A critical comparison between the semisitting and the supine positioning in vestibular schwannoma surgery: subgroup analysis of a randomized, multicenter trial.

OBJECTIVEPatient positioning in vestibular schwannoma (VS) surgery is a matter of ongoing discussion. Factors to consider include preservation of cranial nerve functions, extent of tumor resection, and complications. The objective of this study was to determine the optimal patient positioning in VS surgery.METHODSA subgroup analysis of a randomized, multicenter trial that investigated the efficacy of prophylactic nimodipine in VS surgery was performed to investigate the impact of positioning (semisitting or supine) on extent of resection, functional outcomes, and complications. The data of 97 patients were collected prospectively. All procedures were performed via a retrosigmoid approach. The semisitting position was chosen in 56 patients, whereas 41 patients were treated while supine.RESULTSComplete resection was obtained at a higher percentage in the semisitting as compared to the supine position (93% vs 73%, p = 0.002). Logistic regression analysis revealed significantly better facial nerve function in the early postoperative course in the semisitting group (p = 0.004), particularly concerning severe facial nerve paresis (House-Brackmann grade IV or worse; p = 0.002). One year after surgery, facial nerve function recovered. However, there was still a tendency for better facial nerve function in the semisitting group (p = 0.091). There were no significant differences between groups regarding hearing preservation rates. Venous air embolism with the necessity to terminate surgery occurred in 2 patients in the semisitting position (3.6%). Supplementary analysis with a 2-tailed permutation randomization with 10,000 permutations of treatment choice and a propensity score matching showed either a tendency or significant results for better facial nerve outcomes in the early postoperative course and extent of resection in the semisitting group.CONCLUSIONSAlthough the results of the various statistical analyses are not uniform, the data indicate better results concerning both a higher rate of complete removal (according to the intraoperative impression of the surgeon) and facial nerve function after a semisitting as compared to the supine position. These advantages may justify the potential higher risk for severe complications of the semisitting position in VS surgery. The choice of positioning has to consider all individual patient parameters and risks carefully.

[1]  J. Olson,et al.  Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence‐Based Guidelines on the Role of Imaging in the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Vestibular Schwannomas , 2018, Neurosurgery.

[2]  Harrison W. Lin,et al.  Long‐term MRI surveillance after microsurgery for vestibular schwannoma , 2017, The Laryngoscope.

[3]  R. Chou,et al.  A systematic review about the position-related complications of acoustic neuroma surgery via suboccipital retrosigmoid approach: Sitting versus lateral , 2017, Asian journal of neurosurgery.

[4]  H. Iro,et al.  Improved Postoperative Facial Nerve and Hearing Function in Retrosigmoid Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery Significantly Associated with Semisitting Position. , 2016, World neurosurgery.

[5]  Veit Rohde,et al.  Prophylactic nimodipine treatment for cochlear and facial nerve preservation after vestibular schwannoma surgery: a randomized multicenter Phase III trial. , 2016, Journal of neurosurgery.

[6]  F. Umansky,et al.  Comparison of outcomes following complex posterior fossa surgery performed in the sitting versus lateral position , 2015, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[7]  M. Tatagiba,et al.  Neurosurgical procedures in the semisitting position: evaluation of the risk of paradoxical venous air embolism in patients with a patent foramen ovale. , 2014, World neurosurgery.

[8]  O. Ganslandt,et al.  The sitting position in neurosurgery: indications, complications and results. a single institution experience of 600 cases , 2013, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[9]  Felix Thoemmes,et al.  Propensity score matching in SPSS , 2012, 1201.6385.

[10]  B. Meier,et al.  Patent foramen ovale and neurosurgery in sitting position: a systematic review. , 2009, British journal of anaesthesia.

[11]  V. Seifert,et al.  A STANDARDIZED PROTOCOL FOR THE PREVENTION OF CLINICALLY RELEVANT VENOUS AIR EMBOLISM DURING NEUROSURGICAL INTERVENTIONS IN THE SEMISITTING POSITION , 2009, Neurosurgery.

[12]  F. Warren,et al.  Postoperative imaging of vestibular schwannomas , 2008, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[13]  K. Leslie,et al.  Venous air embolism and the sitting position: A case series , 2006, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[14]  M. Brock,et al.  Venous and paradoxical air embolism in the sitting position. A prospective study with transoesophageal echocardiography , 2005, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[15]  K. Leslie,et al.  Anaesthesia for neurosurgery in the sitting position , 2004, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[16]  M. Castillo,et al.  Baseline and follow-up MRI of the internal auditory canal after suboccipital resection of acoustic schwannoma: appearances and clinical correlations , 1995, Neuroradiology.

[17]  G. Bouvier,et al.  Incidences of Venous Air Embolism and Patent Foramen Ovale among Patients Undergoing Selective Peripheral Denervation in the Sitting Position , 2003, Neurosurgery.

[18]  A. McEwan,et al.  The sitting position for neurosurgery in children: a review of 16 years' experience. , 2002, British journal of anaesthesia.

[19]  P. Carli,et al.  Is the sitting or the prone position best for surgery for posterior fossa tumours in children? , 2001, Paediatric anaesthesia.

[20]  A. Tatman,et al.  An audit of serious complications during neurosurgery in children using the sitting position , 2000, Paediatric anaesthesia.

[21]  M. Brock,et al.  Transcranial Doppler Ultrasonography as a Screening Technique for Detection of a Patent Foramen Ovale before Surgery in the Sitting Position , 2000, Anesthesiology.

[22]  J. Lynch,et al.  Venous air embolism in sitting and supine patients undergoing vestibular schwannoma resection. , 1998, Neurosurgery.

[23]  S. Black,et al.  Venous Air Embolism and Selective Denervation for Torticollis , 1997, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[24]  J. Weissman,et al.  The evolving MR appearance of structures in the internal auditory canal after removal of an acoustic neuroma. , 1997, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[25]  L. Moschini,et al.  Residual and Recurrent Acoustic Neuroma in Hearing Preservation Procedures: Neuroradiologic and Surgical Findings , 1996, Skull base surgery.

[26]  G. Gardner,et al.  Hearing Preservation in Unilateral Acoustic Neuroma Surgery , 1988, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[27]  F. Murtagh,et al.  Comparison of Surgical and Anesthetic Complications in Neurosurgical Patients Experiencing Venous Air Embolism in the Sitting Position , 1986, Neurosurgery.

[28]  P. Petrozza,et al.  Anesthesia and surgery in the seated position: analysis of 554 cases. , 1985, Neurosurgery.

[29]  J. W. House,et al.  Facial Nerve Grading System , 1985, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[30]  J. Bay,et al.  The sitting position in neurosurgery: a retrospective analysis of 488 cases. , 1984, Neurosurgery.

[31]  R. Fraser,et al.  Prevention of air embolism with positive end expiratory pressure. , 1983, Neurosurgery.

[32]  R. F. Cucchiara,et al.  Air embolism in children undergoing suboccipital craniotomy. , 1982, Anesthesiology.