological Theory

1 Introduction To a first approximation, languages show two different types of morphological alternation, with 'alternation' construed in a broad sense. One type is concatenative, involving what looks like the affixation of one piece to another; e.g. kick/kick-ed. Another type of alternation involves morphophonological alternations of the type seen in sing/sang. One of the primary tasks of morphological theory is to provide an analysis of such alternations, and to situate them with respect to other parts of the grammar, especially syntax and phonology. Here we examine alternations that have been used in arguments that grammar must contain the 'stem' as a privileged object. We argue that that the move to stems is both unmotivated and problematic, points that we illustrate in a number of case studies, including a discussion of the verbal morphology of Classical Latin. (forthcoming)) advances a piece-based view of word formation, in which the syntax/morphology interface is as transparent as possible. Distributed Morphology posits that there are two types of primitive elements in the grammar that serve as the terminals of the syntactic derivation, and, accordingly, as the primitives of word formation. These two types of terminals correspond to the standard distinction between functional and lexical categories (for more details on the view adopted here see Embick and Halle (forthcoming)): * Aspects of our analysis of the Latin conjugation were presented at Going Romance 2003, and we would like to thank both the organizers of the conference and the conference participants. For comments on a draft version of the material presented here we are indebted to

[1]  Alec Marantz,et al.  Cognitive neuroscience and the English past tense: Comments on the paper by Ullman et al. , 2005, Brain and Language.

[2]  Bruce Hayes,et al.  Modeling English Past Tense Intuitions with Minimal Generalization , 2002, SIGMORPHON.

[3]  Rolf Noyer,et al.  Movement Operations after Syntax , 2001, Linguistic Inquiry.

[4]  Gregory Stump,et al.  Inflectional Morphology: Conclusions, extensions, and alternatives , 2001 .

[5]  M. Halle.  Distributed Morphology: Impoverishment and Fission , 2000 .

[6]  D. Embick,et al.  Features, Syntax, and Categories in the Latin Perfect , 2000, Linguistic Inquiry.

[7]  Gunlög Josefsson,et al.  Head of a word , 1998 .

[8]  Robert E. Beard.  Lexeme-morpheme base morphology : a general theory of inflection and word formation , 1996 .

[9]  Richard Wiese,et al.  The Phonology of German , 1996 .

[10]  A. Carstairs-McCarthy.  Inflection classes, gender, and the principle of contrast , 1994 .

[11]  M. Aronoff.  Morphology by Itself: Stems and Inflectional Classes , 1993 .

[12]  S. Anderson,et al.  Where's Morphology? , 1992 .

[13]  P. Matthews.  Inflectional Morphology: A Theoretical Study Based on Aspects of Latin Verb Conjugation , 1972 .

[14]  Artemis Alexiadou,et al.  Functional structure in nominals , 2001 .

[15]  Karlos Arregi,et al.  How the Spanish Verb Works , 2000 .

[16]  Charles D. Yang,et al.  Knowledge and learning in natural language , 2000 .

[17]  H. Harley,et al.  DISTRIBUTED MORPHOLOGY , 1999 .

[18]  M. Massuet,et al.  On the notion of theme vowel : a new approach to Catalan verbal morphology , 1999 .

[19]  Alec Marantz,et al.  No escape from syntax: Don't try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon , 1997 .

[20]  Dunstan Brown,et al.  Review: Robert Beard, Lexeme-Morpheme Base Morphology. A General Theory of Inflection and Word Formation. Albany: State University of New York Press , 1997 .

[21]  David Embick,et al.  Voice and the interfaces of syntax , 1997 .

[22]  Morris Halle,et al.  Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection , 1993 .

[23]  A. Zwicky,et al.  Inflectional morphology as a (sub)component of grammar , 1990 .

[24]  M. Halle,et al.  Segmental phonology of Modern English , 1985 .

[25]  Richard Sproat,et al.  On deriving the lexicon , 1985 .

[26]  Raimund Pfister,et al.  Handbuch der lateinischen Laut- und Formenlehre , 1977 .

[27]  F. Sommer.,et al.  Handbuch der lateinischen Laut- und Formenlehre , 1905 .

[28]  K. Brugmann.  Die mit dem Suffix -to- gebildeten Partizipia im Verbal-system des Lateinischen und des Umbrisch-Oskischen. Eine syntaktische Untersuchung. , 1895 .